Cargando…

Development of an Index of Engagement in HIV Care: An Adapted Internet-Based Delphi Process

BACKGROUND: Improving engagement in medical care among persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is critical to optimizing clinical outcomes and reducing onward transmission of HIV. However, a clear conceptualization of what it means to be engaged in HIV care is lacking, and thus effort...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Mallory O, Koester, Kimberly A, Wood, Troy, Neilands, Torsten B, Pomeranz, Jamie L, Christopoulos, Katerina A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5736874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29208589
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.8520
_version_ 1783287438529003520
author Johnson, Mallory O
Koester, Kimberly A
Wood, Troy
Neilands, Torsten B
Pomeranz, Jamie L
Christopoulos, Katerina A
author_facet Johnson, Mallory O
Koester, Kimberly A
Wood, Troy
Neilands, Torsten B
Pomeranz, Jamie L
Christopoulos, Katerina A
author_sort Johnson, Mallory O
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Improving engagement in medical care among persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is critical to optimizing clinical outcomes and reducing onward transmission of HIV. However, a clear conceptualization of what it means to be engaged in HIV care is lacking, and thus efforts to measure and enhance engagement in care are limited. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the use of a modified online Delphi process of consensus building to solicit input from a range of HIV and non-HIV researchers and providers, and to integrate that input with focus group data conducted with HIV-infected patients. The overarching goal was to generate items for a patient-centered measure of engagement in HIV care for use in future research and clinical practice. METHODS: We recruited 66 expert panelists from around the United States. Starting with six open-ended questions, we used four rounds of online Delphi data collection in tandem with 12 in-person focus groups with patients and cognitive interviews with 25 patients. RESULTS: We recruited 66 expert panelists from around the United States and 64 (97%) were retained for four rounds of data collection. Starting with six open-ended questions, we used four rounds of online Delphi data collection in tandem with 12 in-person focus groups with patients and cognitive interviews with 25 patients. The process resulted in an expansion to 120 topics that were subsequently reduced to 13 candidate items for the planned assessment measure. CONCLUSIONS: The process was an efficient method of soliciting input from geographically separated and busy experts across a range of disciplines and professional roles with the aim of arriving at a coherent definition of engagement in HIV care and a manageable set of survey items to assess it. Next steps are to validate the utility of the new measure in predicting retention in care, adherence to treatment, and clinical outcomes among patients living with HIV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5736874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57368742017-12-28 Development of an Index of Engagement in HIV Care: An Adapted Internet-Based Delphi Process Johnson, Mallory O Koester, Kimberly A Wood, Troy Neilands, Torsten B Pomeranz, Jamie L Christopoulos, Katerina A JMIR Res Protoc Original Paper BACKGROUND: Improving engagement in medical care among persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is critical to optimizing clinical outcomes and reducing onward transmission of HIV. However, a clear conceptualization of what it means to be engaged in HIV care is lacking, and thus efforts to measure and enhance engagement in care are limited. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the use of a modified online Delphi process of consensus building to solicit input from a range of HIV and non-HIV researchers and providers, and to integrate that input with focus group data conducted with HIV-infected patients. The overarching goal was to generate items for a patient-centered measure of engagement in HIV care for use in future research and clinical practice. METHODS: We recruited 66 expert panelists from around the United States. Starting with six open-ended questions, we used four rounds of online Delphi data collection in tandem with 12 in-person focus groups with patients and cognitive interviews with 25 patients. RESULTS: We recruited 66 expert panelists from around the United States and 64 (97%) were retained for four rounds of data collection. Starting with six open-ended questions, we used four rounds of online Delphi data collection in tandem with 12 in-person focus groups with patients and cognitive interviews with 25 patients. The process resulted in an expansion to 120 topics that were subsequently reduced to 13 candidate items for the planned assessment measure. CONCLUSIONS: The process was an efficient method of soliciting input from geographically separated and busy experts across a range of disciplines and professional roles with the aim of arriving at a coherent definition of engagement in HIV care and a manageable set of survey items to assess it. Next steps are to validate the utility of the new measure in predicting retention in care, adherence to treatment, and clinical outcomes among patients living with HIV. JMIR Publications 2017-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5736874/ /pubmed/29208589 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.8520 Text en ©Mallory O Johnson, Kimberly A Koester, Troy Wood, Torsten B Neilands, Jamie L Pomeranz, Katerina A Christopoulos. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 05.12.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Johnson, Mallory O
Koester, Kimberly A
Wood, Troy
Neilands, Torsten B
Pomeranz, Jamie L
Christopoulos, Katerina A
Development of an Index of Engagement in HIV Care: An Adapted Internet-Based Delphi Process
title Development of an Index of Engagement in HIV Care: An Adapted Internet-Based Delphi Process
title_full Development of an Index of Engagement in HIV Care: An Adapted Internet-Based Delphi Process
title_fullStr Development of an Index of Engagement in HIV Care: An Adapted Internet-Based Delphi Process
title_full_unstemmed Development of an Index of Engagement in HIV Care: An Adapted Internet-Based Delphi Process
title_short Development of an Index of Engagement in HIV Care: An Adapted Internet-Based Delphi Process
title_sort development of an index of engagement in hiv care: an adapted internet-based delphi process
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5736874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29208589
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.8520
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonmalloryo developmentofanindexofengagementinhivcareanadaptedinternetbaseddelphiprocess
AT koesterkimberlya developmentofanindexofengagementinhivcareanadaptedinternetbaseddelphiprocess
AT woodtroy developmentofanindexofengagementinhivcareanadaptedinternetbaseddelphiprocess
AT neilandstorstenb developmentofanindexofengagementinhivcareanadaptedinternetbaseddelphiprocess
AT pomeranzjamiel developmentofanindexofengagementinhivcareanadaptedinternetbaseddelphiprocess
AT christopouloskaterinaa developmentofanindexofengagementinhivcareanadaptedinternetbaseddelphiprocess