Cargando…

Gain +1 or Avoid −1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ)

BACKGROUND: The Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ) assesses regulatory promotion and prevention focus, which represent orientations towards gains or losses. The main objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the newly translated German version. METHODS: A sample of 1024...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmalbach, Bjarne, Zenger, Markus, Spina, Roy, Steffens-Guerra, Ileana, Kliem, Sören, Michaelides, Michalis, Hinz, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29258582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-017-0207-y
_version_ 1783287617748467712
author Schmalbach, Bjarne
Zenger, Markus
Spina, Roy
Steffens-Guerra, Ileana
Kliem, Sören
Michaelides, Michalis
Hinz, Andreas
author_facet Schmalbach, Bjarne
Zenger, Markus
Spina, Roy
Steffens-Guerra, Ileana
Kliem, Sören
Michaelides, Michalis
Hinz, Andreas
author_sort Schmalbach, Bjarne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ) assesses regulatory promotion and prevention focus, which represent orientations towards gains or losses. The main objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the newly translated German version. METHODS: A sample of 1024 participants answered the questionnaire and several related instruments. We used an online survey tool to collect this data. Data analysis was conducted using methods of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in SPSS and AMOS. RESULTS: The RFQ displayed acceptable reliability, while its correlations with other, related psychological constructs indicated good validity. Factor analysis showed good fit for a two-dimensional model. Tests of measurement invariance revealed clear evidence for metric invariance while scalar invariance remained uncertain. Differences in regulatory focus based on sociodemographic characteristics are reported and discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the RFQ can be recommended for application in fields dealing with motivation and goal attainment in a broad sense.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5738042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57380422017-12-22 Gain +1 or Avoid −1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ) Schmalbach, Bjarne Zenger, Markus Spina, Roy Steffens-Guerra, Ileana Kliem, Sören Michaelides, Michalis Hinz, Andreas BMC Psychol Research Article BACKGROUND: The Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ) assesses regulatory promotion and prevention focus, which represent orientations towards gains or losses. The main objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the newly translated German version. METHODS: A sample of 1024 participants answered the questionnaire and several related instruments. We used an online survey tool to collect this data. Data analysis was conducted using methods of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in SPSS and AMOS. RESULTS: The RFQ displayed acceptable reliability, while its correlations with other, related psychological constructs indicated good validity. Factor analysis showed good fit for a two-dimensional model. Tests of measurement invariance revealed clear evidence for metric invariance while scalar invariance remained uncertain. Differences in regulatory focus based on sociodemographic characteristics are reported and discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the RFQ can be recommended for application in fields dealing with motivation and goal attainment in a broad sense. BioMed Central 2017-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5738042/ /pubmed/29258582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-017-0207-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schmalbach, Bjarne
Zenger, Markus
Spina, Roy
Steffens-Guerra, Ileana
Kliem, Sören
Michaelides, Michalis
Hinz, Andreas
Gain +1 or Avoid −1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ)
title Gain +1 or Avoid −1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ)
title_full Gain +1 or Avoid −1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ)
title_fullStr Gain +1 or Avoid −1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ)
title_full_unstemmed Gain +1 or Avoid −1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ)
title_short Gain +1 or Avoid −1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ)
title_sort gain +1 or avoid −1: validation of the german regulatory focus questionnaire (rfq)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29258582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-017-0207-y
work_keys_str_mv AT schmalbachbjarne gain1oravoid1validationofthegermanregulatoryfocusquestionnairerfq
AT zengermarkus gain1oravoid1validationofthegermanregulatoryfocusquestionnairerfq
AT spinaroy gain1oravoid1validationofthegermanregulatoryfocusquestionnairerfq
AT steffensguerraileana gain1oravoid1validationofthegermanregulatoryfocusquestionnairerfq
AT kliemsoren gain1oravoid1validationofthegermanregulatoryfocusquestionnairerfq
AT michaelidesmichalis gain1oravoid1validationofthegermanregulatoryfocusquestionnairerfq
AT hinzandreas gain1oravoid1validationofthegermanregulatoryfocusquestionnairerfq