Cargando…

Wikipedia as a gateway to biomedical research: The relative distribution and use of citations in the English Wikipedia

Wikipedia is a gateway to knowledge. However, the extent to which this gateway ends at Wikipedia or continues via supporting citations is unknown. Wikipedia’s gateway functionality has implications for information design and education, notably in medicine. This study aims to establish benchmarks for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maggio, Lauren A., Willinsky, John M., Steinberg, Ryan M., Mietchen, Daniel, Wass, Joseph L., Dong, Ting
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5739466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29267345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190046
_version_ 1783287874569895936
author Maggio, Lauren A.
Willinsky, John M.
Steinberg, Ryan M.
Mietchen, Daniel
Wass, Joseph L.
Dong, Ting
author_facet Maggio, Lauren A.
Willinsky, John M.
Steinberg, Ryan M.
Mietchen, Daniel
Wass, Joseph L.
Dong, Ting
author_sort Maggio, Lauren A.
collection PubMed
description Wikipedia is a gateway to knowledge. However, the extent to which this gateway ends at Wikipedia or continues via supporting citations is unknown. Wikipedia’s gateway functionality has implications for information design and education, notably in medicine. This study aims to establish benchmarks for the relative distribution and referral (click) rate of citations—as indicated by presence of a Digital Object Identifier (DOI)—from Wikipedia, with a focus on medical citations. DOIs referred from the English Wikipedia in August 2016 were obtained from Crossref.org. Next, based on a DOI’s presence on a WikiProject Medicine page, all DOIs in Wikipedia were categorized as medical (WP:MED) or non-medical (non-WP:MED). Using this categorization, referred DOIs were classified as WP:MED, non-WP:MED, or BOTH, meaning the DOI may have been referred from either category. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Out of 5.2 million Wikipedia pages, 4.42% (n = 229,857) included at least one DOI. 68,870 were identified as WP:MED, with 22.14% (n = 15,250) featuring one or more DOIs. WP:MED pages featured on average 8.88 DOI citations per page, whereas non-WP:MED pages had on average 4.28 DOI citations. For DOIs only on WP:MED pages, a DOI was referred every 2,283 pageviews and for non-WP:MED pages every 2,467 pageviews. DOIs from BOTH pages accounted for 12% (n = 58,475). The referral of DOI citations found in BOTH could not be assigned to WP:MED or non-WP:MED, as the page from which the referral was made was not provided with the data. While these results cannot provide evidence of greater citation referral from WP:MED than non-WP:MED, they do provide benchmarks to assess strategies for changing referral patterns. These changes might include editors adopting new methods for designing and presenting citations or the introduction of teaching strategies that address the value of consulting citations as a tool for extending learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5739466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57394662018-01-10 Wikipedia as a gateway to biomedical research: The relative distribution and use of citations in the English Wikipedia Maggio, Lauren A. Willinsky, John M. Steinberg, Ryan M. Mietchen, Daniel Wass, Joseph L. Dong, Ting PLoS One Research Article Wikipedia is a gateway to knowledge. However, the extent to which this gateway ends at Wikipedia or continues via supporting citations is unknown. Wikipedia’s gateway functionality has implications for information design and education, notably in medicine. This study aims to establish benchmarks for the relative distribution and referral (click) rate of citations—as indicated by presence of a Digital Object Identifier (DOI)—from Wikipedia, with a focus on medical citations. DOIs referred from the English Wikipedia in August 2016 were obtained from Crossref.org. Next, based on a DOI’s presence on a WikiProject Medicine page, all DOIs in Wikipedia were categorized as medical (WP:MED) or non-medical (non-WP:MED). Using this categorization, referred DOIs were classified as WP:MED, non-WP:MED, or BOTH, meaning the DOI may have been referred from either category. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Out of 5.2 million Wikipedia pages, 4.42% (n = 229,857) included at least one DOI. 68,870 were identified as WP:MED, with 22.14% (n = 15,250) featuring one or more DOIs. WP:MED pages featured on average 8.88 DOI citations per page, whereas non-WP:MED pages had on average 4.28 DOI citations. For DOIs only on WP:MED pages, a DOI was referred every 2,283 pageviews and for non-WP:MED pages every 2,467 pageviews. DOIs from BOTH pages accounted for 12% (n = 58,475). The referral of DOI citations found in BOTH could not be assigned to WP:MED or non-WP:MED, as the page from which the referral was made was not provided with the data. While these results cannot provide evidence of greater citation referral from WP:MED than non-WP:MED, they do provide benchmarks to assess strategies for changing referral patterns. These changes might include editors adopting new methods for designing and presenting citations or the introduction of teaching strategies that address the value of consulting citations as a tool for extending learning. Public Library of Science 2017-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5739466/ /pubmed/29267345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190046 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Maggio, Lauren A.
Willinsky, John M.
Steinberg, Ryan M.
Mietchen, Daniel
Wass, Joseph L.
Dong, Ting
Wikipedia as a gateway to biomedical research: The relative distribution and use of citations in the English Wikipedia
title Wikipedia as a gateway to biomedical research: The relative distribution and use of citations in the English Wikipedia
title_full Wikipedia as a gateway to biomedical research: The relative distribution and use of citations in the English Wikipedia
title_fullStr Wikipedia as a gateway to biomedical research: The relative distribution and use of citations in the English Wikipedia
title_full_unstemmed Wikipedia as a gateway to biomedical research: The relative distribution and use of citations in the English Wikipedia
title_short Wikipedia as a gateway to biomedical research: The relative distribution and use of citations in the English Wikipedia
title_sort wikipedia as a gateway to biomedical research: the relative distribution and use of citations in the english wikipedia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5739466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29267345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190046
work_keys_str_mv AT maggiolaurena wikipediaasagatewaytobiomedicalresearchtherelativedistributionanduseofcitationsintheenglishwikipedia
AT willinskyjohnm wikipediaasagatewaytobiomedicalresearchtherelativedistributionanduseofcitationsintheenglishwikipedia
AT steinbergryanm wikipediaasagatewaytobiomedicalresearchtherelativedistributionanduseofcitationsintheenglishwikipedia
AT mietchendaniel wikipediaasagatewaytobiomedicalresearchtherelativedistributionanduseofcitationsintheenglishwikipedia
AT wassjosephl wikipediaasagatewaytobiomedicalresearchtherelativedistributionanduseofcitationsintheenglishwikipedia
AT dongting wikipediaasagatewaytobiomedicalresearchtherelativedistributionanduseofcitationsintheenglishwikipedia