Cargando…

Intensive spa and exercise therapy program for returning to work for low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial

We aimed to determine whether a 5-day intensive inpatient spa and exercise therapy and educational program is more effective than usual care in improving the rate of returning to work at 1 year for patients with subacute and chronic low back pain (LBP) on sick leave for 4 to 24 weeks. We conducted a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Christelle, Boutron, Isabelle, Rein, Christopher, Baron, Gabriel, Sanchez, Katherine, Palazzo, Clémence, Dupeyron, Arnaud, Tessier, Jean-Max, Coudeyre, Emmanuel, Eschalier, Bénédicte, Forestier, Romain, Roques-Latrille, Christian-François, Attal, Ygal, Lefèvre-Colau, Marie-Martine, Rannou, François, Poiraudeau, Serge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29263353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18311-z
Descripción
Sumario:We aimed to determine whether a 5-day intensive inpatient spa and exercise therapy and educational program is more effective than usual care in improving the rate of returning to work at 1 year for patients with subacute and chronic low back pain (LBP) on sick leave for 4 to 24 weeks. We conducted a 12-month randomized controlled trial. LBP patients were assigned to 5-day spa (2 hr/day), exercise (30 min/day) and education (45 min/day) or to usual care. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients returning to work at 1 year after randomization. Secondary outcomes were pain, disability and health-related quality of life at 1 year and number of sick leave days from 6 to 12 months. The projected recruitment was not achieved. Only 88/700 (12.6%) patients planned were enrolled: 45 in the spa therapy group and 43 in the usual care group. At 1 year, returning to work was 56.3% versus 41.9% (OR 1.69 [95% CI 0.60–4.73], p = 0.32) respectively. There was no significant difference for any of the secondary outcomes. However, our study lacked power.