Cargando…
Gain +1 or Avoid −1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ)
BACKGROUND: The Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ) assesses regulatory promotion and prevention focus, which represent orientations towards gains or losses. The main objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the newly translated German version. METHODS: A sample of 1024...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29258582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-017-0207-y |
_version_ | 1783287617748467712 |
---|---|
author | Schmalbach, Bjarne Zenger, Markus Spina, Roy Steffens-Guerra, Ileana Kliem, Sören Michaelides, Michalis Hinz, Andreas |
author_facet | Schmalbach, Bjarne Zenger, Markus Spina, Roy Steffens-Guerra, Ileana Kliem, Sören Michaelides, Michalis Hinz, Andreas |
author_sort | Schmalbach, Bjarne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ) assesses regulatory promotion and prevention focus, which represent orientations towards gains or losses. The main objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the newly translated German version. METHODS: A sample of 1024 participants answered the questionnaire and several related instruments. We used an online survey tool to collect this data. Data analysis was conducted using methods of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in SPSS and AMOS. RESULTS: The RFQ displayed acceptable reliability, while its correlations with other, related psychological constructs indicated good validity. Factor analysis showed good fit for a two-dimensional model. Tests of measurement invariance revealed clear evidence for metric invariance while scalar invariance remained uncertain. Differences in regulatory focus based on sociodemographic characteristics are reported and discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the RFQ can be recommended for application in fields dealing with motivation and goal attainment in a broad sense. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5738042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57380422017-12-22 Gain +1 or Avoid −1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ) Schmalbach, Bjarne Zenger, Markus Spina, Roy Steffens-Guerra, Ileana Kliem, Sören Michaelides, Michalis Hinz, Andreas BMC Psychol Research Article BACKGROUND: The Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ) assesses regulatory promotion and prevention focus, which represent orientations towards gains or losses. The main objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the newly translated German version. METHODS: A sample of 1024 participants answered the questionnaire and several related instruments. We used an online survey tool to collect this data. Data analysis was conducted using methods of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in SPSS and AMOS. RESULTS: The RFQ displayed acceptable reliability, while its correlations with other, related psychological constructs indicated good validity. Factor analysis showed good fit for a two-dimensional model. Tests of measurement invariance revealed clear evidence for metric invariance while scalar invariance remained uncertain. Differences in regulatory focus based on sociodemographic characteristics are reported and discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the RFQ can be recommended for application in fields dealing with motivation and goal attainment in a broad sense. BioMed Central 2017-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5738042/ /pubmed/29258582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-017-0207-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schmalbach, Bjarne Zenger, Markus Spina, Roy Steffens-Guerra, Ileana Kliem, Sören Michaelides, Michalis Hinz, Andreas Gain +1 or Avoid −1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ) |
title | Gain +1 or Avoid −1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ) |
title_full | Gain +1 or Avoid −1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ) |
title_fullStr | Gain +1 or Avoid −1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ) |
title_full_unstemmed | Gain +1 or Avoid −1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ) |
title_short | Gain +1 or Avoid −1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ) |
title_sort | gain +1 or avoid −1: validation of the german regulatory focus questionnaire (rfq) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29258582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-017-0207-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmalbachbjarne gain1oravoid1validationofthegermanregulatoryfocusquestionnairerfq AT zengermarkus gain1oravoid1validationofthegermanregulatoryfocusquestionnairerfq AT spinaroy gain1oravoid1validationofthegermanregulatoryfocusquestionnairerfq AT steffensguerraileana gain1oravoid1validationofthegermanregulatoryfocusquestionnairerfq AT kliemsoren gain1oravoid1validationofthegermanregulatoryfocusquestionnairerfq AT michaelidesmichalis gain1oravoid1validationofthegermanregulatoryfocusquestionnairerfq AT hinzandreas gain1oravoid1validationofthegermanregulatoryfocusquestionnairerfq |