Cargando…
Cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (SALVO)
BACKGROUND: Excessive haemorrhage at cesarean section requires donor (allogeneic) blood transfusion. Cell salvage may reduce this requirement. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (at 26 obstetric units; participants recruited from 4 June 2013 to 17 April 2016)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5736174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29261655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002471 |
_version_ | 1783287329508556800 |
---|---|
author | Khan, Khalid S. Moore, Philip A. S. Wilson, Matthew J. Hooper, Richard Allard, Shubha Wrench, Ian Beresford, Lee Roberts, Tracy E. McLoughlin, Carol Geoghegan, James Daniels, Jane P. Catling, Sue Clark, Vicki A. Ayuk, Paul Robson, Stephen Gao-Smith, Fang Hogg, Matthew Lanz, Doris Dodds, Julie |
author_facet | Khan, Khalid S. Moore, Philip A. S. Wilson, Matthew J. Hooper, Richard Allard, Shubha Wrench, Ian Beresford, Lee Roberts, Tracy E. McLoughlin, Carol Geoghegan, James Daniels, Jane P. Catling, Sue Clark, Vicki A. Ayuk, Paul Robson, Stephen Gao-Smith, Fang Hogg, Matthew Lanz, Doris Dodds, Julie |
author_sort | Khan, Khalid S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Excessive haemorrhage at cesarean section requires donor (allogeneic) blood transfusion. Cell salvage may reduce this requirement. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (at 26 obstetric units; participants recruited from 4 June 2013 to 17 April 2016) of routine cell salvage use (intervention) versus current standard of care without routine salvage use (control) in cesarean section among women at risk of haemorrhage. Randomisation was stratified, using random permuted blocks of variable sizes. In an intention-to-treat analysis, we used multivariable models, adjusting for stratification variables and prognostic factors identified a priori, to compare rates of donor blood transfusion (primary outcome) and fetomaternal haemorrhage ≥2 ml in RhD-negative women with RhD-positive babies (a secondary outcome) between groups. Among 3,028 women randomised (2,990 analysed), 95.6% of 1,498 assigned to intervention had cell salvage deployed (50.8% had salvaged blood returned; mean 259.9 ml) versus 3.9% of 1,492 assigned to control. Donor blood transfusion rate was 3.5% in the control group versus 2.5% in the intervention group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42 to 1.01, p = 0.056; adjusted risk difference −1.03, 95% CI −2.13 to 0.06). In a planned subgroup analysis, the transfusion rate was 4.6% in women assigned to control versus 3.0% in the intervention group among emergency cesareans (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.99), whereas it was 2.2% versus 1.8% among elective cesareans (adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.83) (interaction p = 0.46). No case of amniotic fluid embolism was observed. The rate of fetomaternal haemorrhage was higher with the intervention (10.5% in the control group versus 25.6% in the intervention group, adjusted OR 5.63, 95% CI 1.43 to 22.14, p = 0.013). We are unable to comment on long-term antibody sensitisation effects. CONCLUSIONS: The overall reduction observed in donor blood transfusion associated with the routine use of cell salvage during cesarean section was not statistically significant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered on ISRCTN as trial number 66118656 and can be viewed on http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN66118656. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5736174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57361742017-12-22 Cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (SALVO) Khan, Khalid S. Moore, Philip A. S. Wilson, Matthew J. Hooper, Richard Allard, Shubha Wrench, Ian Beresford, Lee Roberts, Tracy E. McLoughlin, Carol Geoghegan, James Daniels, Jane P. Catling, Sue Clark, Vicki A. Ayuk, Paul Robson, Stephen Gao-Smith, Fang Hogg, Matthew Lanz, Doris Dodds, Julie PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Excessive haemorrhage at cesarean section requires donor (allogeneic) blood transfusion. Cell salvage may reduce this requirement. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (at 26 obstetric units; participants recruited from 4 June 2013 to 17 April 2016) of routine cell salvage use (intervention) versus current standard of care without routine salvage use (control) in cesarean section among women at risk of haemorrhage. Randomisation was stratified, using random permuted blocks of variable sizes. In an intention-to-treat analysis, we used multivariable models, adjusting for stratification variables and prognostic factors identified a priori, to compare rates of donor blood transfusion (primary outcome) and fetomaternal haemorrhage ≥2 ml in RhD-negative women with RhD-positive babies (a secondary outcome) between groups. Among 3,028 women randomised (2,990 analysed), 95.6% of 1,498 assigned to intervention had cell salvage deployed (50.8% had salvaged blood returned; mean 259.9 ml) versus 3.9% of 1,492 assigned to control. Donor blood transfusion rate was 3.5% in the control group versus 2.5% in the intervention group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42 to 1.01, p = 0.056; adjusted risk difference −1.03, 95% CI −2.13 to 0.06). In a planned subgroup analysis, the transfusion rate was 4.6% in women assigned to control versus 3.0% in the intervention group among emergency cesareans (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.99), whereas it was 2.2% versus 1.8% among elective cesareans (adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.83) (interaction p = 0.46). No case of amniotic fluid embolism was observed. The rate of fetomaternal haemorrhage was higher with the intervention (10.5% in the control group versus 25.6% in the intervention group, adjusted OR 5.63, 95% CI 1.43 to 22.14, p = 0.013). We are unable to comment on long-term antibody sensitisation effects. CONCLUSIONS: The overall reduction observed in donor blood transfusion associated with the routine use of cell salvage during cesarean section was not statistically significant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered on ISRCTN as trial number 66118656 and can be viewed on http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN66118656. Public Library of Science 2017-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5736174/ /pubmed/29261655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002471 Text en © 2017 Khan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Khan, Khalid S. Moore, Philip A. S. Wilson, Matthew J. Hooper, Richard Allard, Shubha Wrench, Ian Beresford, Lee Roberts, Tracy E. McLoughlin, Carol Geoghegan, James Daniels, Jane P. Catling, Sue Clark, Vicki A. Ayuk, Paul Robson, Stephen Gao-Smith, Fang Hogg, Matthew Lanz, Doris Dodds, Julie Cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (SALVO) |
title | Cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (SALVO) |
title_full | Cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (SALVO) |
title_fullStr | Cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (SALVO) |
title_full_unstemmed | Cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (SALVO) |
title_short | Cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (SALVO) |
title_sort | cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (salvo) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5736174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29261655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002471 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khankhalids cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT moorephilipas cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT wilsonmatthewj cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT hooperrichard cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT allardshubha cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT wrenchian cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT beresfordlee cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT robertstracye cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT mcloughlincarol cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT geogheganjames cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT danielsjanep cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT catlingsue cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT clarkvickia cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT ayukpaul cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT robsonstephen cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT gaosmithfang cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT hoggmatthew cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT lanzdoris cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT doddsjulie cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo AT cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo |