Cargando…

Comparative efficacy of two different topical povidone-iodine 5% regimens in reducing conjunctival bacterial flora: A randomized parallel double-masked clinical trial

INTRODUCTION: The increasing prevalence of multi-resistant bacteria is a major public health concern. Infections acquired during ophthalmic surgery are devastating. The purpose of the current study is to compare the proportion of eyes with negative bacterial cultures on all tested media after 1 vers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barroso, Letícia Fernandes, Cazella, Sarah Pereira, Nepomuceno, Antonio Brunno, Toscano, Luiza, Castilho, Liliane Ângela de Souza, Furlan, Eloísa Marcela Rueda, Messias, André, Scott, Ingrid U., Jorge, Rodrigo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5736199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29261737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189206
_version_ 1783287335471808512
author Barroso, Letícia Fernandes
Cazella, Sarah Pereira
Nepomuceno, Antonio Brunno
Toscano, Luiza
Castilho, Liliane Ângela de Souza
Furlan, Eloísa Marcela Rueda
Messias, André
Scott, Ingrid U.
Jorge, Rodrigo
author_facet Barroso, Letícia Fernandes
Cazella, Sarah Pereira
Nepomuceno, Antonio Brunno
Toscano, Luiza
Castilho, Liliane Ângela de Souza
Furlan, Eloísa Marcela Rueda
Messias, André
Scott, Ingrid U.
Jorge, Rodrigo
author_sort Barroso, Letícia Fernandes
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The increasing prevalence of multi-resistant bacteria is a major public health concern. Infections acquired during ophthalmic surgery are devastating. The purpose of the current study is to compare the proportion of eyes with negative bacterial cultures on all tested media after 1 versus 3 sequential drops of povidone-iodine (PI) 5% into the inferior conjunctival fornix. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 1 (PI group) drop (at time 28 minutes) or 3 (PI plus group) sequential drops (at time 0, 20 minutes and 28 minutes) of PI 5% into the inferior conjunctival sac of one randomly selected eye. A swab culture was obtained from the inferior conjunctival fornix 5 minutes before and 30 minutes after time 0. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured shortly before time 0 and shortly after time 30. Conjunctival swabs were incubated aerobically in enriched Thioglycolate liquid medium (meat broth) and in three solid culture media (chocolate agar, trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood, and Sabouraud agar). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of negative cultures after intervention between groups (p = 0.1638). Also in the PI group (n = 59), the proportion of eyes with negative cultures after PI (79.7%) did not differ significantly from baseline (76.3%; p = 0.7539). However in the PI plus group (n = 61), the proportion of eyes with all negative cultures after PI (85.3%) was significantly higher than before PI (70.5%) (p = 0.0177). There was no significant difference in mean CCT before and after the intervention in both groups. CONCLUSION: Instillation of 3 sequential drops of PI was associated with a significant increase in the proportion of eyes with all negative cultures, while instillation of a single drop of PI was not associated with a significant increase in the proportion of negative cultures. Further study is warranted to determine whether the difference between the PI administration regimens is also associated with differences in the rates of postoperative ocular infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5736199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57361992017-12-22 Comparative efficacy of two different topical povidone-iodine 5% regimens in reducing conjunctival bacterial flora: A randomized parallel double-masked clinical trial Barroso, Letícia Fernandes Cazella, Sarah Pereira Nepomuceno, Antonio Brunno Toscano, Luiza Castilho, Liliane Ângela de Souza Furlan, Eloísa Marcela Rueda Messias, André Scott, Ingrid U. Jorge, Rodrigo PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The increasing prevalence of multi-resistant bacteria is a major public health concern. Infections acquired during ophthalmic surgery are devastating. The purpose of the current study is to compare the proportion of eyes with negative bacterial cultures on all tested media after 1 versus 3 sequential drops of povidone-iodine (PI) 5% into the inferior conjunctival fornix. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 1 (PI group) drop (at time 28 minutes) or 3 (PI plus group) sequential drops (at time 0, 20 minutes and 28 minutes) of PI 5% into the inferior conjunctival sac of one randomly selected eye. A swab culture was obtained from the inferior conjunctival fornix 5 minutes before and 30 minutes after time 0. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured shortly before time 0 and shortly after time 30. Conjunctival swabs were incubated aerobically in enriched Thioglycolate liquid medium (meat broth) and in three solid culture media (chocolate agar, trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood, and Sabouraud agar). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of negative cultures after intervention between groups (p = 0.1638). Also in the PI group (n = 59), the proportion of eyes with negative cultures after PI (79.7%) did not differ significantly from baseline (76.3%; p = 0.7539). However in the PI plus group (n = 61), the proportion of eyes with all negative cultures after PI (85.3%) was significantly higher than before PI (70.5%) (p = 0.0177). There was no significant difference in mean CCT before and after the intervention in both groups. CONCLUSION: Instillation of 3 sequential drops of PI was associated with a significant increase in the proportion of eyes with all negative cultures, while instillation of a single drop of PI was not associated with a significant increase in the proportion of negative cultures. Further study is warranted to determine whether the difference between the PI administration regimens is also associated with differences in the rates of postoperative ocular infections. Public Library of Science 2017-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5736199/ /pubmed/29261737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189206 Text en © 2017 Barroso et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barroso, Letícia Fernandes
Cazella, Sarah Pereira
Nepomuceno, Antonio Brunno
Toscano, Luiza
Castilho, Liliane Ângela de Souza
Furlan, Eloísa Marcela Rueda
Messias, André
Scott, Ingrid U.
Jorge, Rodrigo
Comparative efficacy of two different topical povidone-iodine 5% regimens in reducing conjunctival bacterial flora: A randomized parallel double-masked clinical trial
title Comparative efficacy of two different topical povidone-iodine 5% regimens in reducing conjunctival bacterial flora: A randomized parallel double-masked clinical trial
title_full Comparative efficacy of two different topical povidone-iodine 5% regimens in reducing conjunctival bacterial flora: A randomized parallel double-masked clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of two different topical povidone-iodine 5% regimens in reducing conjunctival bacterial flora: A randomized parallel double-masked clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of two different topical povidone-iodine 5% regimens in reducing conjunctival bacterial flora: A randomized parallel double-masked clinical trial
title_short Comparative efficacy of two different topical povidone-iodine 5% regimens in reducing conjunctival bacterial flora: A randomized parallel double-masked clinical trial
title_sort comparative efficacy of two different topical povidone-iodine 5% regimens in reducing conjunctival bacterial flora: a randomized parallel double-masked clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5736199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29261737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189206
work_keys_str_mv AT barrosoleticiafernandes comparativeefficacyoftwodifferenttopicalpovidoneiodine5regimensinreducingconjunctivalbacterialfloraarandomizedparalleldoublemaskedclinicaltrial
AT cazellasarahpereira comparativeefficacyoftwodifferenttopicalpovidoneiodine5regimensinreducingconjunctivalbacterialfloraarandomizedparalleldoublemaskedclinicaltrial
AT nepomucenoantoniobrunno comparativeefficacyoftwodifferenttopicalpovidoneiodine5regimensinreducingconjunctivalbacterialfloraarandomizedparalleldoublemaskedclinicaltrial
AT toscanoluiza comparativeefficacyoftwodifferenttopicalpovidoneiodine5regimensinreducingconjunctivalbacterialfloraarandomizedparalleldoublemaskedclinicaltrial
AT castilholilianeangeladesouza comparativeefficacyoftwodifferenttopicalpovidoneiodine5regimensinreducingconjunctivalbacterialfloraarandomizedparalleldoublemaskedclinicaltrial
AT furlaneloisamarcelarueda comparativeefficacyoftwodifferenttopicalpovidoneiodine5regimensinreducingconjunctivalbacterialfloraarandomizedparalleldoublemaskedclinicaltrial
AT messiasandre comparativeefficacyoftwodifferenttopicalpovidoneiodine5regimensinreducingconjunctivalbacterialfloraarandomizedparalleldoublemaskedclinicaltrial
AT scottingridu comparativeefficacyoftwodifferenttopicalpovidoneiodine5regimensinreducingconjunctivalbacterialfloraarandomizedparalleldoublemaskedclinicaltrial
AT jorgerodrigo comparativeefficacyoftwodifferenttopicalpovidoneiodine5regimensinreducingconjunctivalbacterialfloraarandomizedparalleldoublemaskedclinicaltrial