Cargando…
Multivariable regression analysis of list experiment data on abortion: results from a large, randomly-selected population based study in Liberia
BACKGROUND: The list experiment is a promising measurement tool for eliciting truthful responses to stigmatized or sensitive health behaviors. However, investigators may be hesitant to adopt the method due to previously untestable assumptions and the perceived inability to conduct multivariable anal...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5740939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29268794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-017-0157-x |
_version_ | 1783288112330309632 |
---|---|
author | Moseson, Heidi Gerdts, Caitlin Dehlendorf, Christine Hiatt, Robert A. Vittinghoff, Eric |
author_facet | Moseson, Heidi Gerdts, Caitlin Dehlendorf, Christine Hiatt, Robert A. Vittinghoff, Eric |
author_sort | Moseson, Heidi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The list experiment is a promising measurement tool for eliciting truthful responses to stigmatized or sensitive health behaviors. However, investigators may be hesitant to adopt the method due to previously untestable assumptions and the perceived inability to conduct multivariable analysis. With a recently developed statistical test that can detect the presence of a design effect – the absence of which is a central assumption of the list experiment method – we sought to test the validity of a list experiment conducted on self-reported abortion in Liberia. We also aim to introduce recently developed multivariable regression estimators for the analysis of list experiment data, to explore relationships between respondent characteristics and having had an abortion – an important component of understanding the experiences of women who have abortions. METHODS: To test the null hypothesis of no design effect in the Liberian list experiment data, we calculated the percentage of each respondent “type,” characterized by response to the control items, and compared these percentages across treatment and control groups with a Bonferroni-adjusted alpha criterion. We then implemented two least squares and two maximum likelihood models (four total), each representing different bias-variance trade-offs, to estimate the association between respondent characteristics and abortion. RESULTS: We find no clear evidence of a design effect in list experiment data from Liberia (p = 0.18), affirming the first key assumption of the method. Multivariable analyses suggest a negative association between education and history of abortion. The retrospective nature of measuring lifetime experience of abortion, however, complicates interpretation of results, as the timing and safety of a respondent’s abortion may have influenced her ability to pursue an education. CONCLUSION: Our work demonstrates that multivariable analyses, as well as statistical testing of a key design assumption, are possible with list experiment data, although with important limitations when considering lifetime measures. We outline how to implement this methodology with list experiment data in future research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12963-017-0157-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5740939 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57409392018-01-03 Multivariable regression analysis of list experiment data on abortion: results from a large, randomly-selected population based study in Liberia Moseson, Heidi Gerdts, Caitlin Dehlendorf, Christine Hiatt, Robert A. Vittinghoff, Eric Popul Health Metr Research BACKGROUND: The list experiment is a promising measurement tool for eliciting truthful responses to stigmatized or sensitive health behaviors. However, investigators may be hesitant to adopt the method due to previously untestable assumptions and the perceived inability to conduct multivariable analysis. With a recently developed statistical test that can detect the presence of a design effect – the absence of which is a central assumption of the list experiment method – we sought to test the validity of a list experiment conducted on self-reported abortion in Liberia. We also aim to introduce recently developed multivariable regression estimators for the analysis of list experiment data, to explore relationships between respondent characteristics and having had an abortion – an important component of understanding the experiences of women who have abortions. METHODS: To test the null hypothesis of no design effect in the Liberian list experiment data, we calculated the percentage of each respondent “type,” characterized by response to the control items, and compared these percentages across treatment and control groups with a Bonferroni-adjusted alpha criterion. We then implemented two least squares and two maximum likelihood models (four total), each representing different bias-variance trade-offs, to estimate the association between respondent characteristics and abortion. RESULTS: We find no clear evidence of a design effect in list experiment data from Liberia (p = 0.18), affirming the first key assumption of the method. Multivariable analyses suggest a negative association between education and history of abortion. The retrospective nature of measuring lifetime experience of abortion, however, complicates interpretation of results, as the timing and safety of a respondent’s abortion may have influenced her ability to pursue an education. CONCLUSION: Our work demonstrates that multivariable analyses, as well as statistical testing of a key design assumption, are possible with list experiment data, although with important limitations when considering lifetime measures. We outline how to implement this methodology with list experiment data in future research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12963-017-0157-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5740939/ /pubmed/29268794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-017-0157-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Moseson, Heidi Gerdts, Caitlin Dehlendorf, Christine Hiatt, Robert A. Vittinghoff, Eric Multivariable regression analysis of list experiment data on abortion: results from a large, randomly-selected population based study in Liberia |
title | Multivariable regression analysis of list experiment data on abortion: results from a large, randomly-selected population based study in Liberia |
title_full | Multivariable regression analysis of list experiment data on abortion: results from a large, randomly-selected population based study in Liberia |
title_fullStr | Multivariable regression analysis of list experiment data on abortion: results from a large, randomly-selected population based study in Liberia |
title_full_unstemmed | Multivariable regression analysis of list experiment data on abortion: results from a large, randomly-selected population based study in Liberia |
title_short | Multivariable regression analysis of list experiment data on abortion: results from a large, randomly-selected population based study in Liberia |
title_sort | multivariable regression analysis of list experiment data on abortion: results from a large, randomly-selected population based study in liberia |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5740939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29268794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-017-0157-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mosesonheidi multivariableregressionanalysisoflistexperimentdataonabortionresultsfromalargerandomlyselectedpopulationbasedstudyinliberia AT gerdtscaitlin multivariableregressionanalysisoflistexperimentdataonabortionresultsfromalargerandomlyselectedpopulationbasedstudyinliberia AT dehlendorfchristine multivariableregressionanalysisoflistexperimentdataonabortionresultsfromalargerandomlyselectedpopulationbasedstudyinliberia AT hiattroberta multivariableregressionanalysisoflistexperimentdataonabortionresultsfromalargerandomlyselectedpopulationbasedstudyinliberia AT vittinghofferic multivariableregressionanalysisoflistexperimentdataonabortionresultsfromalargerandomlyselectedpopulationbasedstudyinliberia |