Cargando…

Cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (SALVO)

BACKGROUND: Excessive haemorrhage at cesarean section requires donor (allogeneic) blood transfusion. Cell salvage may reduce this requirement. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (at 26 obstetric units; participants recruited from 4 June 2013 to 17 April 2016)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Khalid S., Moore, Philip A. S., Wilson, Matthew J., Hooper, Richard, Allard, Shubha, Wrench, Ian, Beresford, Lee, Roberts, Tracy E., McLoughlin, Carol, Geoghegan, James, Daniels, Jane P., Catling, Sue, Clark, Vicki A., Ayuk, Paul, Robson, Stephen, Gao-Smith, Fang, Hogg, Matthew, Lanz, Doris, Dodds, Julie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5736174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29261655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002471
_version_ 1783287329508556800
author Khan, Khalid S.
Moore, Philip A. S.
Wilson, Matthew J.
Hooper, Richard
Allard, Shubha
Wrench, Ian
Beresford, Lee
Roberts, Tracy E.
McLoughlin, Carol
Geoghegan, James
Daniels, Jane P.
Catling, Sue
Clark, Vicki A.
Ayuk, Paul
Robson, Stephen
Gao-Smith, Fang
Hogg, Matthew
Lanz, Doris
Dodds, Julie
author_facet Khan, Khalid S.
Moore, Philip A. S.
Wilson, Matthew J.
Hooper, Richard
Allard, Shubha
Wrench, Ian
Beresford, Lee
Roberts, Tracy E.
McLoughlin, Carol
Geoghegan, James
Daniels, Jane P.
Catling, Sue
Clark, Vicki A.
Ayuk, Paul
Robson, Stephen
Gao-Smith, Fang
Hogg, Matthew
Lanz, Doris
Dodds, Julie
author_sort Khan, Khalid S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Excessive haemorrhage at cesarean section requires donor (allogeneic) blood transfusion. Cell salvage may reduce this requirement. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (at 26 obstetric units; participants recruited from 4 June 2013 to 17 April 2016) of routine cell salvage use (intervention) versus current standard of care without routine salvage use (control) in cesarean section among women at risk of haemorrhage. Randomisation was stratified, using random permuted blocks of variable sizes. In an intention-to-treat analysis, we used multivariable models, adjusting for stratification variables and prognostic factors identified a priori, to compare rates of donor blood transfusion (primary outcome) and fetomaternal haemorrhage ≥2 ml in RhD-negative women with RhD-positive babies (a secondary outcome) between groups. Among 3,028 women randomised (2,990 analysed), 95.6% of 1,498 assigned to intervention had cell salvage deployed (50.8% had salvaged blood returned; mean 259.9 ml) versus 3.9% of 1,492 assigned to control. Donor blood transfusion rate was 3.5% in the control group versus 2.5% in the intervention group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42 to 1.01, p = 0.056; adjusted risk difference −1.03, 95% CI −2.13 to 0.06). In a planned subgroup analysis, the transfusion rate was 4.6% in women assigned to control versus 3.0% in the intervention group among emergency cesareans (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.99), whereas it was 2.2% versus 1.8% among elective cesareans (adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.83) (interaction p = 0.46). No case of amniotic fluid embolism was observed. The rate of fetomaternal haemorrhage was higher with the intervention (10.5% in the control group versus 25.6% in the intervention group, adjusted OR 5.63, 95% CI 1.43 to 22.14, p = 0.013). We are unable to comment on long-term antibody sensitisation effects. CONCLUSIONS: The overall reduction observed in donor blood transfusion associated with the routine use of cell salvage during cesarean section was not statistically significant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered on ISRCTN as trial number 66118656 and can be viewed on http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN66118656.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5736174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57361742017-12-22 Cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (SALVO) Khan, Khalid S. Moore, Philip A. S. Wilson, Matthew J. Hooper, Richard Allard, Shubha Wrench, Ian Beresford, Lee Roberts, Tracy E. McLoughlin, Carol Geoghegan, James Daniels, Jane P. Catling, Sue Clark, Vicki A. Ayuk, Paul Robson, Stephen Gao-Smith, Fang Hogg, Matthew Lanz, Doris Dodds, Julie PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Excessive haemorrhage at cesarean section requires donor (allogeneic) blood transfusion. Cell salvage may reduce this requirement. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (at 26 obstetric units; participants recruited from 4 June 2013 to 17 April 2016) of routine cell salvage use (intervention) versus current standard of care without routine salvage use (control) in cesarean section among women at risk of haemorrhage. Randomisation was stratified, using random permuted blocks of variable sizes. In an intention-to-treat analysis, we used multivariable models, adjusting for stratification variables and prognostic factors identified a priori, to compare rates of donor blood transfusion (primary outcome) and fetomaternal haemorrhage ≥2 ml in RhD-negative women with RhD-positive babies (a secondary outcome) between groups. Among 3,028 women randomised (2,990 analysed), 95.6% of 1,498 assigned to intervention had cell salvage deployed (50.8% had salvaged blood returned; mean 259.9 ml) versus 3.9% of 1,492 assigned to control. Donor blood transfusion rate was 3.5% in the control group versus 2.5% in the intervention group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42 to 1.01, p = 0.056; adjusted risk difference −1.03, 95% CI −2.13 to 0.06). In a planned subgroup analysis, the transfusion rate was 4.6% in women assigned to control versus 3.0% in the intervention group among emergency cesareans (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.99), whereas it was 2.2% versus 1.8% among elective cesareans (adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.83) (interaction p = 0.46). No case of amniotic fluid embolism was observed. The rate of fetomaternal haemorrhage was higher with the intervention (10.5% in the control group versus 25.6% in the intervention group, adjusted OR 5.63, 95% CI 1.43 to 22.14, p = 0.013). We are unable to comment on long-term antibody sensitisation effects. CONCLUSIONS: The overall reduction observed in donor blood transfusion associated with the routine use of cell salvage during cesarean section was not statistically significant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered on ISRCTN as trial number 66118656 and can be viewed on http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN66118656. Public Library of Science 2017-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5736174/ /pubmed/29261655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002471 Text en © 2017 Khan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khan, Khalid S.
Moore, Philip A. S.
Wilson, Matthew J.
Hooper, Richard
Allard, Shubha
Wrench, Ian
Beresford, Lee
Roberts, Tracy E.
McLoughlin, Carol
Geoghegan, James
Daniels, Jane P.
Catling, Sue
Clark, Vicki A.
Ayuk, Paul
Robson, Stephen
Gao-Smith, Fang
Hogg, Matthew
Lanz, Doris
Dodds, Julie
Cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (SALVO)
title Cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (SALVO)
title_full Cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (SALVO)
title_fullStr Cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (SALVO)
title_full_unstemmed Cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (SALVO)
title_short Cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (SALVO)
title_sort cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (salvo)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5736174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29261655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002471
work_keys_str_mv AT khankhalids cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT moorephilipas cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT wilsonmatthewj cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT hooperrichard cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT allardshubha cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT wrenchian cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT beresfordlee cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT robertstracye cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT mcloughlincarol cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT geogheganjames cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT danielsjanep cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT catlingsue cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT clarkvickia cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT ayukpaul cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT robsonstephen cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT gaosmithfang cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT hoggmatthew cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT lanzdoris cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT doddsjulie cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo
AT cellsalvageanddonorbloodtransfusionduringcesareansectionapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialsalvo