Cargando…

RCT Testing Bystander Effectiveness to Reduce Violence

INTRODUCTION: Bystander-based programs have shown promise to reduce interpersonal violence at colleges, yet limited rigorous evaluations have addressed bystander intervention effectiveness in high schools. This study evaluated the Green Dot bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence and relate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coker, Ann L., Bush, Heather M., Cook-Craig, Patricia G., DeGue, Sarah A., Clear, Emily R., Brancato, Candace J., Fisher, Bonnie S., Recktenwald, Eileen A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5737001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28279546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.020
_version_ 1783287461322948608
author Coker, Ann L.
Bush, Heather M.
Cook-Craig, Patricia G.
DeGue, Sarah A.
Clear, Emily R.
Brancato, Candace J.
Fisher, Bonnie S.
Recktenwald, Eileen A.
author_facet Coker, Ann L.
Bush, Heather M.
Cook-Craig, Patricia G.
DeGue, Sarah A.
Clear, Emily R.
Brancato, Candace J.
Fisher, Bonnie S.
Recktenwald, Eileen A.
author_sort Coker, Ann L.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Bystander-based programs have shown promise to reduce interpersonal violence at colleges, yet limited rigorous evaluations have addressed bystander intervention effectiveness in high schools. This study evaluated the Green Dot bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence and related forms of interpersonal violence in 26 high schools over 5 years. DESIGN: A cluster RCT was conducted. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Kentucky high schools were randomized to intervention or control (wait list) conditions. INTERVENTION: Green Dot–trained educators conducted schoolwide presentations and recruited student popular opinion leaders to receive bystander training in intervention schools beginning in Year 1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was sexual violence perpetration, and related forms of interpersonal violence victimization and perpetration were also measured using anonymous student surveys collected at baseline and annually from 2010 to 2014. Because the school was the unit of analysis, violence measures were aggregated by school and year and school-level counts were provided. RESULTS: A total of 89,707 students completed surveys. The primary, as randomized, analyses conducted in 2014–2016 included linear mixed models and generalized estimating equations to examine the condition–time interaction on violence outcomes. Slopes of school-level totals of sexual violence perpetration (condition–time, p<0.001) and victimization (condition time, p<0.001) were different over time. During Years 3–4, when Green Dot was fully implemented, the mean number of sexual violent events prevented by the intervention was 120 in Intervention Year 3 and 88 in Year 4. For Year 3, prevalence rate ratios for sexual violence perpetration in the intervention relative to control schools were 0.83 (95% CI=0.70, 0.99) in Year 3 and 0.79 (95% CI=0.67, 0.94) in Year 4. Similar patterns were observed for sexual violence victimization, sexual harassment, stalking, and dating violence perpetration and victimization. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of Green Dot in Kentucky high schools significantly decreased not only sexual violence perpetration but also other forms of interpersonal violence perpetration and victimization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5737001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57370012017-12-20 RCT Testing Bystander Effectiveness to Reduce Violence Coker, Ann L. Bush, Heather M. Cook-Craig, Patricia G. DeGue, Sarah A. Clear, Emily R. Brancato, Candace J. Fisher, Bonnie S. Recktenwald, Eileen A. Am J Prev Med Article INTRODUCTION: Bystander-based programs have shown promise to reduce interpersonal violence at colleges, yet limited rigorous evaluations have addressed bystander intervention effectiveness in high schools. This study evaluated the Green Dot bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence and related forms of interpersonal violence in 26 high schools over 5 years. DESIGN: A cluster RCT was conducted. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Kentucky high schools were randomized to intervention or control (wait list) conditions. INTERVENTION: Green Dot–trained educators conducted schoolwide presentations and recruited student popular opinion leaders to receive bystander training in intervention schools beginning in Year 1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was sexual violence perpetration, and related forms of interpersonal violence victimization and perpetration were also measured using anonymous student surveys collected at baseline and annually from 2010 to 2014. Because the school was the unit of analysis, violence measures were aggregated by school and year and school-level counts were provided. RESULTS: A total of 89,707 students completed surveys. The primary, as randomized, analyses conducted in 2014–2016 included linear mixed models and generalized estimating equations to examine the condition–time interaction on violence outcomes. Slopes of school-level totals of sexual violence perpetration (condition–time, p<0.001) and victimization (condition time, p<0.001) were different over time. During Years 3–4, when Green Dot was fully implemented, the mean number of sexual violent events prevented by the intervention was 120 in Intervention Year 3 and 88 in Year 4. For Year 3, prevalence rate ratios for sexual violence perpetration in the intervention relative to control schools were 0.83 (95% CI=0.70, 0.99) in Year 3 and 0.79 (95% CI=0.67, 0.94) in Year 4. Similar patterns were observed for sexual violence victimization, sexual harassment, stalking, and dating violence perpetration and victimization. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of Green Dot in Kentucky high schools significantly decreased not only sexual violence perpetration but also other forms of interpersonal violence perpetration and victimization. 2017-03-06 2017-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5737001/ /pubmed/28279546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.020 Text en This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Coker, Ann L.
Bush, Heather M.
Cook-Craig, Patricia G.
DeGue, Sarah A.
Clear, Emily R.
Brancato, Candace J.
Fisher, Bonnie S.
Recktenwald, Eileen A.
RCT Testing Bystander Effectiveness to Reduce Violence
title RCT Testing Bystander Effectiveness to Reduce Violence
title_full RCT Testing Bystander Effectiveness to Reduce Violence
title_fullStr RCT Testing Bystander Effectiveness to Reduce Violence
title_full_unstemmed RCT Testing Bystander Effectiveness to Reduce Violence
title_short RCT Testing Bystander Effectiveness to Reduce Violence
title_sort rct testing bystander effectiveness to reduce violence
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5737001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28279546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.020
work_keys_str_mv AT cokerannl rcttestingbystandereffectivenesstoreduceviolence
AT bushheatherm rcttestingbystandereffectivenesstoreduceviolence
AT cookcraigpatriciag rcttestingbystandereffectivenesstoreduceviolence
AT deguesaraha rcttestingbystandereffectivenesstoreduceviolence
AT clearemilyr rcttestingbystandereffectivenesstoreduceviolence
AT brancatocandacej rcttestingbystandereffectivenesstoreduceviolence
AT fisherbonnies rcttestingbystandereffectivenesstoreduceviolence
AT recktenwaldeileena rcttestingbystandereffectivenesstoreduceviolence