Cargando…

The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique

A theory-driven program evaluation was conducted for a nursing leadership program, as a collaborative project between university faculty, the nurses’ union, the provincial Ministry of Health, and its chief nursing officers. A collaborative logic model process was used to engage stakeholders, and mix...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Havaei, Farinaz, MacPhee, Maura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5740996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29355180
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S87892
_version_ 1783288123372863488
author Havaei, Farinaz
MacPhee, Maura
author_facet Havaei, Farinaz
MacPhee, Maura
author_sort Havaei, Farinaz
collection PubMed
description A theory-driven program evaluation was conducted for a nursing leadership program, as a collaborative project between university faculty, the nurses’ union, the provincial Ministry of Health, and its chief nursing officers. A collaborative logic model process was used to engage stakeholders, and mixed methods approaches were used to answer evaluation questions. Despite demonstrated, successful outcomes, the leadership program was not supported with continued funding. This paper examines what happened during the evaluation process: What factors failed to sustain this program?
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5740996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57409962018-01-19 The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique Havaei, Farinaz MacPhee, Maura J Healthc Leadersh Review A theory-driven program evaluation was conducted for a nursing leadership program, as a collaborative project between university faculty, the nurses’ union, the provincial Ministry of Health, and its chief nursing officers. A collaborative logic model process was used to engage stakeholders, and mixed methods approaches were used to answer evaluation questions. Despite demonstrated, successful outcomes, the leadership program was not supported with continued funding. This paper examines what happened during the evaluation process: What factors failed to sustain this program? Dove Medical Press 2015-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5740996/ /pubmed/29355180 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S87892 Text en © 2015 Havaei and MacPhee. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Havaei, Farinaz
MacPhee, Maura
The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique
title The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique
title_full The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique
title_fullStr The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique
title_full_unstemmed The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique
title_short The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique
title_sort nursing leadership institute program evaluation: a critique
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5740996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29355180
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S87892
work_keys_str_mv AT havaeifarinaz thenursingleadershipinstituteprogramevaluationacritique
AT macpheemaura thenursingleadershipinstituteprogramevaluationacritique
AT havaeifarinaz nursingleadershipinstituteprogramevaluationacritique
AT macpheemaura nursingleadershipinstituteprogramevaluationacritique