Cargando…

Advanced multi-loop algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best

Algorithmic prediction of RNA secondary structure has been an area of active inquiry since the 1970s. Despite many innovations since then, our best techniques are not yet perfect. The workhorses of the RNA secondary structure prediction engine are recursions first described by Zuker and Stiegler in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ward, Max, Datta, Amitava, Wise, Michael, Mathews, David H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
RNA
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5737859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28586479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx512
_version_ 1783287586402336768
author Ward, Max
Datta, Amitava
Wise, Michael
Mathews, David H.
author_facet Ward, Max
Datta, Amitava
Wise, Michael
Mathews, David H.
author_sort Ward, Max
collection PubMed
description Algorithmic prediction of RNA secondary structure has been an area of active inquiry since the 1970s. Despite many innovations since then, our best techniques are not yet perfect. The workhorses of the RNA secondary structure prediction engine are recursions first described by Zuker and Stiegler in 1981. These have well understood caveats; a notable flaw is the ad-hoc treatment of multi-loops, also called helical-junctions, that persists today. While several advanced models for multi-loops have been proposed, it seems to have been assumed that incorporating them into the recursions would lead to intractability, and so no algorithms for these models exist. Some of these models include the classical model based on Jacobson–Stockmayer polymer theory, and another by Aalberts and Nadagopal that incorporates two-length-scale polymer physics. We have realized practical, tractable algorithms for each of these models. However, after implementing these algorithms, we found that no advanced model was better than the original, ad-hoc model used for multi-loops. While this is unexpected, it supports the praxis of the current model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5737859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57378592018-01-04 Advanced multi-loop algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best Ward, Max Datta, Amitava Wise, Michael Mathews, David H. Nucleic Acids Res RNA Algorithmic prediction of RNA secondary structure has been an area of active inquiry since the 1970s. Despite many innovations since then, our best techniques are not yet perfect. The workhorses of the RNA secondary structure prediction engine are recursions first described by Zuker and Stiegler in 1981. These have well understood caveats; a notable flaw is the ad-hoc treatment of multi-loops, also called helical-junctions, that persists today. While several advanced models for multi-loops have been proposed, it seems to have been assumed that incorporating them into the recursions would lead to intractability, and so no algorithms for these models exist. Some of these models include the classical model based on Jacobson–Stockmayer polymer theory, and another by Aalberts and Nadagopal that incorporates two-length-scale polymer physics. We have realized practical, tractable algorithms for each of these models. However, after implementing these algorithms, we found that no advanced model was better than the original, ad-hoc model used for multi-loops. While this is unexpected, it supports the praxis of the current model. Oxford University Press 2017-08-21 2017-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5737859/ /pubmed/28586479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx512 Text en © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle RNA
Ward, Max
Datta, Amitava
Wise, Michael
Mathews, David H.
Advanced multi-loop algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best
title Advanced multi-loop algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best
title_full Advanced multi-loop algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best
title_fullStr Advanced multi-loop algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best
title_full_unstemmed Advanced multi-loop algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best
title_short Advanced multi-loop algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best
title_sort advanced multi-loop algorithms for rna secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best
topic RNA
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5737859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28586479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx512
work_keys_str_mv AT wardmax advancedmultiloopalgorithmsforrnasecondarystructurepredictionrevealthatthesimplestmodelisbest
AT dattaamitava advancedmultiloopalgorithmsforrnasecondarystructurepredictionrevealthatthesimplestmodelisbest
AT wisemichael advancedmultiloopalgorithmsforrnasecondarystructurepredictionrevealthatthesimplestmodelisbest
AT mathewsdavidh advancedmultiloopalgorithmsforrnasecondarystructurepredictionrevealthatthesimplestmodelisbest