Cargando…

Relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation of different tumor-size cutoffs with prognostic factors and survival outcomes to provide a reference for the modification of the T-stage classification in the DeOliveira staging system for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Hai-Jie, Zhou, Rong-Xing, Shrestha, Anuj, Tan, Yong-Qiong, Ma, Wen-Jie, Yang, Qin, Lu, Jiong, Wang, Jun-Ke, Zhou, Yong, Li, Fu-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5739616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29285229
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22054
_version_ 1783287898962919424
author Hu, Hai-Jie
Zhou, Rong-Xing
Shrestha, Anuj
Tan, Yong-Qiong
Ma, Wen-Jie
Yang, Qin
Lu, Jiong
Wang, Jun-Ke
Zhou, Yong
Li, Fu-Yu
author_facet Hu, Hai-Jie
Zhou, Rong-Xing
Shrestha, Anuj
Tan, Yong-Qiong
Ma, Wen-Jie
Yang, Qin
Lu, Jiong
Wang, Jun-Ke
Zhou, Yong
Li, Fu-Yu
author_sort Hu, Hai-Jie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation of different tumor-size cutoffs with prognostic factors and survival outcomes to provide a reference for the modification of the T-stage classification in the DeOliveira staging system for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 216 patients who underwent curative surgery for HCCA (mean tumor diameter, 2.8 cm) between 2000 and 2013. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess the correlation of tumor-size cutoffs with various factors. RESULTS: Tumor differentiation (odds ratio [OR]: 1.649, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.065–2.555, P = 0.025), node status (OR: 1.971, 95% CI: 1.060–3.664, P = 0.032), resection margin (OR: 2.465, 95% CI: 1.024–5.937, P = 0.044), and hepatectomy (OR: 2.373, 95% CI: 1.226–4.593, P = 0.01) were independently correlated with the 2-cm cutoff, while tumor differentiation (OR: 1.755, 95% CI: 1.062–2.091, P = 0.028), node status (OR: 2.166, 95% CI: 1.054–4.452, P = 0.035), and tumor margin (OR: 2.539, 95% CI: 1.089–5.919, P = 0.031) were independently associated with the 3-cm cutoff. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-cm and 3-cm cutoffs were strongly correlated with resection margin, node status, tumor differentiation and survival. The 2-cm cutoff may be added to the DeOliveira staging system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5739616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57396162017-12-28 Relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma Hu, Hai-Jie Zhou, Rong-Xing Shrestha, Anuj Tan, Yong-Qiong Ma, Wen-Jie Yang, Qin Lu, Jiong Wang, Jun-Ke Zhou, Yong Li, Fu-Yu Oncotarget Research Paper OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation of different tumor-size cutoffs with prognostic factors and survival outcomes to provide a reference for the modification of the T-stage classification in the DeOliveira staging system for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 216 patients who underwent curative surgery for HCCA (mean tumor diameter, 2.8 cm) between 2000 and 2013. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess the correlation of tumor-size cutoffs with various factors. RESULTS: Tumor differentiation (odds ratio [OR]: 1.649, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.065–2.555, P = 0.025), node status (OR: 1.971, 95% CI: 1.060–3.664, P = 0.032), resection margin (OR: 2.465, 95% CI: 1.024–5.937, P = 0.044), and hepatectomy (OR: 2.373, 95% CI: 1.226–4.593, P = 0.01) were independently correlated with the 2-cm cutoff, while tumor differentiation (OR: 1.755, 95% CI: 1.062–2.091, P = 0.028), node status (OR: 2.166, 95% CI: 1.054–4.452, P = 0.035), and tumor margin (OR: 2.539, 95% CI: 1.089–5.919, P = 0.031) were independently associated with the 3-cm cutoff. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-cm and 3-cm cutoffs were strongly correlated with resection margin, node status, tumor differentiation and survival. The 2-cm cutoff may be added to the DeOliveira staging system. Impact Journals LLC 2017-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5739616/ /pubmed/29285229 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22054 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Hu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Hu, Hai-Jie
Zhou, Rong-Xing
Shrestha, Anuj
Tan, Yong-Qiong
Ma, Wen-Jie
Yang, Qin
Lu, Jiong
Wang, Jun-Ke
Zhou, Yong
Li, Fu-Yu
Relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
title Relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
title_full Relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
title_fullStr Relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
title_short Relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
title_sort relationship of tumor size with pathological and prognostic factors for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5739616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29285229
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22054
work_keys_str_mv AT huhaijie relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT zhourongxing relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT shresthaanuj relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT tanyongqiong relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT mawenjie relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT yangqin relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT lujiong relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT wangjunke relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT zhouyong relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT lifuyu relationshipoftumorsizewithpathologicalandprognosticfactorsforhilarcholangiocarcinoma