Cargando…
Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial
BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation was examined among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) Pilot Trial of low-dose CT screening. METHODS: High-risk individuals aged 50–75 years who completed baseline questionnaires were randomised to CT screening (intervention) or usual care (no...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28710339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209690 |
_version_ | 1783287712337362944 |
---|---|
author | Brain, Kate Carter, Ben Lifford, Kate J Burke, Olivia Devaraj, Anand Baldwin, David R Duffy, Stephen Field, John K |
author_facet | Brain, Kate Carter, Ben Lifford, Kate J Burke, Olivia Devaraj, Anand Baldwin, David R Duffy, Stephen Field, John K |
author_sort | Brain, Kate |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation was examined among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) Pilot Trial of low-dose CT screening. METHODS: High-risk individuals aged 50–75 years who completed baseline questionnaires were randomised to CT screening (intervention) or usual care (no screening control). Smoking habit was determined at baseline using self-report. Smokers were asked whether they had quit smoking since joining UKLS at T(1) (2 weeks after baseline scan results or control assignment) and T(2) (up to 2 years after recruitment). Intention-to-treat (ITT) regression analyses were undertaken, adjusting for baseline lung cancer distress, trial site and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: Of a total 4055 individuals randomised to CT screening or control, 1546 were baseline smokers (759 intervention, 787 control). Smoking cessation rates were 8% (control n=36/479) versus 14% (intervention n=75/527) at T(1) and 21% (control n=79/377) versus 24% (intervention n=115/488) at T(2). ITT analyses indicated that the odds of quitting among screened participants were significantly higher at T(1) (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.38, 95% CI 1.56 to 3.64, p<0.001) and T(2) (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.18, p=0.003) compared with control. Intervention participants who needed additional clinical investigation were more likely to quit in the longer term compared with the control group (aOR 2.29, 95% CI 1.62 to 3.22, p=0.007) and those receiving a negative result (aOR 2.43, 95% CI 1.54 to 3.84, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CT lung cancer screening for high-risk participants presents a teachable moment for smoking cessation, especially among those who receive a positive scan result. Further behavioural research is needed to evaluate optimal strategies for integrating smoking cessation intervention with stratified lung cancer screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Results, ISRCTN 78513845 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5738533 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57385332018-01-03 Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial Brain, Kate Carter, Ben Lifford, Kate J Burke, Olivia Devaraj, Anand Baldwin, David R Duffy, Stephen Field, John K Thorax Lung Cancer BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation was examined among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) Pilot Trial of low-dose CT screening. METHODS: High-risk individuals aged 50–75 years who completed baseline questionnaires were randomised to CT screening (intervention) or usual care (no screening control). Smoking habit was determined at baseline using self-report. Smokers were asked whether they had quit smoking since joining UKLS at T(1) (2 weeks after baseline scan results or control assignment) and T(2) (up to 2 years after recruitment). Intention-to-treat (ITT) regression analyses were undertaken, adjusting for baseline lung cancer distress, trial site and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: Of a total 4055 individuals randomised to CT screening or control, 1546 were baseline smokers (759 intervention, 787 control). Smoking cessation rates were 8% (control n=36/479) versus 14% (intervention n=75/527) at T(1) and 21% (control n=79/377) versus 24% (intervention n=115/488) at T(2). ITT analyses indicated that the odds of quitting among screened participants were significantly higher at T(1) (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.38, 95% CI 1.56 to 3.64, p<0.001) and T(2) (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.18, p=0.003) compared with control. Intervention participants who needed additional clinical investigation were more likely to quit in the longer term compared with the control group (aOR 2.29, 95% CI 1.62 to 3.22, p=0.007) and those receiving a negative result (aOR 2.43, 95% CI 1.54 to 3.84, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CT lung cancer screening for high-risk participants presents a teachable moment for smoking cessation, especially among those who receive a positive scan result. Further behavioural research is needed to evaluate optimal strategies for integrating smoking cessation intervention with stratified lung cancer screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Results, ISRCTN 78513845 BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5738533/ /pubmed/28710339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209690 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Lung Cancer Brain, Kate Carter, Ben Lifford, Kate J Burke, Olivia Devaraj, Anand Baldwin, David R Duffy, Stephen Field, John K Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial |
title | Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial |
title_full | Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial |
title_fullStr | Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial |
title_short | Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial |
title_sort | impact of low-dose ct screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the uk lung cancer screening trial |
topic | Lung Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28710339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209690 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brainkate impactoflowdosectscreeningonsmokingcessationamonghighriskparticipantsintheuklungcancerscreeningtrial AT carterben impactoflowdosectscreeningonsmokingcessationamonghighriskparticipantsintheuklungcancerscreeningtrial AT liffordkatej impactoflowdosectscreeningonsmokingcessationamonghighriskparticipantsintheuklungcancerscreeningtrial AT burkeolivia impactoflowdosectscreeningonsmokingcessationamonghighriskparticipantsintheuklungcancerscreeningtrial AT devarajanand impactoflowdosectscreeningonsmokingcessationamonghighriskparticipantsintheuklungcancerscreeningtrial AT baldwindavidr impactoflowdosectscreeningonsmokingcessationamonghighriskparticipantsintheuklungcancerscreeningtrial AT duffystephen impactoflowdosectscreeningonsmokingcessationamonghighriskparticipantsintheuklungcancerscreeningtrial AT fieldjohnk impactoflowdosectscreeningonsmokingcessationamonghighriskparticipantsintheuklungcancerscreeningtrial |