Cargando…

Partner notification and partner treatment for chlamydia: attitude and practice of general practitioners in the Netherlands; a landscape analysis

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia prevalence remains high despite scaling-up control efforts. Transmission is not effectively interrupted without partner notification (PN) and (timely) partner treatment (PT). In the Netherlands, the follow-up of partners is not standardized and may depend on GPs’ time and prior...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Broek, Ingrid V. F., Donker, Gé A., Hek, Karin, van Bergen, Jan E. A. M., van Benthem, Birgit H. B., Götz, Hannelore M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29262799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0676-3
_version_ 1783287752560738304
author van den Broek, Ingrid V. F.
Donker, Gé A.
Hek, Karin
van Bergen, Jan E. A. M.
van Benthem, Birgit H. B.
Götz, Hannelore M.
author_facet van den Broek, Ingrid V. F.
Donker, Gé A.
Hek, Karin
van Bergen, Jan E. A. M.
van Benthem, Birgit H. B.
Götz, Hannelore M.
author_sort van den Broek, Ingrid V. F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chlamydia prevalence remains high despite scaling-up control efforts. Transmission is not effectively interrupted without partner notification (PN) and (timely) partner treatment (PT). In the Netherlands, the follow-up of partners is not standardized and may depend on GPs’ time and priorities. We investigated current practice and attitude of GPs towards PN and PT to determine the potential for Patient-Initiated Partner Treatment, which is legally not supported yet. METHODS: Multiple data-sources were combined for a landscape analysis. Quantitative data on (potential) PT were obtained from prescriptions in the national pharmacy register (2004–2014) and electronic patient data from NIVEL-Primary Care Database (PCD) and from STI consultations in a subgroup of sentinel practices therein. Furthermore, we collected information on current practice via two short questionnaires at a national GP conference and obtained insight into GPs’ attitudes towards PN/PT in a vignette study among GPs partaking in NIVEL-PCD. RESULTS: Prescription data showed Azithromycin double dosages in 1–2% of cases in the pharmacy register (37.000 per year); probable chlamydia-specific repeated prescriptions or double dosages of other antibiotics in NIVEL-PCD (115/1078) could not be interpreted as PT for chlamydia with certainty. STI consultation data revealed direct PT in 6/100 cases, via partner prescription or double doses. In the questionnaires the large majority of GPs (>95% of 1411) reported to discuss PN of current and ex-partner(s) with chlamydia patients. Direct PT was indicated as most common method by 4% of 271 GPs overall and by 12% for partners registered in the same practice. Usually, GPs leave further steps to the patients (83%), advising patients to tell partners to get tested (56%) or treated (28%). In the vignette study, 16–20% of 268 GPs indicated willingness to provide direct PT, depending on patient/partner profile, more (24–45%) if patients would have the chance to notify their partner first. CONCLUSION: GPs in the Netherlands already treat some partners of chlamydia cases directly, especially partners registered in the same practice. Follow-up of partner notification and treatment in general practice needs more attention. GPs may be open to implement PIPT more often, provided there are clear guidelines to arrange this legally and practically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5738758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57387582017-12-21 Partner notification and partner treatment for chlamydia: attitude and practice of general practitioners in the Netherlands; a landscape analysis van den Broek, Ingrid V. F. Donker, Gé A. Hek, Karin van Bergen, Jan E. A. M. van Benthem, Birgit H. B. Götz, Hannelore M. BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Chlamydia prevalence remains high despite scaling-up control efforts. Transmission is not effectively interrupted without partner notification (PN) and (timely) partner treatment (PT). In the Netherlands, the follow-up of partners is not standardized and may depend on GPs’ time and priorities. We investigated current practice and attitude of GPs towards PN and PT to determine the potential for Patient-Initiated Partner Treatment, which is legally not supported yet. METHODS: Multiple data-sources were combined for a landscape analysis. Quantitative data on (potential) PT were obtained from prescriptions in the national pharmacy register (2004–2014) and electronic patient data from NIVEL-Primary Care Database (PCD) and from STI consultations in a subgroup of sentinel practices therein. Furthermore, we collected information on current practice via two short questionnaires at a national GP conference and obtained insight into GPs’ attitudes towards PN/PT in a vignette study among GPs partaking in NIVEL-PCD. RESULTS: Prescription data showed Azithromycin double dosages in 1–2% of cases in the pharmacy register (37.000 per year); probable chlamydia-specific repeated prescriptions or double dosages of other antibiotics in NIVEL-PCD (115/1078) could not be interpreted as PT for chlamydia with certainty. STI consultation data revealed direct PT in 6/100 cases, via partner prescription or double doses. In the questionnaires the large majority of GPs (>95% of 1411) reported to discuss PN of current and ex-partner(s) with chlamydia patients. Direct PT was indicated as most common method by 4% of 271 GPs overall and by 12% for partners registered in the same practice. Usually, GPs leave further steps to the patients (83%), advising patients to tell partners to get tested (56%) or treated (28%). In the vignette study, 16–20% of 268 GPs indicated willingness to provide direct PT, depending on patient/partner profile, more (24–45%) if patients would have the chance to notify their partner first. CONCLUSION: GPs in the Netherlands already treat some partners of chlamydia cases directly, especially partners registered in the same practice. Follow-up of partner notification and treatment in general practice needs more attention. GPs may be open to implement PIPT more often, provided there are clear guidelines to arrange this legally and practically. BioMed Central 2017-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5738758/ /pubmed/29262799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0676-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
van den Broek, Ingrid V. F.
Donker, Gé A.
Hek, Karin
van Bergen, Jan E. A. M.
van Benthem, Birgit H. B.
Götz, Hannelore M.
Partner notification and partner treatment for chlamydia: attitude and practice of general practitioners in the Netherlands; a landscape analysis
title Partner notification and partner treatment for chlamydia: attitude and practice of general practitioners in the Netherlands; a landscape analysis
title_full Partner notification and partner treatment for chlamydia: attitude and practice of general practitioners in the Netherlands; a landscape analysis
title_fullStr Partner notification and partner treatment for chlamydia: attitude and practice of general practitioners in the Netherlands; a landscape analysis
title_full_unstemmed Partner notification and partner treatment for chlamydia: attitude and practice of general practitioners in the Netherlands; a landscape analysis
title_short Partner notification and partner treatment for chlamydia: attitude and practice of general practitioners in the Netherlands; a landscape analysis
title_sort partner notification and partner treatment for chlamydia: attitude and practice of general practitioners in the netherlands; a landscape analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29262799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0676-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbroekingridvf partnernotificationandpartnertreatmentforchlamydiaattitudeandpracticeofgeneralpractitionersinthenetherlandsalandscapeanalysis
AT donkergea partnernotificationandpartnertreatmentforchlamydiaattitudeandpracticeofgeneralpractitionersinthenetherlandsalandscapeanalysis
AT hekkarin partnernotificationandpartnertreatmentforchlamydiaattitudeandpracticeofgeneralpractitionersinthenetherlandsalandscapeanalysis
AT vanbergenjaneam partnernotificationandpartnertreatmentforchlamydiaattitudeandpracticeofgeneralpractitionersinthenetherlandsalandscapeanalysis
AT vanbenthembirgithb partnernotificationandpartnertreatmentforchlamydiaattitudeandpracticeofgeneralpractitionersinthenetherlandsalandscapeanalysis
AT gotzhannelorem partnernotificationandpartnertreatmentforchlamydiaattitudeandpracticeofgeneralpractitionersinthenetherlandsalandscapeanalysis