Cargando…
The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes
Violations of rules and regulations in research can cause significant problems for human participants, animal subjects, data integrity, institutions, and investigators. The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program (PI Program) provides remediation training that addresses the root causes of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published for the Association of American Medical Colleges by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001804 |
_version_ | 1783287664031563776 |
---|---|
author | DuBois, James M. Chibnall, John T. Tait, Raymond Vander Wal, Jillon S. |
author_facet | DuBois, James M. Chibnall, John T. Tait, Raymond Vander Wal, Jillon S. |
author_sort | DuBois, James M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Violations of rules and regulations in research can cause significant problems for human participants, animal subjects, data integrity, institutions, and investigators. The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program (PI Program) provides remediation training that addresses the root causes of violations of rules and regulations in research. Through assessments, a three-day workshop, and follow-up coaching calls, the PI Program teaches evidence-based decision-making strategies designed to help researchers to compensate for bias, uncertainty, and work-related stress, and foster the skills needed to oversee research projects in today’s complex regulatory environments. Across its first three years (2013–2015), the program trained 39 researchers from 24 different institutions in the United States. Participant evaluations of the program’s faculty and workshop content were highly positive (4.7–4.8 and 4.5–4.6, respectively, on a 5-point scale). Preliminary program outcome assessment using validated measures of professional decision making and cognitive distortions in a pre- and postworkshop design indicated significant improvements. A follow-up survey of participants found statistically significant increases in a variety of target behaviors, including training research staff members to foster compliance and research quality, using standard operating procedures to support compliance and research integrity, performing self-audits of research operations, reducing job stressors, actively overseeing the work of the research team, and seeking help when experiencing uncertainty. Assessment of the PI Program was conducted with modest sample sizes, yet evaluation, outcome assessment, and self-reported survey data provided statistically significant evidence of effectiveness in achieving program goals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5738297 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Published for the Association of American Medical Colleges by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57382972018-04-27 The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes DuBois, James M. Chibnall, John T. Tait, Raymond Vander Wal, Jillon S. Acad Med Articles Violations of rules and regulations in research can cause significant problems for human participants, animal subjects, data integrity, institutions, and investigators. The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program (PI Program) provides remediation training that addresses the root causes of violations of rules and regulations in research. Through assessments, a three-day workshop, and follow-up coaching calls, the PI Program teaches evidence-based decision-making strategies designed to help researchers to compensate for bias, uncertainty, and work-related stress, and foster the skills needed to oversee research projects in today’s complex regulatory environments. Across its first three years (2013–2015), the program trained 39 researchers from 24 different institutions in the United States. Participant evaluations of the program’s faculty and workshop content were highly positive (4.7–4.8 and 4.5–4.6, respectively, on a 5-point scale). Preliminary program outcome assessment using validated measures of professional decision making and cognitive distortions in a pre- and postworkshop design indicated significant improvements. A follow-up survey of participants found statistically significant increases in a variety of target behaviors, including training research staff members to foster compliance and research quality, using standard operating procedures to support compliance and research integrity, performing self-audits of research operations, reducing job stressors, actively overseeing the work of the research team, and seeking help when experiencing uncertainty. Assessment of the PI Program was conducted with modest sample sizes, yet evaluation, outcome assessment, and self-reported survey data provided statistically significant evidence of effectiveness in achieving program goals. Published for the Association of American Medical Colleges by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-04 2017-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5738297/ /pubmed/28640035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001804 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of American Medical Colleges. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Articles DuBois, James M. Chibnall, John T. Tait, Raymond Vander Wal, Jillon S. The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes |
title | The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes |
title_full | The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes |
title_fullStr | The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes |
title_short | The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes |
title_sort | professionalism and integrity in research program: description and preliminary outcomes |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001804 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duboisjamesm theprofessionalismandintegrityinresearchprogramdescriptionandpreliminaryoutcomes AT chibnalljohnt theprofessionalismandintegrityinresearchprogramdescriptionandpreliminaryoutcomes AT taitraymond theprofessionalismandintegrityinresearchprogramdescriptionandpreliminaryoutcomes AT vanderwaljillons theprofessionalismandintegrityinresearchprogramdescriptionandpreliminaryoutcomes AT duboisjamesm professionalismandintegrityinresearchprogramdescriptionandpreliminaryoutcomes AT chibnalljohnt professionalismandintegrityinresearchprogramdescriptionandpreliminaryoutcomes AT taitraymond professionalismandintegrityinresearchprogramdescriptionandpreliminaryoutcomes AT vanderwaljillons professionalismandintegrityinresearchprogramdescriptionandpreliminaryoutcomes |