Cargando…

The influence of microvascular injury on native T1 and T2* relaxation values after acute myocardial infarction: implications for non-contrast-enhanced infarct assessment

OBJECTIVES: Native T1 mapping and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging offer detailed characterisation of the myocardium after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We evaluated the effects of microvascular injury (MVI) and intramyocardial haemorrhage on local T1 and T2* values in patients with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robbers, Lourens F. H. J., Nijveldt, Robin, Beek, Aernout M., Teunissen, Paul F. A., Hollander, Maurits R., Biesbroek, P. Stefan, Everaars, Henk, van de Ven, Peter M., Hofman, Mark B. M., van Royen, Niels, van Rossum, Albert C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5740192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28821947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5010-x
_version_ 1783288002158526464
author Robbers, Lourens F. H. J.
Nijveldt, Robin
Beek, Aernout M.
Teunissen, Paul F. A.
Hollander, Maurits R.
Biesbroek, P. Stefan
Everaars, Henk
van de Ven, Peter M.
Hofman, Mark B. M.
van Royen, Niels
van Rossum, Albert C.
author_facet Robbers, Lourens F. H. J.
Nijveldt, Robin
Beek, Aernout M.
Teunissen, Paul F. A.
Hollander, Maurits R.
Biesbroek, P. Stefan
Everaars, Henk
van de Ven, Peter M.
Hofman, Mark B. M.
van Royen, Niels
van Rossum, Albert C.
author_sort Robbers, Lourens F. H. J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Native T1 mapping and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging offer detailed characterisation of the myocardium after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We evaluated the effects of microvascular injury (MVI) and intramyocardial haemorrhage on local T1 and T2* values in patients with a reperfused AMI. METHODS: Forty-three patients after reperfused AMI underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) at 4 [3-5] days, including native MOLLI T1 and T2* mapping, STIR, cine imaging and LGE. T1 and T2* values were determined in LGE-defined regions of interest: the MI core incorporating MVI when present, the core-adjacent MI border zone (without any areas of MVI), and remote myocardium. RESULTS: Average T1 in the MI core was higher than in the MI border zone and remote myocardium. However, in the 20 (47%) patients with MVI, MI core T1 was lower than in patients without MVI (MVI 1048±78ms, no MVI 1111±89ms, p=0.02). MI core T2* was significantly lower in patients with MVI than in those without (MVI 20 [18-23]ms, no MVI 31 [26-39]ms, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The presence of MVI profoundly affects MOLLI-measured native T1 values. T2* mapping suggested that this may be the result of intramyocardial haemorrhage. These findings have important implications for the interpretation of native T1 values shortly after AMI. KEY POINTS: • Microvascular injury after acute myocardial infarction affects local T1 and T2* values. • Infarct zone T1 values are lower if microvascular injury is present. • T2* mapping suggests that low infarct T1 values are likely haemorrhage. • T1 and T2* values are complimentary for correctly assessing post-infarct myocardium. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00330-017-5010-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5740192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57401922018-01-01 The influence of microvascular injury on native T1 and T2* relaxation values after acute myocardial infarction: implications for non-contrast-enhanced infarct assessment Robbers, Lourens F. H. J. Nijveldt, Robin Beek, Aernout M. Teunissen, Paul F. A. Hollander, Maurits R. Biesbroek, P. Stefan Everaars, Henk van de Ven, Peter M. Hofman, Mark B. M. van Royen, Niels van Rossum, Albert C. Eur Radiol Cardiac OBJECTIVES: Native T1 mapping and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging offer detailed characterisation of the myocardium after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We evaluated the effects of microvascular injury (MVI) and intramyocardial haemorrhage on local T1 and T2* values in patients with a reperfused AMI. METHODS: Forty-three patients after reperfused AMI underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) at 4 [3-5] days, including native MOLLI T1 and T2* mapping, STIR, cine imaging and LGE. T1 and T2* values were determined in LGE-defined regions of interest: the MI core incorporating MVI when present, the core-adjacent MI border zone (without any areas of MVI), and remote myocardium. RESULTS: Average T1 in the MI core was higher than in the MI border zone and remote myocardium. However, in the 20 (47%) patients with MVI, MI core T1 was lower than in patients without MVI (MVI 1048±78ms, no MVI 1111±89ms, p=0.02). MI core T2* was significantly lower in patients with MVI than in those without (MVI 20 [18-23]ms, no MVI 31 [26-39]ms, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The presence of MVI profoundly affects MOLLI-measured native T1 values. T2* mapping suggested that this may be the result of intramyocardial haemorrhage. These findings have important implications for the interpretation of native T1 values shortly after AMI. KEY POINTS: • Microvascular injury after acute myocardial infarction affects local T1 and T2* values. • Infarct zone T1 values are lower if microvascular injury is present. • T2* mapping suggests that low infarct T1 values are likely haemorrhage. • T1 and T2* values are complimentary for correctly assessing post-infarct myocardium. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00330-017-5010-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-08-18 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5740192/ /pubmed/28821947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5010-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Cardiac
Robbers, Lourens F. H. J.
Nijveldt, Robin
Beek, Aernout M.
Teunissen, Paul F. A.
Hollander, Maurits R.
Biesbroek, P. Stefan
Everaars, Henk
van de Ven, Peter M.
Hofman, Mark B. M.
van Royen, Niels
van Rossum, Albert C.
The influence of microvascular injury on native T1 and T2* relaxation values after acute myocardial infarction: implications for non-contrast-enhanced infarct assessment
title The influence of microvascular injury on native T1 and T2* relaxation values after acute myocardial infarction: implications for non-contrast-enhanced infarct assessment
title_full The influence of microvascular injury on native T1 and T2* relaxation values after acute myocardial infarction: implications for non-contrast-enhanced infarct assessment
title_fullStr The influence of microvascular injury on native T1 and T2* relaxation values after acute myocardial infarction: implications for non-contrast-enhanced infarct assessment
title_full_unstemmed The influence of microvascular injury on native T1 and T2* relaxation values after acute myocardial infarction: implications for non-contrast-enhanced infarct assessment
title_short The influence of microvascular injury on native T1 and T2* relaxation values after acute myocardial infarction: implications for non-contrast-enhanced infarct assessment
title_sort influence of microvascular injury on native t1 and t2* relaxation values after acute myocardial infarction: implications for non-contrast-enhanced infarct assessment
topic Cardiac
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5740192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28821947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5010-x
work_keys_str_mv AT robberslourensfhj theinfluenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT nijveldtrobin theinfluenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT beekaernoutm theinfluenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT teunissenpaulfa theinfluenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT hollandermauritsr theinfluenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT biesbroekpstefan theinfluenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT everaarshenk theinfluenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT vandevenpeterm theinfluenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT hofmanmarkbm theinfluenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT vanroyenniels theinfluenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT vanrossumalbertc theinfluenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT robberslourensfhj influenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT nijveldtrobin influenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT beekaernoutm influenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT teunissenpaulfa influenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT hollandermauritsr influenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT biesbroekpstefan influenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT everaarshenk influenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT vandevenpeterm influenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT hofmanmarkbm influenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT vanroyenniels influenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment
AT vanrossumalbertc influenceofmicrovascularinjuryonnativet1andt2relaxationvaluesafteracutemyocardialinfarctionimplicationsfornoncontrastenhancedinfarctassessment