Cargando…
Evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques
We evaluated dose–volume histogram (DVH) parameters based on deformable image registration (DIR) between brachytherapy (BT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) that included a center-shielded (CS) plan. Eleven cervical cancer patients were treated with BT, and their pelvic and CS EBRT were studied...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5737357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28595311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx028 |
_version_ | 1783287503685419008 |
---|---|
author | Kadoya, Noriyuki Miyasaka, YuYa Yamamoto, Takaya Kuroda, Yoshihiro Ito, Kengo Chiba, Mizuki Nakajima, Yujiro Takahashi, Noriyoshi Kubozono, Masaki Umezawa, Rei Dobashi, Suguru Takeda, Ken Jingu, Keiichi |
author_facet | Kadoya, Noriyuki Miyasaka, YuYa Yamamoto, Takaya Kuroda, Yoshihiro Ito, Kengo Chiba, Mizuki Nakajima, Yujiro Takahashi, Noriyoshi Kubozono, Masaki Umezawa, Rei Dobashi, Suguru Takeda, Ken Jingu, Keiichi |
author_sort | Kadoya, Noriyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | We evaluated dose–volume histogram (DVH) parameters based on deformable image registration (DIR) between brachytherapy (BT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) that included a center-shielded (CS) plan. Eleven cervical cancer patients were treated with BT, and their pelvic and CS EBRT were studied. Planning CT images for EBRT and BT (except for the first BT, used as the reference image) were deformed with DIR to reference image. We used two DIR parameter settings: intensity-based and hybrid. Mean Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) comparing EBRT with the reference for the uterus, rectum and bladder were 0.81, 0.77 and 0.83, respectively, for hybrid DIR and 0.47, 0.37 and 0.42, respectively, for intensity-based DIR (P < 0.05). D(1 cm(3)) for hybrid DIR, intensity-based DIR and DVH addition were 75.1, 81.2 and 78.2 Gy, respectively, for the rectum, whereas they were 93.5, 92.3 and 94.3 Gy, respectively, for the bladder. D(2 cm(3)) for hybrid DIR, intensity-based DIR and DVH addition were 70.1, 74.0 and 71.4 Gy, respectively, for the rectum, whereas they were 85.4, 82.8 and 85.4 Gy, respectively, for the bladder. Overall, hybrid DIR obtained higher DSCs than intensity-based DIR, and there were moderate differences in DVH parameters between the two DIR methods, although the results varied among patients. DIR is only experimental, and extra care should be taken when comparing DIR-based dose values with dose–effect curves established using DVH addition. Also, a true evaluation of DIR-based dose accumulation would require ground truth data (e.g. measurement with physical phantom). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5737357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57373572018-01-08 Evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques Kadoya, Noriyuki Miyasaka, YuYa Yamamoto, Takaya Kuroda, Yoshihiro Ito, Kengo Chiba, Mizuki Nakajima, Yujiro Takahashi, Noriyoshi Kubozono, Masaki Umezawa, Rei Dobashi, Suguru Takeda, Ken Jingu, Keiichi J Radiat Res Oncology We evaluated dose–volume histogram (DVH) parameters based on deformable image registration (DIR) between brachytherapy (BT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) that included a center-shielded (CS) plan. Eleven cervical cancer patients were treated with BT, and their pelvic and CS EBRT were studied. Planning CT images for EBRT and BT (except for the first BT, used as the reference image) were deformed with DIR to reference image. We used two DIR parameter settings: intensity-based and hybrid. Mean Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) comparing EBRT with the reference for the uterus, rectum and bladder were 0.81, 0.77 and 0.83, respectively, for hybrid DIR and 0.47, 0.37 and 0.42, respectively, for intensity-based DIR (P < 0.05). D(1 cm(3)) for hybrid DIR, intensity-based DIR and DVH addition were 75.1, 81.2 and 78.2 Gy, respectively, for the rectum, whereas they were 93.5, 92.3 and 94.3 Gy, respectively, for the bladder. D(2 cm(3)) for hybrid DIR, intensity-based DIR and DVH addition were 70.1, 74.0 and 71.4 Gy, respectively, for the rectum, whereas they were 85.4, 82.8 and 85.4 Gy, respectively, for the bladder. Overall, hybrid DIR obtained higher DSCs than intensity-based DIR, and there were moderate differences in DVH parameters between the two DIR methods, although the results varied among patients. DIR is only experimental, and extra care should be taken when comparing DIR-based dose values with dose–effect curves established using DVH addition. Also, a true evaluation of DIR-based dose accumulation would require ground truth data (e.g. measurement with physical phantom). Oxford University Press 2017-09 2017-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5737357/ /pubmed/28595311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx028 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Kadoya, Noriyuki Miyasaka, YuYa Yamamoto, Takaya Kuroda, Yoshihiro Ito, Kengo Chiba, Mizuki Nakajima, Yujiro Takahashi, Noriyoshi Kubozono, Masaki Umezawa, Rei Dobashi, Suguru Takeda, Ken Jingu, Keiichi Evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques |
title | Evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques |
title_full | Evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques |
title_short | Evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques |
title_sort | evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5737357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28595311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kadoyanoriyuki evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques AT miyasakayuya evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques AT yamamototakaya evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques AT kurodayoshihiro evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques AT itokengo evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques AT chibamizuki evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques AT nakajimayujiro evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques AT takahashinoriyoshi evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques AT kubozonomasaki evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques AT umezawarei evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques AT dobashisuguru evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques AT takedaken evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques AT jingukeiichi evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques |