Cargando…
Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey - A tool to assess missed nursing care
OBJECTIVE: to analyze the metric validity and reliability properties of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey. METHOD: methodological research conducted by assessing construct validity and reliability via confirmatory factor analysis, known-groups validation, convergent construct validation, analysis of intern...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São
Paulo
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29267546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2354.2975 |
_version_ | 1783287791375876096 |
---|---|
author | Siqueira, Lillian Dias Castilho Caliri, Maria Helena Larcher Haas, Vanderlei José Kalisch, Beatrice Dantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti |
author_facet | Siqueira, Lillian Dias Castilho Caliri, Maria Helena Larcher Haas, Vanderlei José Kalisch, Beatrice Dantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti |
author_sort | Siqueira, Lillian Dias Castilho |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: to analyze the metric validity and reliability properties of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey. METHOD: methodological research conducted by assessing construct validity and reliability via confirmatory factor analysis, known-groups validation, convergent construct validation, analysis of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The sample consisted of 330 nursing professionals, of whom 86 participated in the retest phase. RESULTS: of the 330 participants, 39.7% were aides, 33% technicians, 20.9% nurses, and 6.4% nurses with administrative roles. Confirmatory factorial analysis demonstrated that the Brazilian Portuguese version of the instrument is adequately adjusted to the dimensional structure the scale authors originally proposed. The correlation between “satisfaction with position/role” and “satisfaction with teamwork” and the survey’s missed care variables was moderate (Spearman’s coefficient =0.35; p<0.001). The results of the Student’s t-test indicated known-group validity. Professionals from closed units reported lower levels of missed care in comparison with the other units. The reliability showed a strong correlation, with the exception of “institutional management/leadership style” (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.15; p=0.04). The internal consistency was adequate (Cronbach’s alpha was greater than 0.70). CONCLUSION: the MISSCARE-BRASIL was valid and reliable in the group studied. The application of the MISSCARE-BRASIL can contribute to identifying solutions for missed nursing care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5738959 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São
Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57389592018-01-02 Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey - A tool to assess missed nursing care Siqueira, Lillian Dias Castilho Caliri, Maria Helena Larcher Haas, Vanderlei José Kalisch, Beatrice Dantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Original Article OBJECTIVE: to analyze the metric validity and reliability properties of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey. METHOD: methodological research conducted by assessing construct validity and reliability via confirmatory factor analysis, known-groups validation, convergent construct validation, analysis of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The sample consisted of 330 nursing professionals, of whom 86 participated in the retest phase. RESULTS: of the 330 participants, 39.7% were aides, 33% technicians, 20.9% nurses, and 6.4% nurses with administrative roles. Confirmatory factorial analysis demonstrated that the Brazilian Portuguese version of the instrument is adequately adjusted to the dimensional structure the scale authors originally proposed. The correlation between “satisfaction with position/role” and “satisfaction with teamwork” and the survey’s missed care variables was moderate (Spearman’s coefficient =0.35; p<0.001). The results of the Student’s t-test indicated known-group validity. Professionals from closed units reported lower levels of missed care in comparison with the other units. The reliability showed a strong correlation, with the exception of “institutional management/leadership style” (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.15; p=0.04). The internal consistency was adequate (Cronbach’s alpha was greater than 0.70). CONCLUSION: the MISSCARE-BRASIL was valid and reliable in the group studied. The application of the MISSCARE-BRASIL can contribute to identifying solutions for missed nursing care. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2017-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5738959/ /pubmed/29267546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2354.2975 Text en Copyright © 2017 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Original Article Siqueira, Lillian Dias Castilho Caliri, Maria Helena Larcher Haas, Vanderlei José Kalisch, Beatrice Dantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey - A tool to assess missed nursing care |
title | Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey - A tool to assess missed
nursing care
|
title_full | Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey - A tool to assess missed
nursing care
|
title_fullStr | Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey - A tool to assess missed
nursing care
|
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey - A tool to assess missed
nursing care
|
title_short | Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey - A tool to assess missed
nursing care
|
title_sort | validation of the misscare-brasil survey - a tool to assess missed
nursing care |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29267546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2354.2975 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT siqueiralilliandiascastilho validationofthemisscarebrasilsurveyatooltoassessmissednursingcare AT calirimariahelenalarcher validationofthemisscarebrasilsurveyatooltoassessmissednursingcare AT haasvanderleijose validationofthemisscarebrasilsurveyatooltoassessmissednursingcare AT kalischbeatrice validationofthemisscarebrasilsurveyatooltoassessmissednursingcare AT dantasrosanaaparecidaspadoti validationofthemisscarebrasilsurveyatooltoassessmissednursingcare |