Cargando…

Evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques

We evaluated dose–volume histogram (DVH) parameters based on deformable image registration (DIR) between brachytherapy (BT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) that included a center-shielded (CS) plan. Eleven cervical cancer patients were treated with BT, and their pelvic and CS EBRT were studied...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kadoya, Noriyuki, Miyasaka, YuYa, Yamamoto, Takaya, Kuroda, Yoshihiro, Ito, Kengo, Chiba, Mizuki, Nakajima, Yujiro, Takahashi, Noriyoshi, Kubozono, Masaki, Umezawa, Rei, Dobashi, Suguru, Takeda, Ken, Jingu, Keiichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5737357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28595311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx028
_version_ 1783287503685419008
author Kadoya, Noriyuki
Miyasaka, YuYa
Yamamoto, Takaya
Kuroda, Yoshihiro
Ito, Kengo
Chiba, Mizuki
Nakajima, Yujiro
Takahashi, Noriyoshi
Kubozono, Masaki
Umezawa, Rei
Dobashi, Suguru
Takeda, Ken
Jingu, Keiichi
author_facet Kadoya, Noriyuki
Miyasaka, YuYa
Yamamoto, Takaya
Kuroda, Yoshihiro
Ito, Kengo
Chiba, Mizuki
Nakajima, Yujiro
Takahashi, Noriyoshi
Kubozono, Masaki
Umezawa, Rei
Dobashi, Suguru
Takeda, Ken
Jingu, Keiichi
author_sort Kadoya, Noriyuki
collection PubMed
description We evaluated dose–volume histogram (DVH) parameters based on deformable image registration (DIR) between brachytherapy (BT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) that included a center-shielded (CS) plan. Eleven cervical cancer patients were treated with BT, and their pelvic and CS EBRT were studied. Planning CT images for EBRT and BT (except for the first BT, used as the reference image) were deformed with DIR to reference image. We used two DIR parameter settings: intensity-based and hybrid. Mean Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) comparing EBRT with the reference for the uterus, rectum and bladder were 0.81, 0.77 and 0.83, respectively, for hybrid DIR and 0.47, 0.37 and 0.42, respectively, for intensity-based DIR (P < 0.05). D(1 cm(3)) for hybrid DIR, intensity-based DIR and DVH addition were 75.1, 81.2 and 78.2 Gy, respectively, for the rectum, whereas they were 93.5, 92.3 and 94.3 Gy, respectively, for the bladder. D(2 cm(3)) for hybrid DIR, intensity-based DIR and DVH addition were 70.1, 74.0 and 71.4 Gy, respectively, for the rectum, whereas they were 85.4, 82.8 and 85.4 Gy, respectively, for the bladder. Overall, hybrid DIR obtained higher DSCs than intensity-based DIR, and there were moderate differences in DVH parameters between the two DIR methods, although the results varied among patients. DIR is only experimental, and extra care should be taken when comparing DIR-based dose values with dose–effect curves established using DVH addition. Also, a true evaluation of DIR-based dose accumulation would require ground truth data (e.g. measurement with physical phantom).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5737357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57373572018-01-08 Evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques Kadoya, Noriyuki Miyasaka, YuYa Yamamoto, Takaya Kuroda, Yoshihiro Ito, Kengo Chiba, Mizuki Nakajima, Yujiro Takahashi, Noriyoshi Kubozono, Masaki Umezawa, Rei Dobashi, Suguru Takeda, Ken Jingu, Keiichi J Radiat Res Oncology We evaluated dose–volume histogram (DVH) parameters based on deformable image registration (DIR) between brachytherapy (BT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) that included a center-shielded (CS) plan. Eleven cervical cancer patients were treated with BT, and their pelvic and CS EBRT were studied. Planning CT images for EBRT and BT (except for the first BT, used as the reference image) were deformed with DIR to reference image. We used two DIR parameter settings: intensity-based and hybrid. Mean Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) comparing EBRT with the reference for the uterus, rectum and bladder were 0.81, 0.77 and 0.83, respectively, for hybrid DIR and 0.47, 0.37 and 0.42, respectively, for intensity-based DIR (P < 0.05). D(1 cm(3)) for hybrid DIR, intensity-based DIR and DVH addition were 75.1, 81.2 and 78.2 Gy, respectively, for the rectum, whereas they were 93.5, 92.3 and 94.3 Gy, respectively, for the bladder. D(2 cm(3)) for hybrid DIR, intensity-based DIR and DVH addition were 70.1, 74.0 and 71.4 Gy, respectively, for the rectum, whereas they were 85.4, 82.8 and 85.4 Gy, respectively, for the bladder. Overall, hybrid DIR obtained higher DSCs than intensity-based DIR, and there were moderate differences in DVH parameters between the two DIR methods, although the results varied among patients. DIR is only experimental, and extra care should be taken when comparing DIR-based dose values with dose–effect curves established using DVH addition. Also, a true evaluation of DIR-based dose accumulation would require ground truth data (e.g. measurement with physical phantom). Oxford University Press 2017-09 2017-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5737357/ /pubmed/28595311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx028 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oncology
Kadoya, Noriyuki
Miyasaka, YuYa
Yamamoto, Takaya
Kuroda, Yoshihiro
Ito, Kengo
Chiba, Mizuki
Nakajima, Yujiro
Takahashi, Noriyoshi
Kubozono, Masaki
Umezawa, Rei
Dobashi, Suguru
Takeda, Ken
Jingu, Keiichi
Evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques
title Evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques
title_full Evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques
title_fullStr Evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques
title_short Evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques
title_sort evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5737357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28595311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx028
work_keys_str_mv AT kadoyanoriyuki evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques
AT miyasakayuya evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques
AT yamamototakaya evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques
AT kurodayoshihiro evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques
AT itokengo evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques
AT chibamizuki evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques
AT nakajimayujiro evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques
AT takahashinoriyoshi evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques
AT kubozonomasaki evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques
AT umezawarei evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques
AT dobashisuguru evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques
AT takedaken evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques
AT jingukeiichi evaluationofrectumandbladderdoseaccumulationfromexternalbeamradiotherapyandbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerusingtwodifferentdeformableimageregistrationtechniques