Cargando…
Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis
BACKGROUND: Despite the widely known benefits of exercise and physical activity, adherence rates to these activities are poor. Understanding exercise facilitators, barriers, and preferences may provide an opportunity to personalize exercise prescription and improve adherence. The purpose of this stu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29258503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5 |
_version_ | 1783287636403683328 |
---|---|
author | Rodrigues, Isabel B. Adachi, Jonathan D. Beattie, Karen A. MacDermid, Joy C. |
author_facet | Rodrigues, Isabel B. Adachi, Jonathan D. Beattie, Karen A. MacDermid, Joy C. |
author_sort | Rodrigues, Isabel B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the widely known benefits of exercise and physical activity, adherence rates to these activities are poor. Understanding exercise facilitators, barriers, and preferences may provide an opportunity to personalize exercise prescription and improve adherence. The purpose of this study was to develop the Personalized Exercise Questionnaire (PEQ) to identify these facilitators, barriers, and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis. METHODS: This study comprises two phases, instrument design and judgmental evidence. A panel of 42 experts was used to validate the instrument through quantitative (content validity) and qualitative (cognitive interviewing) methods. Content Validity Index (CVI) is the most commonly used method to calculate content validity quantitatively. There are two kinds of CVI: Item-CVI (I-CVI) and Scale-level CVI (S-CVI). RESULTS: Preliminary versions of this tool showed high content validity of individual items (I-CVI range: 0.50 to 1.00) and moderate to high overall content validity of the PEQ (S-CVI/UA = 0.63; S-CVI/Ave = 0.91). Through qualitative methods, items were improved until saturation was achieved. The tool consists of 6 domains and 38 questions. The 6 domains are: 1) support network; 2) access; 3) goals; 4) preferences; 5) feedback and tracking; and 6) barriers. There are 35 categorical questions and 3 open-ended items. CONCLUSIONS: Using an iterative approach, the development and evaluation of the PEQ demonstrated high item-content validity for assessing the facilitators, barriers, and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis. Upon further validation it is expected that this measure might be used to develop more client-centered exercise programs, and potentially improve adherence. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5738121 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57381212017-12-21 Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis Rodrigues, Isabel B. Adachi, Jonathan D. Beattie, Karen A. MacDermid, Joy C. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite the widely known benefits of exercise and physical activity, adherence rates to these activities are poor. Understanding exercise facilitators, barriers, and preferences may provide an opportunity to personalize exercise prescription and improve adherence. The purpose of this study was to develop the Personalized Exercise Questionnaire (PEQ) to identify these facilitators, barriers, and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis. METHODS: This study comprises two phases, instrument design and judgmental evidence. A panel of 42 experts was used to validate the instrument through quantitative (content validity) and qualitative (cognitive interviewing) methods. Content Validity Index (CVI) is the most commonly used method to calculate content validity quantitatively. There are two kinds of CVI: Item-CVI (I-CVI) and Scale-level CVI (S-CVI). RESULTS: Preliminary versions of this tool showed high content validity of individual items (I-CVI range: 0.50 to 1.00) and moderate to high overall content validity of the PEQ (S-CVI/UA = 0.63; S-CVI/Ave = 0.91). Through qualitative methods, items were improved until saturation was achieved. The tool consists of 6 domains and 38 questions. The 6 domains are: 1) support network; 2) access; 3) goals; 4) preferences; 5) feedback and tracking; and 6) barriers. There are 35 categorical questions and 3 open-ended items. CONCLUSIONS: Using an iterative approach, the development and evaluation of the PEQ demonstrated high item-content validity for assessing the facilitators, barriers, and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis. Upon further validation it is expected that this measure might be used to develop more client-centered exercise programs, and potentially improve adherence. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5738121/ /pubmed/29258503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rodrigues, Isabel B. Adachi, Jonathan D. Beattie, Karen A. MacDermid, Joy C. Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis |
title | Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis |
title_full | Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis |
title_short | Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis |
title_sort | development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29258503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodriguesisabelb developmentandvalidationofanewtooltomeasurethefacilitatorsbarriersandpreferencestoexerciseinpeoplewithosteoporosis AT adachijonathand developmentandvalidationofanewtooltomeasurethefacilitatorsbarriersandpreferencestoexerciseinpeoplewithosteoporosis AT beattiekarena developmentandvalidationofanewtooltomeasurethefacilitatorsbarriersandpreferencestoexerciseinpeoplewithosteoporosis AT macdermidjoyc developmentandvalidationofanewtooltomeasurethefacilitatorsbarriersandpreferencestoexerciseinpeoplewithosteoporosis |