Cargando…

Breast Volume Measurement by Recycling the Data Obtained From 2 Routine Modalities, Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Objective: Preoperative prediction of breast volume is important in the planning of breast reconstructive surgery. In this study, we prospectively estimated the accuracy of measurement of breast volume using data from 2 routine modalities, mammography and magnetic resonance imaging, by comparison wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Itsukage, Shizu, Sowa, Yoshihiro, Goto, Mariko, Taguchi, Tetsuya, Numajiri, Toshiaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Open Science Company, LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29308107
_version_ 1783288201538961408
author Itsukage, Shizu
Sowa, Yoshihiro
Goto, Mariko
Taguchi, Tetsuya
Numajiri, Toshiaki
author_facet Itsukage, Shizu
Sowa, Yoshihiro
Goto, Mariko
Taguchi, Tetsuya
Numajiri, Toshiaki
author_sort Itsukage, Shizu
collection PubMed
description Objective: Preoperative prediction of breast volume is important in the planning of breast reconstructive surgery. In this study, we prospectively estimated the accuracy of measurement of breast volume using data from 2 routine modalities, mammography and magnetic resonance imaging, by comparison with volumes of mastectomy specimens. Methods: The subjects were 22 patients (24 breasts) who were scheduled to undergo total mastectomy for breast cancer. Preoperatively, magnetic resonance imaging volume measurement was performed using a medical imaging system and the mammographic volume was calculated using a previously proposed formula. Volumes of mastectomy specimens were measured intraoperatively using a method based on Archimedes’ principle and Newton's third law. Results: The average breast volumes measured on magnetic resonance imaging and mammography were 318.47 ± 199.4 mL and 325.26 ± 217.36 mL, respectively. The correlation coefficients with mastectomy specimen volumes were 0.982 for magnetic resonance imaging and 0.911 for mammography. Conclusions: Breast volume measurement using magnetic resonance imaging was highly accurate but requires data analysis software. In contrast, breast volume measurement with mammography requires only a simple formula and is sufficiently accurate, although the accuracy was lower than that obtained with magnetic resonance imaging. These results indicate that mammography could be an alternative modality for breast volume measurement as a substitute for magnetic resonance imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5741562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Open Science Company, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57415622018-01-05 Breast Volume Measurement by Recycling the Data Obtained From 2 Routine Modalities, Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Itsukage, Shizu Sowa, Yoshihiro Goto, Mariko Taguchi, Tetsuya Numajiri, Toshiaki Eplasty Journal Article Objective: Preoperative prediction of breast volume is important in the planning of breast reconstructive surgery. In this study, we prospectively estimated the accuracy of measurement of breast volume using data from 2 routine modalities, mammography and magnetic resonance imaging, by comparison with volumes of mastectomy specimens. Methods: The subjects were 22 patients (24 breasts) who were scheduled to undergo total mastectomy for breast cancer. Preoperatively, magnetic resonance imaging volume measurement was performed using a medical imaging system and the mammographic volume was calculated using a previously proposed formula. Volumes of mastectomy specimens were measured intraoperatively using a method based on Archimedes’ principle and Newton's third law. Results: The average breast volumes measured on magnetic resonance imaging and mammography were 318.47 ± 199.4 mL and 325.26 ± 217.36 mL, respectively. The correlation coefficients with mastectomy specimen volumes were 0.982 for magnetic resonance imaging and 0.911 for mammography. Conclusions: Breast volume measurement using magnetic resonance imaging was highly accurate but requires data analysis software. In contrast, breast volume measurement with mammography requires only a simple formula and is sufficiently accurate, although the accuracy was lower than that obtained with magnetic resonance imaging. These results indicate that mammography could be an alternative modality for breast volume measurement as a substitute for magnetic resonance imaging. Open Science Company, LLC 2017-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5741562/ /pubmed/29308107 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Journal Article
Itsukage, Shizu
Sowa, Yoshihiro
Goto, Mariko
Taguchi, Tetsuya
Numajiri, Toshiaki
Breast Volume Measurement by Recycling the Data Obtained From 2 Routine Modalities, Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title Breast Volume Measurement by Recycling the Data Obtained From 2 Routine Modalities, Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full Breast Volume Measurement by Recycling the Data Obtained From 2 Routine Modalities, Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr Breast Volume Measurement by Recycling the Data Obtained From 2 Routine Modalities, Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Breast Volume Measurement by Recycling the Data Obtained From 2 Routine Modalities, Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short Breast Volume Measurement by Recycling the Data Obtained From 2 Routine Modalities, Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort breast volume measurement by recycling the data obtained from 2 routine modalities, mammography and magnetic resonance imaging
topic Journal Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29308107
work_keys_str_mv AT itsukageshizu breastvolumemeasurementbyrecyclingthedataobtainedfrom2routinemodalitiesmammographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT sowayoshihiro breastvolumemeasurementbyrecyclingthedataobtainedfrom2routinemodalitiesmammographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT gotomariko breastvolumemeasurementbyrecyclingthedataobtainedfrom2routinemodalitiesmammographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT taguchitetsuya breastvolumemeasurementbyrecyclingthedataobtainedfrom2routinemodalitiesmammographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT numajiritoshiaki breastvolumemeasurementbyrecyclingthedataobtainedfrom2routinemodalitiesmammographyandmagneticresonanceimaging