Cargando…

Characterization of relative biological effectiveness for conventional radiation therapy: a comparison of clinical 6 MV X-rays and (137)Cs

Various types of radiation are utilized in the treatment of cancer. Equal physical doses of different radiation types do not always result in the same amount of biological damage. In order to account for these differences, a scaling factor known as the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) can be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howard, Michelle, Beltran, Chris, Sarkaria, Jann, Herman, Michael G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5737853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28444207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx018
_version_ 1783287585230028800
author Howard, Michelle
Beltran, Chris
Sarkaria, Jann
Herman, Michael G
author_facet Howard, Michelle
Beltran, Chris
Sarkaria, Jann
Herman, Michael G
author_sort Howard, Michelle
collection PubMed
description Various types of radiation are utilized in the treatment of cancer. Equal physical doses of different radiation types do not always result in the same amount of biological damage. In order to account for these differences, a scaling factor known as the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) can be used. (137)Cesium ((137)Cs) has been used as a source of radiation in a significant body of radiation therapy research. However, high-energy X-rays, such as 6 MV X-rays, are currently used clinically to treat patients. To date, there is a gap in the literature regarding the RBE comparison of these two types of radiation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the RBE of (137)Cs relative to that of 6 MV X-rays. To determine the RBE, five cell lines were irradiated [Chinese hamster ovary (CHO); human lung adenocarcinoma (A549); human glioma (U251); human glioma (T98); and human osteosarcoma (U2OS)] by both types of radiation and assessed for cell survival using a clonogenic assay. Three of the five cell lines resulted in RBE values of ~1.00 to within 11% for all survival fractions, showing the physical and biological dose for these two types of radiation were equivalent. The other two cell lines gave RBE values differing from 1.00 by up to 36%. In conclusion, the results show the range in biological effect seen between cell lines, and therefore cell type must be considered when characterizing RBE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5737853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57378532018-01-04 Characterization of relative biological effectiveness for conventional radiation therapy: a comparison of clinical 6 MV X-rays and (137)Cs Howard, Michelle Beltran, Chris Sarkaria, Jann Herman, Michael G J Radiat Res Biology Various types of radiation are utilized in the treatment of cancer. Equal physical doses of different radiation types do not always result in the same amount of biological damage. In order to account for these differences, a scaling factor known as the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) can be used. (137)Cesium ((137)Cs) has been used as a source of radiation in a significant body of radiation therapy research. However, high-energy X-rays, such as 6 MV X-rays, are currently used clinically to treat patients. To date, there is a gap in the literature regarding the RBE comparison of these two types of radiation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the RBE of (137)Cs relative to that of 6 MV X-rays. To determine the RBE, five cell lines were irradiated [Chinese hamster ovary (CHO); human lung adenocarcinoma (A549); human glioma (U251); human glioma (T98); and human osteosarcoma (U2OS)] by both types of radiation and assessed for cell survival using a clonogenic assay. Three of the five cell lines resulted in RBE values of ~1.00 to within 11% for all survival fractions, showing the physical and biological dose for these two types of radiation were equivalent. The other two cell lines gave RBE values differing from 1.00 by up to 36%. In conclusion, the results show the range in biological effect seen between cell lines, and therefore cell type must be considered when characterizing RBE. Oxford University Press 2017-09 2017-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5737853/ /pubmed/28444207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx018 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Biology
Howard, Michelle
Beltran, Chris
Sarkaria, Jann
Herman, Michael G
Characterization of relative biological effectiveness for conventional radiation therapy: a comparison of clinical 6 MV X-rays and (137)Cs
title Characterization of relative biological effectiveness for conventional radiation therapy: a comparison of clinical 6 MV X-rays and (137)Cs
title_full Characterization of relative biological effectiveness for conventional radiation therapy: a comparison of clinical 6 MV X-rays and (137)Cs
title_fullStr Characterization of relative biological effectiveness for conventional radiation therapy: a comparison of clinical 6 MV X-rays and (137)Cs
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of relative biological effectiveness for conventional radiation therapy: a comparison of clinical 6 MV X-rays and (137)Cs
title_short Characterization of relative biological effectiveness for conventional radiation therapy: a comparison of clinical 6 MV X-rays and (137)Cs
title_sort characterization of relative biological effectiveness for conventional radiation therapy: a comparison of clinical 6 mv x-rays and (137)cs
topic Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5737853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28444207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx018
work_keys_str_mv AT howardmichelle characterizationofrelativebiologicaleffectivenessforconventionalradiationtherapyacomparisonofclinical6mvxraysand137cs
AT beltranchris characterizationofrelativebiologicaleffectivenessforconventionalradiationtherapyacomparisonofclinical6mvxraysand137cs
AT sarkariajann characterizationofrelativebiologicaleffectivenessforconventionalradiationtherapyacomparisonofclinical6mvxraysand137cs
AT hermanmichaelg characterizationofrelativebiologicaleffectivenessforconventionalradiationtherapyacomparisonofclinical6mvxraysand137cs