Cargando…

Bulk magnetic domain stability controls paleointensity fidelity

Nonideal, nonsingle-domain magnetic grains are ubiquitous in rocks; however, they can have a detrimental impact on the fidelity of paleomagnetic records—in particular the determination of ancient magnetic field strength (paleointensity), a key means of understanding the evolution of the earliest geo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paterson, Greig A., Muxworthy, Adrian R., Yamamoto, Yuhji, Pan, Yongxin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5740627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29187534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714047114
_version_ 1783288063569428480
author Paterson, Greig A.
Muxworthy, Adrian R.
Yamamoto, Yuhji
Pan, Yongxin
author_facet Paterson, Greig A.
Muxworthy, Adrian R.
Yamamoto, Yuhji
Pan, Yongxin
author_sort Paterson, Greig A.
collection PubMed
description Nonideal, nonsingle-domain magnetic grains are ubiquitous in rocks; however, they can have a detrimental impact on the fidelity of paleomagnetic records—in particular the determination of ancient magnetic field strength (paleointensity), a key means of understanding the evolution of the earliest geodynamo and the formation of the solar system. As a consequence, great effort has been expended to link rock magnetic behavior to paleointensity results, but with little quantitative success. Using the most comprehensive rock magnetic and paleointensity data compilations, we quantify a stability trend in hysteresis data that characterizes the bulk domain stability (BDS) of the magnetic carriers in a paleomagnetic specimen. This trend is evident in both geological and archeological materials that are typically used to obtain paleointensity data and is therefore pervasive throughout most paleomagnetic studies. Comparing this trend to paleointensity data from both laboratory and historical experiments reveals a quantitative relationship between BDS and paleointensity behavior. Specimens that have lower BDS values display higher curvature on the paleointensity analysis plot, which leads to more inaccurate results. In-field quantification of BDS therefore reflects low-field bulk remanence stability. Rapid hysteresis measurements can be used to provide a powerful quantitative method for preselecting paleointensity specimens and postanalyzing previous studies, further improving our ability to select high-fidelity recordings of ancient magnetic fields. BDS analyses will enhance our ability to understand the evolution of the geodynamo and can help in understanding many fundamental Earth and planetary science questions that remain shrouded in controversy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5740627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57406272018-01-22 Bulk magnetic domain stability controls paleointensity fidelity Paterson, Greig A. Muxworthy, Adrian R. Yamamoto, Yuhji Pan, Yongxin Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Physical Sciences Nonideal, nonsingle-domain magnetic grains are ubiquitous in rocks; however, they can have a detrimental impact on the fidelity of paleomagnetic records—in particular the determination of ancient magnetic field strength (paleointensity), a key means of understanding the evolution of the earliest geodynamo and the formation of the solar system. As a consequence, great effort has been expended to link rock magnetic behavior to paleointensity results, but with little quantitative success. Using the most comprehensive rock magnetic and paleointensity data compilations, we quantify a stability trend in hysteresis data that characterizes the bulk domain stability (BDS) of the magnetic carriers in a paleomagnetic specimen. This trend is evident in both geological and archeological materials that are typically used to obtain paleointensity data and is therefore pervasive throughout most paleomagnetic studies. Comparing this trend to paleointensity data from both laboratory and historical experiments reveals a quantitative relationship between BDS and paleointensity behavior. Specimens that have lower BDS values display higher curvature on the paleointensity analysis plot, which leads to more inaccurate results. In-field quantification of BDS therefore reflects low-field bulk remanence stability. Rapid hysteresis measurements can be used to provide a powerful quantitative method for preselecting paleointensity specimens and postanalyzing previous studies, further improving our ability to select high-fidelity recordings of ancient magnetic fields. BDS analyses will enhance our ability to understand the evolution of the geodynamo and can help in understanding many fundamental Earth and planetary science questions that remain shrouded in controversy. National Academy of Sciences 2017-12-12 2017-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5740627/ /pubmed/29187534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714047114 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Physical Sciences
Paterson, Greig A.
Muxworthy, Adrian R.
Yamamoto, Yuhji
Pan, Yongxin
Bulk magnetic domain stability controls paleointensity fidelity
title Bulk magnetic domain stability controls paleointensity fidelity
title_full Bulk magnetic domain stability controls paleointensity fidelity
title_fullStr Bulk magnetic domain stability controls paleointensity fidelity
title_full_unstemmed Bulk magnetic domain stability controls paleointensity fidelity
title_short Bulk magnetic domain stability controls paleointensity fidelity
title_sort bulk magnetic domain stability controls paleointensity fidelity
topic Physical Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5740627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29187534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714047114
work_keys_str_mv AT patersongreiga bulkmagneticdomainstabilitycontrolspaleointensityfidelity
AT muxworthyadrianr bulkmagneticdomainstabilitycontrolspaleointensityfidelity
AT yamamotoyuhji bulkmagneticdomainstabilitycontrolspaleointensityfidelity
AT panyongxin bulkmagneticdomainstabilitycontrolspaleointensityfidelity