Cargando…

The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes

Violations of rules and regulations in research can cause significant problems for human participants, animal subjects, data integrity, institutions, and investigators. The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program (PI Program) provides remediation training that addresses the root causes of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DuBois, James M., Chibnall, John T., Tait, Raymond, Vander Wal, Jillon S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published for the Association of American Medical Colleges by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001804
_version_ 1783287664031563776
author DuBois, James M.
Chibnall, John T.
Tait, Raymond
Vander Wal, Jillon S.
author_facet DuBois, James M.
Chibnall, John T.
Tait, Raymond
Vander Wal, Jillon S.
author_sort DuBois, James M.
collection PubMed
description Violations of rules and regulations in research can cause significant problems for human participants, animal subjects, data integrity, institutions, and investigators. The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program (PI Program) provides remediation training that addresses the root causes of violations of rules and regulations in research. Through assessments, a three-day workshop, and follow-up coaching calls, the PI Program teaches evidence-based decision-making strategies designed to help researchers to compensate for bias, uncertainty, and work-related stress, and foster the skills needed to oversee research projects in today’s complex regulatory environments. Across its first three years (2013–2015), the program trained 39 researchers from 24 different institutions in the United States. Participant evaluations of the program’s faculty and workshop content were highly positive (4.7–4.8 and 4.5–4.6, respectively, on a 5-point scale). Preliminary program outcome assessment using validated measures of professional decision making and cognitive distortions in a pre- and postworkshop design indicated significant improvements. A follow-up survey of participants found statistically significant increases in a variety of target behaviors, including training research staff members to foster compliance and research quality, using standard operating procedures to support compliance and research integrity, performing self-audits of research operations, reducing job stressors, actively overseeing the work of the research team, and seeking help when experiencing uncertainty. Assessment of the PI Program was conducted with modest sample sizes, yet evaluation, outcome assessment, and self-reported survey data provided statistically significant evidence of effectiveness in achieving program goals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5738297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Published for the Association of American Medical Colleges by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57382972018-04-27 The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes DuBois, James M. Chibnall, John T. Tait, Raymond Vander Wal, Jillon S. Acad Med Articles Violations of rules and regulations in research can cause significant problems for human participants, animal subjects, data integrity, institutions, and investigators. The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program (PI Program) provides remediation training that addresses the root causes of violations of rules and regulations in research. Through assessments, a three-day workshop, and follow-up coaching calls, the PI Program teaches evidence-based decision-making strategies designed to help researchers to compensate for bias, uncertainty, and work-related stress, and foster the skills needed to oversee research projects in today’s complex regulatory environments. Across its first three years (2013–2015), the program trained 39 researchers from 24 different institutions in the United States. Participant evaluations of the program’s faculty and workshop content were highly positive (4.7–4.8 and 4.5–4.6, respectively, on a 5-point scale). Preliminary program outcome assessment using validated measures of professional decision making and cognitive distortions in a pre- and postworkshop design indicated significant improvements. A follow-up survey of participants found statistically significant increases in a variety of target behaviors, including training research staff members to foster compliance and research quality, using standard operating procedures to support compliance and research integrity, performing self-audits of research operations, reducing job stressors, actively overseeing the work of the research team, and seeking help when experiencing uncertainty. Assessment of the PI Program was conducted with modest sample sizes, yet evaluation, outcome assessment, and self-reported survey data provided statistically significant evidence of effectiveness in achieving program goals. Published for the Association of American Medical Colleges by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-04 2017-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5738297/ /pubmed/28640035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001804 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of American Medical Colleges. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Articles
DuBois, James M.
Chibnall, John T.
Tait, Raymond
Vander Wal, Jillon S.
The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes
title The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes
title_full The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes
title_fullStr The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes
title_short The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes
title_sort professionalism and integrity in research program: description and preliminary outcomes
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001804
work_keys_str_mv AT duboisjamesm theprofessionalismandintegrityinresearchprogramdescriptionandpreliminaryoutcomes
AT chibnalljohnt theprofessionalismandintegrityinresearchprogramdescriptionandpreliminaryoutcomes
AT taitraymond theprofessionalismandintegrityinresearchprogramdescriptionandpreliminaryoutcomes
AT vanderwaljillons theprofessionalismandintegrityinresearchprogramdescriptionandpreliminaryoutcomes
AT duboisjamesm professionalismandintegrityinresearchprogramdescriptionandpreliminaryoutcomes
AT chibnalljohnt professionalismandintegrityinresearchprogramdescriptionandpreliminaryoutcomes
AT taitraymond professionalismandintegrityinresearchprogramdescriptionandpreliminaryoutcomes
AT vanderwaljillons professionalismandintegrityinresearchprogramdescriptionandpreliminaryoutcomes