Cargando…
The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique
A theory-driven program evaluation was conducted for a nursing leadership program, as a collaborative project between university faculty, the nurses’ union, the provincial Ministry of Health, and its chief nursing officers. A collaborative logic model process was used to engage stakeholders, and mix...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5740996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29355180 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S87892 |
_version_ | 1783288123372863488 |
---|---|
author | Havaei, Farinaz MacPhee, Maura |
author_facet | Havaei, Farinaz MacPhee, Maura |
author_sort | Havaei, Farinaz |
collection | PubMed |
description | A theory-driven program evaluation was conducted for a nursing leadership program, as a collaborative project between university faculty, the nurses’ union, the provincial Ministry of Health, and its chief nursing officers. A collaborative logic model process was used to engage stakeholders, and mixed methods approaches were used to answer evaluation questions. Despite demonstrated, successful outcomes, the leadership program was not supported with continued funding. This paper examines what happened during the evaluation process: What factors failed to sustain this program? |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5740996 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57409962018-01-19 The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique Havaei, Farinaz MacPhee, Maura J Healthc Leadersh Review A theory-driven program evaluation was conducted for a nursing leadership program, as a collaborative project between university faculty, the nurses’ union, the provincial Ministry of Health, and its chief nursing officers. A collaborative logic model process was used to engage stakeholders, and mixed methods approaches were used to answer evaluation questions. Despite demonstrated, successful outcomes, the leadership program was not supported with continued funding. This paper examines what happened during the evaluation process: What factors failed to sustain this program? Dove Medical Press 2015-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5740996/ /pubmed/29355180 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S87892 Text en © 2015 Havaei and MacPhee. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Havaei, Farinaz MacPhee, Maura The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique |
title | The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique |
title_full | The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique |
title_fullStr | The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique |
title_full_unstemmed | The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique |
title_short | The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique |
title_sort | nursing leadership institute program evaluation: a critique |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5740996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29355180 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S87892 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT havaeifarinaz thenursingleadershipinstituteprogramevaluationacritique AT macpheemaura thenursingleadershipinstituteprogramevaluationacritique AT havaeifarinaz nursingleadershipinstituteprogramevaluationacritique AT macpheemaura nursingleadershipinstituteprogramevaluationacritique |