Cargando…

Mortality reductions due to mammography screening: Contemporary population-based data

Our objective was to compare breast cancer mortality in two regions of the Republic of Ireland that introduced a screening programme eight years apart, and to estimate the steady-state mortality deficits the programme will produce. We carried out age- and year-matched between-region comparison of br...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanley, James A., Hannigan, Ailish, O’Brien, Katie M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5737972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29261685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188947
_version_ 1783287603015974912
author Hanley, James A.
Hannigan, Ailish
O’Brien, Katie M.
author_facet Hanley, James A.
Hannigan, Ailish
O’Brien, Katie M.
author_sort Hanley, James A.
collection PubMed
description Our objective was to compare breast cancer mortality in two regions of the Republic of Ireland that introduced a screening programme eight years apart, and to estimate the steady-state mortality deficits the programme will produce. We carried out age- and year-matched between-region comparison of breast cancer mortality rates, and of incidence rates of stage 2–4 breast cancer, in the eligible cohorts. The regions comprised counties that, beginning in early 2000 (region 1) and late 2007 (region 2), invited women aged 50–64 to biennial mammography screening. The data were supplied by the National Cancer Registry, Central Statistics Office. As impact measures, we used age-and-year-matched mortality (from breast cancers diagnosed from 2000 onwards), rate ratios and incidence rate ratios in the compared regions from 2000 to 2013. Ratios were adjusted for between-region differences in background rates. In cohorts too old to be invited, death rates in regions 1 and 2 were 702 per 0.91 and 727 per 0.90 million women-years respectively (Ratio 0.96). In the eligible cohorts, they were 1027 per 2.9 and 1095 per 2.67 (Ratio 0.88). Thus, rates in cohorts that could have benefitted were 9% lower in region 1 than region 2: (95%CI: -20%, +4%). The incidence rates of stage 2–4 breast cancer were 7% lower in region 2 than region 1 over the entire 14 year period, and 20% lower in 2007, i.e., before the screening in region 2 began to narrow the difference. Since mortality reductions due to screening only manifest after several years, the full impact of screening has not yet been realized in region 1. The lower rate observed in that region is a conservative estimate of the steady state benefit. Additional deaths would have been averted had screening continued beyond age 64.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5737972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57379722017-12-29 Mortality reductions due to mammography screening: Contemporary population-based data Hanley, James A. Hannigan, Ailish O’Brien, Katie M. PLoS One Research Article Our objective was to compare breast cancer mortality in two regions of the Republic of Ireland that introduced a screening programme eight years apart, and to estimate the steady-state mortality deficits the programme will produce. We carried out age- and year-matched between-region comparison of breast cancer mortality rates, and of incidence rates of stage 2–4 breast cancer, in the eligible cohorts. The regions comprised counties that, beginning in early 2000 (region 1) and late 2007 (region 2), invited women aged 50–64 to biennial mammography screening. The data were supplied by the National Cancer Registry, Central Statistics Office. As impact measures, we used age-and-year-matched mortality (from breast cancers diagnosed from 2000 onwards), rate ratios and incidence rate ratios in the compared regions from 2000 to 2013. Ratios were adjusted for between-region differences in background rates. In cohorts too old to be invited, death rates in regions 1 and 2 were 702 per 0.91 and 727 per 0.90 million women-years respectively (Ratio 0.96). In the eligible cohorts, they were 1027 per 2.9 and 1095 per 2.67 (Ratio 0.88). Thus, rates in cohorts that could have benefitted were 9% lower in region 1 than region 2: (95%CI: -20%, +4%). The incidence rates of stage 2–4 breast cancer were 7% lower in region 2 than region 1 over the entire 14 year period, and 20% lower in 2007, i.e., before the screening in region 2 began to narrow the difference. Since mortality reductions due to screening only manifest after several years, the full impact of screening has not yet been realized in region 1. The lower rate observed in that region is a conservative estimate of the steady state benefit. Additional deaths would have been averted had screening continued beyond age 64. Public Library of Science 2017-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5737972/ /pubmed/29261685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188947 Text en © 2017 Hanley et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hanley, James A.
Hannigan, Ailish
O’Brien, Katie M.
Mortality reductions due to mammography screening: Contemporary population-based data
title Mortality reductions due to mammography screening: Contemporary population-based data
title_full Mortality reductions due to mammography screening: Contemporary population-based data
title_fullStr Mortality reductions due to mammography screening: Contemporary population-based data
title_full_unstemmed Mortality reductions due to mammography screening: Contemporary population-based data
title_short Mortality reductions due to mammography screening: Contemporary population-based data
title_sort mortality reductions due to mammography screening: contemporary population-based data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5737972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29261685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188947
work_keys_str_mv AT hanleyjamesa mortalityreductionsduetomammographyscreeningcontemporarypopulationbaseddata
AT hanniganailish mortalityreductionsduetomammographyscreeningcontemporarypopulationbaseddata
AT obrienkatiem mortalityreductionsduetomammographyscreeningcontemporarypopulationbaseddata