Cargando…
Methods used in adaptation of health–related guidelines: A systematic survey
BACKGROUND: Adaptation refers to the systematic approach for considering the endorsement or modification of recommendations produced in one setting for application in another as an alternative to de novo development. OBJECTIVE: To describe and assess the methods used for adapting health–related guid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Edinburgh University Global Health Society
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5740392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29302318 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.07.020412 |
_version_ | 1783288018075910144 |
---|---|
author | Abdul–Khalek, Rima A Darzi, Andrea J Godah, Mohammad W Kilzar, Lama Lakis, Chantal Agarwal, Arnav Abou–Jaoude, Elias Meerpohl, Joerg J Wiercioch, Wojtek Santesso, Nancy Brax, Hneine Schünemann, Holger Akl, Elie A |
author_facet | Abdul–Khalek, Rima A Darzi, Andrea J Godah, Mohammad W Kilzar, Lama Lakis, Chantal Agarwal, Arnav Abou–Jaoude, Elias Meerpohl, Joerg J Wiercioch, Wojtek Santesso, Nancy Brax, Hneine Schünemann, Holger Akl, Elie A |
author_sort | Abdul–Khalek, Rima A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adaptation refers to the systematic approach for considering the endorsement or modification of recommendations produced in one setting for application in another as an alternative to de novo development. OBJECTIVE: To describe and assess the methods used for adapting health–related guidelines published in peer–reviewed journals, and to assess the quality of the resulting adapted guidelines. METHODS: We searched Medline and Embase up to June 2015. We assessed the method of adaptation, and the quality of included guidelines. RESULTS: Seventy–two papers were eligible. Most adapted guidelines and their source guidelines were published by professional societies (71% and 68% respectively), and in high–income countries (83% and 85% respectively). Of the 57 adapted guidelines that reported any detail about adaptation method, 34 (60%) did not use a published adaptation method. The number (and percentage) of adapted guidelines fulfilling each of the ADAPTE steps ranged between 2 (4%) and 57 (100%). The quality of adapted guidelines was highest for the “scope and purpose” domain and lowest for the “editorial independence” domain (respective mean percentages of the maximum possible scores were 93% and 43%). The mean score for “rigor of development” was 57%. CONCLUSION: Most adapted guidelines published in peer–reviewed journals do not report using a published adaptation method, and their adaptation quality was variable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5740392 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Edinburgh University Global Health Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57403922018-01-04 Methods used in adaptation of health–related guidelines: A systematic survey Abdul–Khalek, Rima A Darzi, Andrea J Godah, Mohammad W Kilzar, Lama Lakis, Chantal Agarwal, Arnav Abou–Jaoude, Elias Meerpohl, Joerg J Wiercioch, Wojtek Santesso, Nancy Brax, Hneine Schünemann, Holger Akl, Elie A J Glob Health Articles BACKGROUND: Adaptation refers to the systematic approach for considering the endorsement or modification of recommendations produced in one setting for application in another as an alternative to de novo development. OBJECTIVE: To describe and assess the methods used for adapting health–related guidelines published in peer–reviewed journals, and to assess the quality of the resulting adapted guidelines. METHODS: We searched Medline and Embase up to June 2015. We assessed the method of adaptation, and the quality of included guidelines. RESULTS: Seventy–two papers were eligible. Most adapted guidelines and their source guidelines were published by professional societies (71% and 68% respectively), and in high–income countries (83% and 85% respectively). Of the 57 adapted guidelines that reported any detail about adaptation method, 34 (60%) did not use a published adaptation method. The number (and percentage) of adapted guidelines fulfilling each of the ADAPTE steps ranged between 2 (4%) and 57 (100%). The quality of adapted guidelines was highest for the “scope and purpose” domain and lowest for the “editorial independence” domain (respective mean percentages of the maximum possible scores were 93% and 43%). The mean score for “rigor of development” was 57%. CONCLUSION: Most adapted guidelines published in peer–reviewed journals do not report using a published adaptation method, and their adaptation quality was variable. Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2017-12 2017-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5740392/ /pubmed/29302318 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.07.020412 Text en Copyright © 2017 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Articles Abdul–Khalek, Rima A Darzi, Andrea J Godah, Mohammad W Kilzar, Lama Lakis, Chantal Agarwal, Arnav Abou–Jaoude, Elias Meerpohl, Joerg J Wiercioch, Wojtek Santesso, Nancy Brax, Hneine Schünemann, Holger Akl, Elie A Methods used in adaptation of health–related guidelines: A systematic survey |
title | Methods used in adaptation of health–related guidelines: A systematic survey |
title_full | Methods used in adaptation of health–related guidelines: A systematic survey |
title_fullStr | Methods used in adaptation of health–related guidelines: A systematic survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods used in adaptation of health–related guidelines: A systematic survey |
title_short | Methods used in adaptation of health–related guidelines: A systematic survey |
title_sort | methods used in adaptation of health–related guidelines: a systematic survey |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5740392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29302318 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.07.020412 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdulkhalekrimaa methodsusedinadaptationofhealthrelatedguidelinesasystematicsurvey AT darziandreaj methodsusedinadaptationofhealthrelatedguidelinesasystematicsurvey AT godahmohammadw methodsusedinadaptationofhealthrelatedguidelinesasystematicsurvey AT kilzarlama methodsusedinadaptationofhealthrelatedguidelinesasystematicsurvey AT lakischantal methodsusedinadaptationofhealthrelatedguidelinesasystematicsurvey AT agarwalarnav methodsusedinadaptationofhealthrelatedguidelinesasystematicsurvey AT aboujaoudeelias methodsusedinadaptationofhealthrelatedguidelinesasystematicsurvey AT meerpohljoergj methodsusedinadaptationofhealthrelatedguidelinesasystematicsurvey AT wierciochwojtek methodsusedinadaptationofhealthrelatedguidelinesasystematicsurvey AT santessonancy methodsusedinadaptationofhealthrelatedguidelinesasystematicsurvey AT braxhneine methodsusedinadaptationofhealthrelatedguidelinesasystematicsurvey AT schunemannholger methodsusedinadaptationofhealthrelatedguidelinesasystematicsurvey AT akleliea methodsusedinadaptationofhealthrelatedguidelinesasystematicsurvey |