Cargando…
Advanced multi-loop algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best
Algorithmic prediction of RNA secondary structure has been an area of active inquiry since the 1970s. Despite many innovations since then, our best techniques are not yet perfect. The workhorses of the RNA secondary structure prediction engine are recursions first described by Zuker and Stiegler in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5737859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28586479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx512 |
_version_ | 1783287586402336768 |
---|---|
author | Ward, Max Datta, Amitava Wise, Michael Mathews, David H. |
author_facet | Ward, Max Datta, Amitava Wise, Michael Mathews, David H. |
author_sort | Ward, Max |
collection | PubMed |
description | Algorithmic prediction of RNA secondary structure has been an area of active inquiry since the 1970s. Despite many innovations since then, our best techniques are not yet perfect. The workhorses of the RNA secondary structure prediction engine are recursions first described by Zuker and Stiegler in 1981. These have well understood caveats; a notable flaw is the ad-hoc treatment of multi-loops, also called helical-junctions, that persists today. While several advanced models for multi-loops have been proposed, it seems to have been assumed that incorporating them into the recursions would lead to intractability, and so no algorithms for these models exist. Some of these models include the classical model based on Jacobson–Stockmayer polymer theory, and another by Aalberts and Nadagopal that incorporates two-length-scale polymer physics. We have realized practical, tractable algorithms for each of these models. However, after implementing these algorithms, we found that no advanced model was better than the original, ad-hoc model used for multi-loops. While this is unexpected, it supports the praxis of the current model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5737859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57378592018-01-04 Advanced multi-loop algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best Ward, Max Datta, Amitava Wise, Michael Mathews, David H. Nucleic Acids Res RNA Algorithmic prediction of RNA secondary structure has been an area of active inquiry since the 1970s. Despite many innovations since then, our best techniques are not yet perfect. The workhorses of the RNA secondary structure prediction engine are recursions first described by Zuker and Stiegler in 1981. These have well understood caveats; a notable flaw is the ad-hoc treatment of multi-loops, also called helical-junctions, that persists today. While several advanced models for multi-loops have been proposed, it seems to have been assumed that incorporating them into the recursions would lead to intractability, and so no algorithms for these models exist. Some of these models include the classical model based on Jacobson–Stockmayer polymer theory, and another by Aalberts and Nadagopal that incorporates two-length-scale polymer physics. We have realized practical, tractable algorithms for each of these models. However, after implementing these algorithms, we found that no advanced model was better than the original, ad-hoc model used for multi-loops. While this is unexpected, it supports the praxis of the current model. Oxford University Press 2017-08-21 2017-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5737859/ /pubmed/28586479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx512 Text en © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | RNA Ward, Max Datta, Amitava Wise, Michael Mathews, David H. Advanced multi-loop algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best |
title | Advanced multi-loop algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best |
title_full | Advanced multi-loop algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best |
title_fullStr | Advanced multi-loop algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best |
title_full_unstemmed | Advanced multi-loop algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best |
title_short | Advanced multi-loop algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best |
title_sort | advanced multi-loop algorithms for rna secondary structure prediction reveal that the simplest model is best |
topic | RNA |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5737859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28586479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx512 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wardmax advancedmultiloopalgorithmsforrnasecondarystructurepredictionrevealthatthesimplestmodelisbest AT dattaamitava advancedmultiloopalgorithmsforrnasecondarystructurepredictionrevealthatthesimplestmodelisbest AT wisemichael advancedmultiloopalgorithmsforrnasecondarystructurepredictionrevealthatthesimplestmodelisbest AT mathewsdavidh advancedmultiloopalgorithmsforrnasecondarystructurepredictionrevealthatthesimplestmodelisbest |