Cargando…
The efficacy of multiple versus single hyaluronic acid injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IA-HA) is a common therapy used to treat knee pain and suppress knee inflammation in knee osteoarthritis (OA), typically prescribed in regimens ranging from a single injection to 5 weekly injections given once weekly. We conducted a systematic review to d...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5740709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29268731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1897-2 |
_version_ | 1783288073761587200 |
---|---|
author | Concoff, Andrew Sancheti, Parag Niazi, Faizan Shaw, Peter Rosen, Jeffrey |
author_facet | Concoff, Andrew Sancheti, Parag Niazi, Faizan Shaw, Peter Rosen, Jeffrey |
author_sort | Concoff, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IA-HA) is a common therapy used to treat knee pain and suppress knee inflammation in knee osteoarthritis (OA), typically prescribed in regimens ranging from a single injection to 5 weekly injections given once weekly. We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy of IA-HA, with subgroup analyses to explore the differences in knee pain and adverse events (AEs) across different dosing regimens. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of the literature to identify studies evaluating IA-HA for the management of knee OA compared to IA-saline. Primary outcome measure was the mean knee pain score at 13 Weeks (3 months) or 26 weeks (6 months). Secondary outcome was the number of treatment-related AEs and treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs). We evaluated differences in levels of pain and AEs/SAEs between dosing regimens compared to IA-Saline. RESULTS: Thirty articles were included. Overall, IA-HA injections were associated with less knee pain compared to IA-Saline injections for all dosing regimens. 2–4 injections of IA-HA vs. IA-Saline produced the largest effect size at both 3-months and 6-months (Standard mean difference [SMD] = −0.76; −0.98 to −0.53, 95% CI, P < 0.00001, and SMD = −0.36; −0.63 to −0.09 95% CI, P = 0.008, respectively). Additionally, single injection studies yielded a non-significant treatment effect at 3 and 6 months, while ≥5 5 injections demonstrated a significant improvement in pain only at 6 months. Five or more injections of IA-HA were associated with a higher risk of treatment-related AEs compared to IA-Saline (Risk ratio [RR] = 1.67; 1.09 to 2.56 95% CI, p = 0.02), which was a result not seen within the 1 and 2–4 injection subgroups. CONCLUSION: Overall, 2–4 and ≥5 injection regimens provided pain relief over IA-Saline, while single injection did not. Intra-articular injections of HA used in a 2–4 injection treatment regimen provided the greatest benefit when compared to IA-Saline with respect to pain improvement in patients with knee OA, and was generally deemed safe with few to no treatment-related AEs reported across studies. Future research is needed to directly compare these treatment regimens. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-017-1897-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5740709 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57407092018-01-03 The efficacy of multiple versus single hyaluronic acid injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis Concoff, Andrew Sancheti, Parag Niazi, Faizan Shaw, Peter Rosen, Jeffrey BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IA-HA) is a common therapy used to treat knee pain and suppress knee inflammation in knee osteoarthritis (OA), typically prescribed in regimens ranging from a single injection to 5 weekly injections given once weekly. We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy of IA-HA, with subgroup analyses to explore the differences in knee pain and adverse events (AEs) across different dosing regimens. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of the literature to identify studies evaluating IA-HA for the management of knee OA compared to IA-saline. Primary outcome measure was the mean knee pain score at 13 Weeks (3 months) or 26 weeks (6 months). Secondary outcome was the number of treatment-related AEs and treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs). We evaluated differences in levels of pain and AEs/SAEs between dosing regimens compared to IA-Saline. RESULTS: Thirty articles were included. Overall, IA-HA injections were associated with less knee pain compared to IA-Saline injections for all dosing regimens. 2–4 injections of IA-HA vs. IA-Saline produced the largest effect size at both 3-months and 6-months (Standard mean difference [SMD] = −0.76; −0.98 to −0.53, 95% CI, P < 0.00001, and SMD = −0.36; −0.63 to −0.09 95% CI, P = 0.008, respectively). Additionally, single injection studies yielded a non-significant treatment effect at 3 and 6 months, while ≥5 5 injections demonstrated a significant improvement in pain only at 6 months. Five or more injections of IA-HA were associated with a higher risk of treatment-related AEs compared to IA-Saline (Risk ratio [RR] = 1.67; 1.09 to 2.56 95% CI, p = 0.02), which was a result not seen within the 1 and 2–4 injection subgroups. CONCLUSION: Overall, 2–4 and ≥5 injection regimens provided pain relief over IA-Saline, while single injection did not. Intra-articular injections of HA used in a 2–4 injection treatment regimen provided the greatest benefit when compared to IA-Saline with respect to pain improvement in patients with knee OA, and was generally deemed safe with few to no treatment-related AEs reported across studies. Future research is needed to directly compare these treatment regimens. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-017-1897-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5740709/ /pubmed/29268731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1897-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Concoff, Andrew Sancheti, Parag Niazi, Faizan Shaw, Peter Rosen, Jeffrey The efficacy of multiple versus single hyaluronic acid injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The efficacy of multiple versus single hyaluronic acid injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The efficacy of multiple versus single hyaluronic acid injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The efficacy of multiple versus single hyaluronic acid injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy of multiple versus single hyaluronic acid injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The efficacy of multiple versus single hyaluronic acid injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of multiple versus single hyaluronic acid injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5740709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29268731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1897-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT concoffandrew theefficacyofmultipleversussinglehyaluronicacidinjectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sanchetiparag theefficacyofmultipleversussinglehyaluronicacidinjectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT niazifaizan theefficacyofmultipleversussinglehyaluronicacidinjectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shawpeter theefficacyofmultipleversussinglehyaluronicacidinjectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rosenjeffrey theefficacyofmultipleversussinglehyaluronicacidinjectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT concoffandrew efficacyofmultipleversussinglehyaluronicacidinjectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sanchetiparag efficacyofmultipleversussinglehyaluronicacidinjectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT niazifaizan efficacyofmultipleversussinglehyaluronicacidinjectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shawpeter efficacyofmultipleversussinglehyaluronicacidinjectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rosenjeffrey efficacyofmultipleversussinglehyaluronicacidinjectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |