Cargando…

Patient views on an electronic dispensing device for prepackaged polypharmacy: a qualitative assessment in an ambulatory setting

OBJECTIVE: To collect opinions on medication management aids (MMAs) in general and on an electronic MMA (e-MMA) dispensing prepackaged polypharmacy in sealed pouches. STUDY SETTING: The setting involved community-dwelling older adults in Basel, Switzerland, in 2013. STUDY DESIGN: The study involved...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allemann, Samuel S, Hersberger, Kurt E, Arnet, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354531
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IPRP.S90923
_version_ 1783288129539538944
author Allemann, Samuel S
Hersberger, Kurt E
Arnet, Isabelle
author_facet Allemann, Samuel S
Hersberger, Kurt E
Arnet, Isabelle
author_sort Allemann, Samuel S
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To collect opinions on medication management aids (MMAs) in general and on an electronic MMA (e-MMA) dispensing prepackaged polypharmacy in sealed pouches. STUDY SETTING: The setting involved community-dwelling older adults in Basel, Switzerland, in 2013. STUDY DESIGN: The study involved 1) a 14-day trial with the e-MMA and 2) a focus group to identify general attributes of MMAs, their applicability to the e-MMA, and possible target groups for the e-MMA. DATA COLLECTION METHODS: Six participants using long-term polypharmacy and willing to try new technologies completed the 14-day trial and participated in the focus group. Inductive content analysis was performed to extract data. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Participants rated ten of 17 general attributes as clearly applicable to the e-MMA and five as unsuitable. Attributes pertained to three interrelating themes: product design, patient support, and living conditions. Envisaged target groups were patients with time-sensitive medication regimens, patients with dementia, the visually impaired, and several patients living together to prevent accidental intake of the wrong medication. CONCLUSION: The evaluated e-MMA for prepackaged polypharmacy met the majority of the requirements set for an MMA. Patients’ living conditions, such as mobility, remain the key determinants for acceptance of an e-MMA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5741022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57410222018-01-19 Patient views on an electronic dispensing device for prepackaged polypharmacy: a qualitative assessment in an ambulatory setting Allemann, Samuel S Hersberger, Kurt E Arnet, Isabelle Integr Pharm Res Pract Original Research OBJECTIVE: To collect opinions on medication management aids (MMAs) in general and on an electronic MMA (e-MMA) dispensing prepackaged polypharmacy in sealed pouches. STUDY SETTING: The setting involved community-dwelling older adults in Basel, Switzerland, in 2013. STUDY DESIGN: The study involved 1) a 14-day trial with the e-MMA and 2) a focus group to identify general attributes of MMAs, their applicability to the e-MMA, and possible target groups for the e-MMA. DATA COLLECTION METHODS: Six participants using long-term polypharmacy and willing to try new technologies completed the 14-day trial and participated in the focus group. Inductive content analysis was performed to extract data. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Participants rated ten of 17 general attributes as clearly applicable to the e-MMA and five as unsuitable. Attributes pertained to three interrelating themes: product design, patient support, and living conditions. Envisaged target groups were patients with time-sensitive medication regimens, patients with dementia, the visually impaired, and several patients living together to prevent accidental intake of the wrong medication. CONCLUSION: The evaluated e-MMA for prepackaged polypharmacy met the majority of the requirements set for an MMA. Patients’ living conditions, such as mobility, remain the key determinants for acceptance of an e-MMA. Dove Medical Press 2015-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5741022/ /pubmed/29354531 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IPRP.S90923 Text en © 2015 Allemann et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Allemann, Samuel S
Hersberger, Kurt E
Arnet, Isabelle
Patient views on an electronic dispensing device for prepackaged polypharmacy: a qualitative assessment in an ambulatory setting
title Patient views on an electronic dispensing device for prepackaged polypharmacy: a qualitative assessment in an ambulatory setting
title_full Patient views on an electronic dispensing device for prepackaged polypharmacy: a qualitative assessment in an ambulatory setting
title_fullStr Patient views on an electronic dispensing device for prepackaged polypharmacy: a qualitative assessment in an ambulatory setting
title_full_unstemmed Patient views on an electronic dispensing device for prepackaged polypharmacy: a qualitative assessment in an ambulatory setting
title_short Patient views on an electronic dispensing device for prepackaged polypharmacy: a qualitative assessment in an ambulatory setting
title_sort patient views on an electronic dispensing device for prepackaged polypharmacy: a qualitative assessment in an ambulatory setting
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354531
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IPRP.S90923
work_keys_str_mv AT allemannsamuels patientviewsonanelectronicdispensingdeviceforprepackagedpolypharmacyaqualitativeassessmentinanambulatorysetting
AT hersbergerkurte patientviewsonanelectronicdispensingdeviceforprepackagedpolypharmacyaqualitativeassessmentinanambulatorysetting
AT arnetisabelle patientviewsonanelectronicdispensingdeviceforprepackagedpolypharmacyaqualitativeassessmentinanambulatorysetting