Cargando…
Relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation of different tumor-size cutoffs with prognostic factors and survival outcomes to provide a reference for the modification of the T-stage classification in the DeOliveira staging system for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5739616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29285229 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22054 |
_version_ | 1783287898962919424 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Hai-Jie Zhou, Rong-Xing Shrestha, Anuj Tan, Yong-Qiong Ma, Wen-Jie Yang, Qin Lu, Jiong Wang, Jun-Ke Zhou, Yong Li, Fu-Yu |
author_facet | Hu, Hai-Jie Zhou, Rong-Xing Shrestha, Anuj Tan, Yong-Qiong Ma, Wen-Jie Yang, Qin Lu, Jiong Wang, Jun-Ke Zhou, Yong Li, Fu-Yu |
author_sort | Hu, Hai-Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation of different tumor-size cutoffs with prognostic factors and survival outcomes to provide a reference for the modification of the T-stage classification in the DeOliveira staging system for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 216 patients who underwent curative surgery for HCCA (mean tumor diameter, 2.8 cm) between 2000 and 2013. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess the correlation of tumor-size cutoffs with various factors. RESULTS: Tumor differentiation (odds ratio [OR]: 1.649, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.065–2.555, P = 0.025), node status (OR: 1.971, 95% CI: 1.060–3.664, P = 0.032), resection margin (OR: 2.465, 95% CI: 1.024–5.937, P = 0.044), and hepatectomy (OR: 2.373, 95% CI: 1.226–4.593, P = 0.01) were independently correlated with the 2-cm cutoff, while tumor differentiation (OR: 1.755, 95% CI: 1.062–2.091, P = 0.028), node status (OR: 2.166, 95% CI: 1.054–4.452, P = 0.035), and tumor margin (OR: 2.539, 95% CI: 1.089–5.919, P = 0.031) were independently associated with the 3-cm cutoff. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-cm and 3-cm cutoffs were strongly correlated with resection margin, node status, tumor differentiation and survival. The 2-cm cutoff may be added to the DeOliveira staging system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5739616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57396162017-12-28 Relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma Hu, Hai-Jie Zhou, Rong-Xing Shrestha, Anuj Tan, Yong-Qiong Ma, Wen-Jie Yang, Qin Lu, Jiong Wang, Jun-Ke Zhou, Yong Li, Fu-Yu Oncotarget Research Paper OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation of different tumor-size cutoffs with prognostic factors and survival outcomes to provide a reference for the modification of the T-stage classification in the DeOliveira staging system for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 216 patients who underwent curative surgery for HCCA (mean tumor diameter, 2.8 cm) between 2000 and 2013. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess the correlation of tumor-size cutoffs with various factors. RESULTS: Tumor differentiation (odds ratio [OR]: 1.649, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.065–2.555, P = 0.025), node status (OR: 1.971, 95% CI: 1.060–3.664, P = 0.032), resection margin (OR: 2.465, 95% CI: 1.024–5.937, P = 0.044), and hepatectomy (OR: 2.373, 95% CI: 1.226–4.593, P = 0.01) were independently correlated with the 2-cm cutoff, while tumor differentiation (OR: 1.755, 95% CI: 1.062–2.091, P = 0.028), node status (OR: 2.166, 95% CI: 1.054–4.452, P = 0.035), and tumor margin (OR: 2.539, 95% CI: 1.089–5.919, P = 0.031) were independently associated with the 3-cm cutoff. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-cm and 3-cm cutoffs were strongly correlated with resection margin, node status, tumor differentiation and survival. The 2-cm cutoff may be added to the DeOliveira staging system. Impact Journals LLC 2017-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5739616/ /pubmed/29285229 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22054 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Hu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Hu, Hai-Jie Zhou, Rong-Xing Shrestha, Anuj Tan, Yong-Qiong Ma, Wen-Jie Yang, Qin Lu, Jiong Wang, Jun-Ke Zhou, Yong Li, Fu-Yu Relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma |
title | Relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma |
title_full | Relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | Relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma |
title_short | Relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma |
title_sort | relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5739616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29285229 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22054 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huhaijie relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT zhourongxing relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT shresthaanuj relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT tanyongqiong relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT mawenjie relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT yangqin relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT lujiong relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT wangjunke relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT zhouyong relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT lifuyu relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma |