Cargando…
The Utility of Social Media in Providing Information on Zika Virus
Introduction In 2015, there was an outbreak of Zika virus in Brazil that spread throughout the Americas. The association of Zika virus with birth defects in infants born to infected pregnant women created concern for women of childbearing age. Social media is an important platform for health promoti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282437 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1792 |
_version_ | 1783288174113456128 |
---|---|
author | Chandrasekaran, Neeraja Gressick, Kimberly Singh, Vivek Kwal, Jaclyn Cap, Natalia Koru-Sengul, Tulay Curry, Christine L |
author_facet | Chandrasekaran, Neeraja Gressick, Kimberly Singh, Vivek Kwal, Jaclyn Cap, Natalia Koru-Sengul, Tulay Curry, Christine L |
author_sort | Chandrasekaran, Neeraja |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction In 2015, there was an outbreak of Zika virus in Brazil that spread throughout the Americas. The association of Zika virus with birth defects in infants born to infected pregnant women created concern for women of childbearing age. Social media is an important platform for health promotion, communication, and education on preventative methods during Zika virus outbreaks. Methods We evaluated the utility of social media on providing information regarding Zika virus. Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube were utilized for our study. A search of the term “#Zikavirus” on Twitter and Instagram, and “Zika virus” on Facebook and YouTube was performed. The first 50 search results were analyzed from each source. Only English, Spanish, or Portuguese results were included. Results were categorized into three groups: “Useful”, “Not Useful”, or “Misleading”. Results Search was conducted on December 17th, 2016, with 185 results. Forty (21.6%) were from Facebook, 50 (27%) from Twitter, 48 (25.9%) from YouTube, and 47 (25.4%) from Instagram. A total of 104 (56.22%) results were "Useful", 67 (36.2%) "Not Useful", and 14 (7.5%) were "Misleading”. There were significantly more “Useful” results compared to “Not Useful” and “Misleading” results (Fisher’s exact: p < 0.0001). Conclusion Social media is a useful resource for providing relevant information on Zika virus. Young women can utilize social media for Zika virus information. The role of social media in public health should be further investigated and established. Patient education interventions should focus on social media impact on behavior modification and education of public to recognize useful information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5741275 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57412752017-12-27 The Utility of Social Media in Providing Information on Zika Virus Chandrasekaran, Neeraja Gressick, Kimberly Singh, Vivek Kwal, Jaclyn Cap, Natalia Koru-Sengul, Tulay Curry, Christine L Cureus Epidemiology/Public Health Introduction In 2015, there was an outbreak of Zika virus in Brazil that spread throughout the Americas. The association of Zika virus with birth defects in infants born to infected pregnant women created concern for women of childbearing age. Social media is an important platform for health promotion, communication, and education on preventative methods during Zika virus outbreaks. Methods We evaluated the utility of social media on providing information regarding Zika virus. Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube were utilized for our study. A search of the term “#Zikavirus” on Twitter and Instagram, and “Zika virus” on Facebook and YouTube was performed. The first 50 search results were analyzed from each source. Only English, Spanish, or Portuguese results were included. Results were categorized into three groups: “Useful”, “Not Useful”, or “Misleading”. Results Search was conducted on December 17th, 2016, with 185 results. Forty (21.6%) were from Facebook, 50 (27%) from Twitter, 48 (25.9%) from YouTube, and 47 (25.4%) from Instagram. A total of 104 (56.22%) results were "Useful", 67 (36.2%) "Not Useful", and 14 (7.5%) were "Misleading”. There were significantly more “Useful” results compared to “Not Useful” and “Misleading” results (Fisher’s exact: p < 0.0001). Conclusion Social media is a useful resource for providing relevant information on Zika virus. Young women can utilize social media for Zika virus information. The role of social media in public health should be further investigated and established. Patient education interventions should focus on social media impact on behavior modification and education of public to recognize useful information. Cureus 2017-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5741275/ /pubmed/29282437 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1792 Text en Copyright © 2017, Chandrasekaran et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology/Public Health Chandrasekaran, Neeraja Gressick, Kimberly Singh, Vivek Kwal, Jaclyn Cap, Natalia Koru-Sengul, Tulay Curry, Christine L The Utility of Social Media in Providing Information on Zika Virus |
title | The Utility of Social Media in Providing Information on Zika Virus |
title_full | The Utility of Social Media in Providing Information on Zika Virus |
title_fullStr | The Utility of Social Media in Providing Information on Zika Virus |
title_full_unstemmed | The Utility of Social Media in Providing Information on Zika Virus |
title_short | The Utility of Social Media in Providing Information on Zika Virus |
title_sort | utility of social media in providing information on zika virus |
topic | Epidemiology/Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282437 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1792 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chandrasekaranneeraja theutilityofsocialmediainprovidinginformationonzikavirus AT gressickkimberly theutilityofsocialmediainprovidinginformationonzikavirus AT singhvivek theutilityofsocialmediainprovidinginformationonzikavirus AT kwaljaclyn theutilityofsocialmediainprovidinginformationonzikavirus AT capnatalia theutilityofsocialmediainprovidinginformationonzikavirus AT korusengultulay theutilityofsocialmediainprovidinginformationonzikavirus AT currychristinel theutilityofsocialmediainprovidinginformationonzikavirus AT chandrasekaranneeraja utilityofsocialmediainprovidinginformationonzikavirus AT gressickkimberly utilityofsocialmediainprovidinginformationonzikavirus AT singhvivek utilityofsocialmediainprovidinginformationonzikavirus AT kwaljaclyn utilityofsocialmediainprovidinginformationonzikavirus AT capnatalia utilityofsocialmediainprovidinginformationonzikavirus AT korusengultulay utilityofsocialmediainprovidinginformationonzikavirus AT currychristinel utilityofsocialmediainprovidinginformationonzikavirus |