Cargando…

Using a Whole Person Approach to Support People With Cancer: A Longitudinal, Mixed-Methods Service Evaluation

Introduction. Improved models of care are needed to meet all the support needs of people with cancer, which encompass psychological, emotional, physical, spiritual, sexual, occupational, social and existential needs. The aim of this article is to (a) evaluate short- and long-term impacts of using a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polley, Marie J., Jolliffe, Rachel, Boxell, Emily, Zollman, Catherine, Jackson, Sarah, Seers, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5739159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27060342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534735416632060
_version_ 1783287817139388416
author Polley, Marie J.
Jolliffe, Rachel
Boxell, Emily
Zollman, Catherine
Jackson, Sarah
Seers, Helen
author_facet Polley, Marie J.
Jolliffe, Rachel
Boxell, Emily
Zollman, Catherine
Jackson, Sarah
Seers, Helen
author_sort Polley, Marie J.
collection PubMed
description Introduction. Improved models of care are needed to meet all the support needs of people with cancer, which encompass psychological, emotional, physical, spiritual, sexual, occupational, social and existential needs. The aim of this article is to (a) evaluate short- and long-term impacts of using a whole person approach to support people with cancer on the Living Well with the Impact of Cancer Course (LWC) and (b) use these data to inform strategic decisions about future service provision at Penny Brohn UK. Methods. Longitudinal mixed-methods service evaluation (n = 135). Data collected included health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (FACIT-SpEx); Concerns (types and severity–MYCaW); lifestyle behavior (bespoke questionnaire), and participants’ experiences over 12 months postcourse. Results. Statistically and clinically significant improvements from baseline to 12 months in severity of MYCaW Concerns (n = 64; P < .000) and mean total HRQoL (n = 66; P < .000). The majority of MYCaW concerns were “psychological and emotional” and about participants’ well-being. Spiritual, emotional, and functional well-being contributed most to HRQoL improvements at 12 months. Barriers to maintaining healthy lifestyle changes included lack of support from family and friends, time constraints, and returning to work. Three to 6 months postcourse was identified as the time when more support was most likely to be needed. Conclusions. Using a whole person approach for the LWC enabled the needs of participants to be met, and statistically and clinically significant improvements in HRQoL and MYCaW Concerns were reported. Qualitative data analysis explored how experiencing whole person support enabled participants to make and sustain healthy lifestyle changes associated with improved survivorship. Barriers experienced to making health behavior change were also identified. These data then informed wider and more person-centered clinical provision to increase the maintenance of positive long-term behavior changes. Comparison of whole person approaches to cancer treatment and support and standard care are now urgently needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5739159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57391592018-01-10 Using a Whole Person Approach to Support People With Cancer: A Longitudinal, Mixed-Methods Service Evaluation Polley, Marie J. Jolliffe, Rachel Boxell, Emily Zollman, Catherine Jackson, Sarah Seers, Helen Integr Cancer Ther Research Articles Introduction. Improved models of care are needed to meet all the support needs of people with cancer, which encompass psychological, emotional, physical, spiritual, sexual, occupational, social and existential needs. The aim of this article is to (a) evaluate short- and long-term impacts of using a whole person approach to support people with cancer on the Living Well with the Impact of Cancer Course (LWC) and (b) use these data to inform strategic decisions about future service provision at Penny Brohn UK. Methods. Longitudinal mixed-methods service evaluation (n = 135). Data collected included health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (FACIT-SpEx); Concerns (types and severity–MYCaW); lifestyle behavior (bespoke questionnaire), and participants’ experiences over 12 months postcourse. Results. Statistically and clinically significant improvements from baseline to 12 months in severity of MYCaW Concerns (n = 64; P < .000) and mean total HRQoL (n = 66; P < .000). The majority of MYCaW concerns were “psychological and emotional” and about participants’ well-being. Spiritual, emotional, and functional well-being contributed most to HRQoL improvements at 12 months. Barriers to maintaining healthy lifestyle changes included lack of support from family and friends, time constraints, and returning to work. Three to 6 months postcourse was identified as the time when more support was most likely to be needed. Conclusions. Using a whole person approach for the LWC enabled the needs of participants to be met, and statistically and clinically significant improvements in HRQoL and MYCaW Concerns were reported. Qualitative data analysis explored how experiencing whole person support enabled participants to make and sustain healthy lifestyle changes associated with improved survivorship. Barriers experienced to making health behavior change were also identified. These data then informed wider and more person-centered clinical provision to increase the maintenance of positive long-term behavior changes. Comparison of whole person approaches to cancer treatment and support and standard care are now urgently needed. SAGE Publications 2016-04-09 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5739159/ /pubmed/27060342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534735416632060 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Polley, Marie J.
Jolliffe, Rachel
Boxell, Emily
Zollman, Catherine
Jackson, Sarah
Seers, Helen
Using a Whole Person Approach to Support People With Cancer: A Longitudinal, Mixed-Methods Service Evaluation
title Using a Whole Person Approach to Support People With Cancer: A Longitudinal, Mixed-Methods Service Evaluation
title_full Using a Whole Person Approach to Support People With Cancer: A Longitudinal, Mixed-Methods Service Evaluation
title_fullStr Using a Whole Person Approach to Support People With Cancer: A Longitudinal, Mixed-Methods Service Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Using a Whole Person Approach to Support People With Cancer: A Longitudinal, Mixed-Methods Service Evaluation
title_short Using a Whole Person Approach to Support People With Cancer: A Longitudinal, Mixed-Methods Service Evaluation
title_sort using a whole person approach to support people with cancer: a longitudinal, mixed-methods service evaluation
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5739159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27060342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534735416632060
work_keys_str_mv AT polleymariej usingawholepersonapproachtosupportpeoplewithcanceralongitudinalmixedmethodsserviceevaluation
AT jollifferachel usingawholepersonapproachtosupportpeoplewithcanceralongitudinalmixedmethodsserviceevaluation
AT boxellemily usingawholepersonapproachtosupportpeoplewithcanceralongitudinalmixedmethodsserviceevaluation
AT zollmancatherine usingawholepersonapproachtosupportpeoplewithcanceralongitudinalmixedmethodsserviceevaluation
AT jacksonsarah usingawholepersonapproachtosupportpeoplewithcanceralongitudinalmixedmethodsserviceevaluation
AT seershelen usingawholepersonapproachtosupportpeoplewithcanceralongitudinalmixedmethodsserviceevaluation