Cargando…
The OlympiAD trial: who won the gold?
OlympiAD was a phase 3 randomized controlled trial of a PARP inhibitor olaparib for metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer patients harboring a BRCA mutation. Although the OlympiAD trial met its primary endpoint, there are concerns regarding whether olaparib truly improves meaningful outcomes for th...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cancer Intelligence
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5739869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29290761 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.ed75 |
_version_ | 1783287959351459840 |
---|---|
author | Gyawali, Bishal |
author_facet | Gyawali, Bishal |
author_sort | Gyawali, Bishal |
collection | PubMed |
description | OlympiAD was a phase 3 randomized controlled trial of a PARP inhibitor olaparib for metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer patients harboring a BRCA mutation. Although the OlympiAD trial met its primary endpoint, there are concerns regarding whether olaparib truly improves meaningful outcomes for these patients. In this editorial, I examine these issues in detail. An exploration of these issues will provide important educational insights for oncologists and cancer policy makers. I conclude that although olaparib seems to have won the Gold with OlympiAD, the patients probably have not. We need to stop celebrating a gold-plated bronze as a true gold so that one day our patients can finally get the gold they deserve. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5739869 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Cancer Intelligence |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57398692017-12-29 The OlympiAD trial: who won the gold? Gyawali, Bishal Ecancermedicalscience Editorial OlympiAD was a phase 3 randomized controlled trial of a PARP inhibitor olaparib for metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer patients harboring a BRCA mutation. Although the OlympiAD trial met its primary endpoint, there are concerns regarding whether olaparib truly improves meaningful outcomes for these patients. In this editorial, I examine these issues in detail. An exploration of these issues will provide important educational insights for oncologists and cancer policy makers. I conclude that although olaparib seems to have won the Gold with OlympiAD, the patients probably have not. We need to stop celebrating a gold-plated bronze as a true gold so that one day our patients can finally get the gold they deserve. Cancer Intelligence 2017-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5739869/ /pubmed/29290761 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.ed75 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Gyawali, Bishal The OlympiAD trial: who won the gold? |
title | The OlympiAD trial: who won the gold? |
title_full | The OlympiAD trial: who won the gold? |
title_fullStr | The OlympiAD trial: who won the gold? |
title_full_unstemmed | The OlympiAD trial: who won the gold? |
title_short | The OlympiAD trial: who won the gold? |
title_sort | olympiad trial: who won the gold? |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5739869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29290761 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.ed75 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gyawalibishal theolympiadtrialwhowonthegold AT gyawalibishal olympiadtrialwhowonthegold |