Cargando…

Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial

BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation was examined among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) Pilot Trial of low-dose CT screening. METHODS: High-risk individuals aged 50–75 years who completed baseline questionnaires were randomised to CT screening (intervention) or usual care (no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brain, Kate, Carter, Ben, Lifford, Kate J, Burke, Olivia, Devaraj, Anand, Baldwin, David R, Duffy, Stephen, Field, John K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28710339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209690
_version_ 1783287712337362944
author Brain, Kate
Carter, Ben
Lifford, Kate J
Burke, Olivia
Devaraj, Anand
Baldwin, David R
Duffy, Stephen
Field, John K
author_facet Brain, Kate
Carter, Ben
Lifford, Kate J
Burke, Olivia
Devaraj, Anand
Baldwin, David R
Duffy, Stephen
Field, John K
author_sort Brain, Kate
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation was examined among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) Pilot Trial of low-dose CT screening. METHODS: High-risk individuals aged 50–75 years who completed baseline questionnaires were randomised to CT screening (intervention) or usual care (no screening control). Smoking habit was determined at baseline using self-report. Smokers were asked whether they had quit smoking since joining UKLS at T(1) (2 weeks after baseline scan results or control assignment) and T(2) (up to 2 years after recruitment). Intention-to-treat (ITT) regression analyses were undertaken, adjusting for baseline lung cancer distress, trial site and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: Of a total 4055 individuals randomised to CT screening or control, 1546 were baseline smokers (759 intervention, 787 control). Smoking cessation rates were 8% (control n=36/479) versus 14% (intervention n=75/527) at T(1) and 21% (control n=79/377) versus 24% (intervention n=115/488) at T(2). ITT analyses indicated that the odds of quitting among screened participants were significantly higher at T(1) (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.38, 95% CI 1.56 to 3.64, p<0.001) and T(2) (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.18, p=0.003) compared with control. Intervention participants who needed additional clinical investigation were more likely to quit in the longer term compared with the control group (aOR 2.29, 95% CI 1.62 to 3.22, p=0.007) and those receiving a negative result (aOR 2.43, 95% CI 1.54 to 3.84, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CT lung cancer screening for high-risk participants presents a teachable moment for smoking cessation, especially among those who receive a positive scan result. Further behavioural research is needed to evaluate optimal strategies for integrating smoking cessation intervention with stratified lung cancer screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Results, ISRCTN 78513845
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5738533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57385332018-01-03 Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial Brain, Kate Carter, Ben Lifford, Kate J Burke, Olivia Devaraj, Anand Baldwin, David R Duffy, Stephen Field, John K Thorax Lung Cancer BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation was examined among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) Pilot Trial of low-dose CT screening. METHODS: High-risk individuals aged 50–75 years who completed baseline questionnaires were randomised to CT screening (intervention) or usual care (no screening control). Smoking habit was determined at baseline using self-report. Smokers were asked whether they had quit smoking since joining UKLS at T(1) (2 weeks after baseline scan results or control assignment) and T(2) (up to 2 years after recruitment). Intention-to-treat (ITT) regression analyses were undertaken, adjusting for baseline lung cancer distress, trial site and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: Of a total 4055 individuals randomised to CT screening or control, 1546 were baseline smokers (759 intervention, 787 control). Smoking cessation rates were 8% (control n=36/479) versus 14% (intervention n=75/527) at T(1) and 21% (control n=79/377) versus 24% (intervention n=115/488) at T(2). ITT analyses indicated that the odds of quitting among screened participants were significantly higher at T(1) (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.38, 95% CI 1.56 to 3.64, p<0.001) and T(2) (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.18, p=0.003) compared with control. Intervention participants who needed additional clinical investigation were more likely to quit in the longer term compared with the control group (aOR 2.29, 95% CI 1.62 to 3.22, p=0.007) and those receiving a negative result (aOR 2.43, 95% CI 1.54 to 3.84, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CT lung cancer screening for high-risk participants presents a teachable moment for smoking cessation, especially among those who receive a positive scan result. Further behavioural research is needed to evaluate optimal strategies for integrating smoking cessation intervention with stratified lung cancer screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Results, ISRCTN 78513845 BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5738533/ /pubmed/28710339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209690 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Lung Cancer
Brain, Kate
Carter, Ben
Lifford, Kate J
Burke, Olivia
Devaraj, Anand
Baldwin, David R
Duffy, Stephen
Field, John K
Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial
title Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial
title_full Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial
title_fullStr Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial
title_short Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial
title_sort impact of low-dose ct screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the uk lung cancer screening trial
topic Lung Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28710339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209690
work_keys_str_mv AT brainkate impactoflowdosectscreeningonsmokingcessationamonghighriskparticipantsintheuklungcancerscreeningtrial
AT carterben impactoflowdosectscreeningonsmokingcessationamonghighriskparticipantsintheuklungcancerscreeningtrial
AT liffordkatej impactoflowdosectscreeningonsmokingcessationamonghighriskparticipantsintheuklungcancerscreeningtrial
AT burkeolivia impactoflowdosectscreeningonsmokingcessationamonghighriskparticipantsintheuklungcancerscreeningtrial
AT devarajanand impactoflowdosectscreeningonsmokingcessationamonghighriskparticipantsintheuklungcancerscreeningtrial
AT baldwindavidr impactoflowdosectscreeningonsmokingcessationamonghighriskparticipantsintheuklungcancerscreeningtrial
AT duffystephen impactoflowdosectscreeningonsmokingcessationamonghighriskparticipantsintheuklungcancerscreeningtrial
AT fieldjohnk impactoflowdosectscreeningonsmokingcessationamonghighriskparticipantsintheuklungcancerscreeningtrial