Cargando…

Evaluation of marginal and internal gap of three-unit metal framework according to subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing of CAD/CAM systems

PURPOSE: To evaluate the fit of a three-unit metal framework of fixed dental prostheses made by subtractive and additive manufacturing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One master model of metal was fabricated. Twenty silicone impressions were made on the master die, working die of 10 poured with Type 4 stone...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Dong-Yeon, Kim, Eo-Bin, Kim, Hae-Young, Kim, Ji-Hwan, Kim, Woong-Chul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29279766
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.463
_version_ 1783288196379967488
author Kim, Dong-Yeon
Kim, Eo-Bin
Kim, Hae-Young
Kim, Ji-Hwan
Kim, Woong-Chul
author_facet Kim, Dong-Yeon
Kim, Eo-Bin
Kim, Hae-Young
Kim, Ji-Hwan
Kim, Woong-Chul
author_sort Kim, Dong-Yeon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the fit of a three-unit metal framework of fixed dental prostheses made by subtractive and additive manufacturing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One master model of metal was fabricated. Twenty silicone impressions were made on the master die, working die of 10 poured with Type 4 stone, and working die of 10 made of scannable stone. Ten three-unit wax frameworks were fabricated by wax-up from Type IV working die. Stereolithography files of 10 three-unit frameworks were obtained using a model scanner and three-dimensional design software on a scannable working die. The three-unit wax framework was fabricated using subtractive manufacturing (SM) by applying the prepared stereolithography file, and the resin framework was fabricated by additive manufacturing (AM); both used metal alloy castings for metal frameworks. Marginal and internal gap were measured using silicone replica technique and digital microscope. Measurement data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis H test and Mann-Whitney U-test (α=.05). RESULTS: The lowest and highest gaps between premolar and molar margins were in the SM group and the AM group, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the marginal gap among the 3 groups (P<.001). In the marginal area where pontic was present, the largest gap was 149.39 ± 42.30 µm in the AM group, and the lowest gap was 24.40 ± 11.92 µm in the SM group. CONCLUSION: Three-unit metal frameworks made by subtractive manufacturing are clinically applicable. However, additive manufacturing requires more research to be applied clinically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5741450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57414502017-12-26 Evaluation of marginal and internal gap of three-unit metal framework according to subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing of CAD/CAM systems Kim, Dong-Yeon Kim, Eo-Bin Kim, Hae-Young Kim, Ji-Hwan Kim, Woong-Chul J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the fit of a three-unit metal framework of fixed dental prostheses made by subtractive and additive manufacturing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One master model of metal was fabricated. Twenty silicone impressions were made on the master die, working die of 10 poured with Type 4 stone, and working die of 10 made of scannable stone. Ten three-unit wax frameworks were fabricated by wax-up from Type IV working die. Stereolithography files of 10 three-unit frameworks were obtained using a model scanner and three-dimensional design software on a scannable working die. The three-unit wax framework was fabricated using subtractive manufacturing (SM) by applying the prepared stereolithography file, and the resin framework was fabricated by additive manufacturing (AM); both used metal alloy castings for metal frameworks. Marginal and internal gap were measured using silicone replica technique and digital microscope. Measurement data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis H test and Mann-Whitney U-test (α=.05). RESULTS: The lowest and highest gaps between premolar and molar margins were in the SM group and the AM group, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the marginal gap among the 3 groups (P<.001). In the marginal area where pontic was present, the largest gap was 149.39 ± 42.30 µm in the AM group, and the lowest gap was 24.40 ± 11.92 µm in the SM group. CONCLUSION: Three-unit metal frameworks made by subtractive manufacturing are clinically applicable. However, additive manufacturing requires more research to be applied clinically. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2017-12 2017-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5741450/ /pubmed/29279766 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.463 Text en © 2017 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Dong-Yeon
Kim, Eo-Bin
Kim, Hae-Young
Kim, Ji-Hwan
Kim, Woong-Chul
Evaluation of marginal and internal gap of three-unit metal framework according to subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing of CAD/CAM systems
title Evaluation of marginal and internal gap of three-unit metal framework according to subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing of CAD/CAM systems
title_full Evaluation of marginal and internal gap of three-unit metal framework according to subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing of CAD/CAM systems
title_fullStr Evaluation of marginal and internal gap of three-unit metal framework according to subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing of CAD/CAM systems
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of marginal and internal gap of three-unit metal framework according to subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing of CAD/CAM systems
title_short Evaluation of marginal and internal gap of three-unit metal framework according to subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing of CAD/CAM systems
title_sort evaluation of marginal and internal gap of three-unit metal framework according to subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing of cad/cam systems
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29279766
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.463
work_keys_str_mv AT kimdongyeon evaluationofmarginalandinternalgapofthreeunitmetalframeworkaccordingtosubtractivemanufacturingandadditivemanufacturingofcadcamsystems
AT kimeobin evaluationofmarginalandinternalgapofthreeunitmetalframeworkaccordingtosubtractivemanufacturingandadditivemanufacturingofcadcamsystems
AT kimhaeyoung evaluationofmarginalandinternalgapofthreeunitmetalframeworkaccordingtosubtractivemanufacturingandadditivemanufacturingofcadcamsystems
AT kimjihwan evaluationofmarginalandinternalgapofthreeunitmetalframeworkaccordingtosubtractivemanufacturingandadditivemanufacturingofcadcamsystems
AT kimwoongchul evaluationofmarginalandinternalgapofthreeunitmetalframeworkaccordingtosubtractivemanufacturingandadditivemanufacturingofcadcamsystems