Cargando…

The OlympiAD trial: who won the gold?

OlympiAD was a phase 3 randomized controlled trial of a PARP inhibitor olaparib for metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer patients harboring a BRCA mutation. Although the OlympiAD trial met its primary endpoint, there are concerns regarding whether olaparib truly improves meaningful outcomes for th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gyawali, Bishal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cancer Intelligence 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5739869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29290761
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.ed75
_version_ 1783287959351459840
author Gyawali, Bishal
author_facet Gyawali, Bishal
author_sort Gyawali, Bishal
collection PubMed
description OlympiAD was a phase 3 randomized controlled trial of a PARP inhibitor olaparib for metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer patients harboring a BRCA mutation. Although the OlympiAD trial met its primary endpoint, there are concerns regarding whether olaparib truly improves meaningful outcomes for these patients. In this editorial, I examine these issues in detail. An exploration of these issues will provide important educational insights for oncologists and cancer policy makers. I conclude that although olaparib seems to have won the Gold with OlympiAD, the patients probably have not. We need to stop celebrating a gold-plated bronze as a true gold so that one day our patients can finally get the gold they deserve.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5739869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cancer Intelligence
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57398692017-12-29 The OlympiAD trial: who won the gold? Gyawali, Bishal Ecancermedicalscience Editorial OlympiAD was a phase 3 randomized controlled trial of a PARP inhibitor olaparib for metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer patients harboring a BRCA mutation. Although the OlympiAD trial met its primary endpoint, there are concerns regarding whether olaparib truly improves meaningful outcomes for these patients. In this editorial, I examine these issues in detail. An exploration of these issues will provide important educational insights for oncologists and cancer policy makers. I conclude that although olaparib seems to have won the Gold with OlympiAD, the patients probably have not. We need to stop celebrating a gold-plated bronze as a true gold so that one day our patients can finally get the gold they deserve. Cancer Intelligence 2017-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5739869/ /pubmed/29290761 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.ed75 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Editorial
Gyawali, Bishal
The OlympiAD trial: who won the gold?
title The OlympiAD trial: who won the gold?
title_full The OlympiAD trial: who won the gold?
title_fullStr The OlympiAD trial: who won the gold?
title_full_unstemmed The OlympiAD trial: who won the gold?
title_short The OlympiAD trial: who won the gold?
title_sort olympiad trial: who won the gold?
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5739869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29290761
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.ed75
work_keys_str_mv AT gyawalibishal theolympiadtrialwhowonthegold
AT gyawalibishal olympiadtrialwhowonthegold