Cargando…

Comparison of multileaf collimator and conventional circular collimator systems in Cyberknife stereotactic radiotherapy

Multileaf collimator (MLC) technology has been newly introduced with the Cyberknife system. This study investigated the advantages of this system compared with the conventional circular collimator (CC) system. Dosimetric comparisons of MLC and CC plans were carried out. First, to investigate suitabl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murai, Taro, Hattori, Yukiko, Sugie, Chikao, Iwata, Hiromitsu, Iwabuchi, Michio, Shibamoto, Yuta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5737677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28199669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw130
_version_ 1783287566635630592
author Murai, Taro
Hattori, Yukiko
Sugie, Chikao
Iwata, Hiromitsu
Iwabuchi, Michio
Shibamoto, Yuta
author_facet Murai, Taro
Hattori, Yukiko
Sugie, Chikao
Iwata, Hiromitsu
Iwabuchi, Michio
Shibamoto, Yuta
author_sort Murai, Taro
collection PubMed
description Multileaf collimator (MLC) technology has been newly introduced with the Cyberknife system. This study investigated the advantages of this system compared with the conventional circular collimator (CC) system. Dosimetric comparisons of MLC and CC plans were carried out. First, to investigate suitable target sizes for the MLC mode, MLC and CC plans were generated using computed tomography (CT) images from 5 patients for 1, 3, 5 and 7 cm diameter targets. Second, MLC and CC plans were compared in 10 patients, each with liver and prostate targets. For brain targets, doses to the brain could be spared in MLC plans better than in CC plans (P ≤ 0.02). The MLC mode also achieved more uniform dose delivery to the targets. The conformity index in MLC plans was stable, irrespective of the target size (P = 0.5). For patients with liver tumors, the MLC mode achieved higher target coverage than the CC mode (P = 0.04). For prostate tumors, doses to the rectum and the conformity index were lowered in MLC plans compared with in CC plans (P ≤ 0.04). In all target plans, treatment times in MLC plans were shorter than those in CC plans (P < 0.001). The newly introduced MLC technology can reduce treatment time and provide favorable or comparable dose distribution for 1–7 cm targets. In particular, the MLC mode has dosimetric advantage for targets near organs at risk. Therefore, the MLC mode is recommended as the first option in stereotactic body radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5737677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57376772018-01-04 Comparison of multileaf collimator and conventional circular collimator systems in Cyberknife stereotactic radiotherapy Murai, Taro Hattori, Yukiko Sugie, Chikao Iwata, Hiromitsu Iwabuchi, Michio Shibamoto, Yuta J Radiat Res Oncology Multileaf collimator (MLC) technology has been newly introduced with the Cyberknife system. This study investigated the advantages of this system compared with the conventional circular collimator (CC) system. Dosimetric comparisons of MLC and CC plans were carried out. First, to investigate suitable target sizes for the MLC mode, MLC and CC plans were generated using computed tomography (CT) images from 5 patients for 1, 3, 5 and 7 cm diameter targets. Second, MLC and CC plans were compared in 10 patients, each with liver and prostate targets. For brain targets, doses to the brain could be spared in MLC plans better than in CC plans (P ≤ 0.02). The MLC mode also achieved more uniform dose delivery to the targets. The conformity index in MLC plans was stable, irrespective of the target size (P = 0.5). For patients with liver tumors, the MLC mode achieved higher target coverage than the CC mode (P = 0.04). For prostate tumors, doses to the rectum and the conformity index were lowered in MLC plans compared with in CC plans (P ≤ 0.04). In all target plans, treatment times in MLC plans were shorter than those in CC plans (P < 0.001). The newly introduced MLC technology can reduce treatment time and provide favorable or comparable dose distribution for 1–7 cm targets. In particular, the MLC mode has dosimetric advantage for targets near organs at risk. Therefore, the MLC mode is recommended as the first option in stereotactic body radiotherapy. Oxford University Press 2017-09 2017-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5737677/ /pubmed/28199669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw130 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oncology
Murai, Taro
Hattori, Yukiko
Sugie, Chikao
Iwata, Hiromitsu
Iwabuchi, Michio
Shibamoto, Yuta
Comparison of multileaf collimator and conventional circular collimator systems in Cyberknife stereotactic radiotherapy
title Comparison of multileaf collimator and conventional circular collimator systems in Cyberknife stereotactic radiotherapy
title_full Comparison of multileaf collimator and conventional circular collimator systems in Cyberknife stereotactic radiotherapy
title_fullStr Comparison of multileaf collimator and conventional circular collimator systems in Cyberknife stereotactic radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of multileaf collimator and conventional circular collimator systems in Cyberknife stereotactic radiotherapy
title_short Comparison of multileaf collimator and conventional circular collimator systems in Cyberknife stereotactic radiotherapy
title_sort comparison of multileaf collimator and conventional circular collimator systems in cyberknife stereotactic radiotherapy
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5737677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28199669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw130
work_keys_str_mv AT muraitaro comparisonofmultileafcollimatorandconventionalcircularcollimatorsystemsincyberknifestereotacticradiotherapy
AT hattoriyukiko comparisonofmultileafcollimatorandconventionalcircularcollimatorsystemsincyberknifestereotacticradiotherapy
AT sugiechikao comparisonofmultileafcollimatorandconventionalcircularcollimatorsystemsincyberknifestereotacticradiotherapy
AT iwatahiromitsu comparisonofmultileafcollimatorandconventionalcircularcollimatorsystemsincyberknifestereotacticradiotherapy
AT iwabuchimichio comparisonofmultileafcollimatorandconventionalcircularcollimatorsystemsincyberknifestereotacticradiotherapy
AT shibamotoyuta comparisonofmultileafcollimatorandconventionalcircularcollimatorsystemsincyberknifestereotacticradiotherapy