Cargando…
16S pan-bacterial PCR can accurately identify patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a challenge to intensive care units, with secure diagnosis relying on microbiological cultures that take up to 72 hours to provide a result. We sought to derive and validate a novel, real-time 16S rRNA gene PCR for rapid exclusion of VAP. Bronchoalveolar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27974525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209065 |
_version_ | 1783287713747697664 |
---|---|
author | Conway Morris, Andrew Gadsby, Naomi McKenna, James P Hellyer, Thomas P Dark, Paul Singh, Suveer Walsh, Timothy S McAuley, Danny F Templeton, Kate Simpson, A John McMullan, Ronan |
author_facet | Conway Morris, Andrew Gadsby, Naomi McKenna, James P Hellyer, Thomas P Dark, Paul Singh, Suveer Walsh, Timothy S McAuley, Danny F Templeton, Kate Simpson, A John McMullan, Ronan |
author_sort | Conway Morris, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a challenge to intensive care units, with secure diagnosis relying on microbiological cultures that take up to 72 hours to provide a result. We sought to derive and validate a novel, real-time 16S rRNA gene PCR for rapid exclusion of VAP. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was obtained from two independent cohorts of patients with suspected VAP. Patients were recruited in a 2-centre derivation cohort and a 12-centre confirmation cohort. Confirmed VAP was defined as growth of >10(4) colony forming units/ml on semiquantitative culture and compared with a 16S PCR assay. Samples were tested from 67 patients in the derivation cohort, 10 (15%) of whom had confirmed VAP. Using cycles to cross threshold (C(t)) values as the result of the 16S PCR test, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUROC) was 0.94 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.0, p<0.0001). Samples from 92 patients were available from the confirmation cohort, 26 (28%) of whom had confirmed VAP. The AUROC for C(t) in this cohort was 0.89 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.95, p<0.0001). This study has derived and assessed the diagnostic accuracy of a novel application for 16S PCR. This suggests that 16S PCR in BAL could be used as a rapid test in suspected VAP and may allow better stewardship of antibiotics. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: VAPRAPID trial ref NCT01972425. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5738539 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57385392018-01-03 16S pan-bacterial PCR can accurately identify patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia Conway Morris, Andrew Gadsby, Naomi McKenna, James P Hellyer, Thomas P Dark, Paul Singh, Suveer Walsh, Timothy S McAuley, Danny F Templeton, Kate Simpson, A John McMullan, Ronan Thorax Research Letter Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a challenge to intensive care units, with secure diagnosis relying on microbiological cultures that take up to 72 hours to provide a result. We sought to derive and validate a novel, real-time 16S rRNA gene PCR for rapid exclusion of VAP. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was obtained from two independent cohorts of patients with suspected VAP. Patients were recruited in a 2-centre derivation cohort and a 12-centre confirmation cohort. Confirmed VAP was defined as growth of >10(4) colony forming units/ml on semiquantitative culture and compared with a 16S PCR assay. Samples were tested from 67 patients in the derivation cohort, 10 (15%) of whom had confirmed VAP. Using cycles to cross threshold (C(t)) values as the result of the 16S PCR test, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUROC) was 0.94 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.0, p<0.0001). Samples from 92 patients were available from the confirmation cohort, 26 (28%) of whom had confirmed VAP. The AUROC for C(t) in this cohort was 0.89 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.95, p<0.0001). This study has derived and assessed the diagnostic accuracy of a novel application for 16S PCR. This suggests that 16S PCR in BAL could be used as a rapid test in suspected VAP and may allow better stewardship of antibiotics. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: VAPRAPID trial ref NCT01972425. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11 2016-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5738539/ /pubmed/27974525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209065 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Letter Conway Morris, Andrew Gadsby, Naomi McKenna, James P Hellyer, Thomas P Dark, Paul Singh, Suveer Walsh, Timothy S McAuley, Danny F Templeton, Kate Simpson, A John McMullan, Ronan 16S pan-bacterial PCR can accurately identify patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia |
title | 16S pan-bacterial PCR can accurately identify patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia |
title_full | 16S pan-bacterial PCR can accurately identify patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia |
title_fullStr | 16S pan-bacterial PCR can accurately identify patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia |
title_full_unstemmed | 16S pan-bacterial PCR can accurately identify patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia |
title_short | 16S pan-bacterial PCR can accurately identify patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia |
title_sort | 16s pan-bacterial pcr can accurately identify patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia |
topic | Research Letter |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27974525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT conwaymorrisandrew 16spanbacterialpcrcanaccuratelyidentifypatientswithventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT gadsbynaomi 16spanbacterialpcrcanaccuratelyidentifypatientswithventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT mckennajamesp 16spanbacterialpcrcanaccuratelyidentifypatientswithventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT hellyerthomasp 16spanbacterialpcrcanaccuratelyidentifypatientswithventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT darkpaul 16spanbacterialpcrcanaccuratelyidentifypatientswithventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT singhsuveer 16spanbacterialpcrcanaccuratelyidentifypatientswithventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT walshtimothys 16spanbacterialpcrcanaccuratelyidentifypatientswithventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT mcauleydannyf 16spanbacterialpcrcanaccuratelyidentifypatientswithventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT templetonkate 16spanbacterialpcrcanaccuratelyidentifypatientswithventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT simpsonajohn 16spanbacterialpcrcanaccuratelyidentifypatientswithventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT mcmullanronan 16spanbacterialpcrcanaccuratelyidentifypatientswithventilatorassociatedpneumonia |