Cargando…

Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey - A tool to assess missed nursing care

OBJECTIVE: to analyze the metric validity and reliability properties of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey. METHOD: methodological research conducted by assessing construct validity and reliability via confirmatory factor analysis, known-groups validation, convergent construct validation, analysis of intern...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siqueira, Lillian Dias Castilho, Caliri, Maria Helena Larcher, Haas, Vanderlei José, Kalisch, Beatrice, Dantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29267546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2354.2975
_version_ 1783287791375876096
author Siqueira, Lillian Dias Castilho
Caliri, Maria Helena Larcher
Haas, Vanderlei José
Kalisch, Beatrice
Dantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti
author_facet Siqueira, Lillian Dias Castilho
Caliri, Maria Helena Larcher
Haas, Vanderlei José
Kalisch, Beatrice
Dantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti
author_sort Siqueira, Lillian Dias Castilho
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: to analyze the metric validity and reliability properties of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey. METHOD: methodological research conducted by assessing construct validity and reliability via confirmatory factor analysis, known-groups validation, convergent construct validation, analysis of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The sample consisted of 330 nursing professionals, of whom 86 participated in the retest phase. RESULTS: of the 330 participants, 39.7% were aides, 33% technicians, 20.9% nurses, and 6.4% nurses with administrative roles. Confirmatory factorial analysis demonstrated that the Brazilian Portuguese version of the instrument is adequately adjusted to the dimensional structure the scale authors originally proposed. The correlation between “satisfaction with position/role” and “satisfaction with teamwork” and the survey’s missed care variables was moderate (Spearman’s coefficient =0.35; p<0.001). The results of the Student’s t-test indicated known-group validity. Professionals from closed units reported lower levels of missed care in comparison with the other units. The reliability showed a strong correlation, with the exception of “institutional management/leadership style” (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.15; p=0.04). The internal consistency was adequate (Cronbach’s alpha was greater than 0.70). CONCLUSION: the MISSCARE-BRASIL was valid and reliable in the group studied. The application of the MISSCARE-BRASIL can contribute to identifying solutions for missed nursing care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5738959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57389592018-01-02 Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey - A tool to assess missed nursing care Siqueira, Lillian Dias Castilho Caliri, Maria Helena Larcher Haas, Vanderlei José Kalisch, Beatrice Dantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Original Article OBJECTIVE: to analyze the metric validity and reliability properties of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey. METHOD: methodological research conducted by assessing construct validity and reliability via confirmatory factor analysis, known-groups validation, convergent construct validation, analysis of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The sample consisted of 330 nursing professionals, of whom 86 participated in the retest phase. RESULTS: of the 330 participants, 39.7% were aides, 33% technicians, 20.9% nurses, and 6.4% nurses with administrative roles. Confirmatory factorial analysis demonstrated that the Brazilian Portuguese version of the instrument is adequately adjusted to the dimensional structure the scale authors originally proposed. The correlation between “satisfaction with position/role” and “satisfaction with teamwork” and the survey’s missed care variables was moderate (Spearman’s coefficient =0.35; p<0.001). The results of the Student’s t-test indicated known-group validity. Professionals from closed units reported lower levels of missed care in comparison with the other units. The reliability showed a strong correlation, with the exception of “institutional management/leadership style” (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.15; p=0.04). The internal consistency was adequate (Cronbach’s alpha was greater than 0.70). CONCLUSION: the MISSCARE-BRASIL was valid and reliable in the group studied. The application of the MISSCARE-BRASIL can contribute to identifying solutions for missed nursing care. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2017-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5738959/ /pubmed/29267546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2354.2975 Text en Copyright © 2017 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
Siqueira, Lillian Dias Castilho
Caliri, Maria Helena Larcher
Haas, Vanderlei José
Kalisch, Beatrice
Dantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti
Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey - A tool to assess missed nursing care
title Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey - A tool to assess missed nursing care
title_full Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey - A tool to assess missed nursing care
title_fullStr Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey - A tool to assess missed nursing care
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey - A tool to assess missed nursing care
title_short Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey - A tool to assess missed nursing care
title_sort validation of the misscare-brasil survey - a tool to assess missed nursing care
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29267546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2354.2975
work_keys_str_mv AT siqueiralilliandiascastilho validationofthemisscarebrasilsurveyatooltoassessmissednursingcare
AT calirimariahelenalarcher validationofthemisscarebrasilsurveyatooltoassessmissednursingcare
AT haasvanderleijose validationofthemisscarebrasilsurveyatooltoassessmissednursingcare
AT kalischbeatrice validationofthemisscarebrasilsurveyatooltoassessmissednursingcare
AT dantasrosanaaparecidaspadoti validationofthemisscarebrasilsurveyatooltoassessmissednursingcare