Cargando…

Spinal Cord Excitability and Sprint Performance Are Enhanced by Sensory Stimulation During Cycling

Spinal cord excitability, as assessed by modulation of Hoffmann (H-) reflexes, is reduced with fatiguing isometric contractions. Furthermore, spinal cord excitability is reduced during non-fatiguing arm and leg cycling. Presynaptic inhibition of Ia terminals is believed to contribute to this suppres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pearcey, Gregory E. P., Noble, Steven A., Munro, Bridget, Zehr, E. Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29326570
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00612
_version_ 1783288225312276480
author Pearcey, Gregory E. P.
Noble, Steven A.
Munro, Bridget
Zehr, E. Paul
author_facet Pearcey, Gregory E. P.
Noble, Steven A.
Munro, Bridget
Zehr, E. Paul
author_sort Pearcey, Gregory E. P.
collection PubMed
description Spinal cord excitability, as assessed by modulation of Hoffmann (H-) reflexes, is reduced with fatiguing isometric contractions. Furthermore, spinal cord excitability is reduced during non-fatiguing arm and leg cycling. Presynaptic inhibition of Ia terminals is believed to contribute to this suppression of spinal cord excitability. Electrical stimulation to cutaneous nerves reduces Ia presynaptic inhibition, which facilitates spinal cord excitability, and this facilitation is present during arm cycling. Although it has been suggested that reducing presynaptic inhibition may prolong fatiguing contractions, it is unknown whether sensory stimulation can alter the effects of fatiguing exercise on performance or spinal cord excitability. Thus, the aim of this experiment was to determine if sensory stimulation can interfere with fatigue-related suppression of spinal cord excitability, and alter fatigue rates during cycling sprints. Thirteen participants randomly performed three experimental sessions that included: unloaded cycling with sensory stimulation (CONTROL + STIM), sprints with sensory stimulation (SPRINT + STIM) and sprints without stimulation (SPRINT). Seven participants also performed a fourth session (CONTROL), which consisted of unloaded cycling. During SPRINT and SPRINT + STIM, participants performed seven, 10 s cycling sprints interleaved with 3 min rest. For CONTROL and CONTROL + STIM, participants performed unloaded cycling for ~30 min. During SPRINT + STIM and CONTROL + STIM, participants received patterned sensory stimulation to nerves of the right foot. H-reflexes and M-waves of the right soleus were evoked by stimulation of the tibial nerve at multiple time points throughout exercise. Sensory stimulation facilitated soleus H-reflexes during unloaded cycling, whereas sprints suppressed soleus H-reflexes. While receiving sensory stimulation, there was less suppression of soleus H-reflexes and slowed reduction in average power output, compared to sprints without stimulation. These results demonstrate that sensory stimulation can substantially mitigate the fatiguing effects of sprints.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5741677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57416772018-01-11 Spinal Cord Excitability and Sprint Performance Are Enhanced by Sensory Stimulation During Cycling Pearcey, Gregory E. P. Noble, Steven A. Munro, Bridget Zehr, E. Paul Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Spinal cord excitability, as assessed by modulation of Hoffmann (H-) reflexes, is reduced with fatiguing isometric contractions. Furthermore, spinal cord excitability is reduced during non-fatiguing arm and leg cycling. Presynaptic inhibition of Ia terminals is believed to contribute to this suppression of spinal cord excitability. Electrical stimulation to cutaneous nerves reduces Ia presynaptic inhibition, which facilitates spinal cord excitability, and this facilitation is present during arm cycling. Although it has been suggested that reducing presynaptic inhibition may prolong fatiguing contractions, it is unknown whether sensory stimulation can alter the effects of fatiguing exercise on performance or spinal cord excitability. Thus, the aim of this experiment was to determine if sensory stimulation can interfere with fatigue-related suppression of spinal cord excitability, and alter fatigue rates during cycling sprints. Thirteen participants randomly performed three experimental sessions that included: unloaded cycling with sensory stimulation (CONTROL + STIM), sprints with sensory stimulation (SPRINT + STIM) and sprints without stimulation (SPRINT). Seven participants also performed a fourth session (CONTROL), which consisted of unloaded cycling. During SPRINT and SPRINT + STIM, participants performed seven, 10 s cycling sprints interleaved with 3 min rest. For CONTROL and CONTROL + STIM, participants performed unloaded cycling for ~30 min. During SPRINT + STIM and CONTROL + STIM, participants received patterned sensory stimulation to nerves of the right foot. H-reflexes and M-waves of the right soleus were evoked by stimulation of the tibial nerve at multiple time points throughout exercise. Sensory stimulation facilitated soleus H-reflexes during unloaded cycling, whereas sprints suppressed soleus H-reflexes. While receiving sensory stimulation, there was less suppression of soleus H-reflexes and slowed reduction in average power output, compared to sprints without stimulation. These results demonstrate that sensory stimulation can substantially mitigate the fatiguing effects of sprints. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5741677/ /pubmed/29326570 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00612 Text en Copyright © 2017 Pearcey, Noble, Munro and Zehr. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Pearcey, Gregory E. P.
Noble, Steven A.
Munro, Bridget
Zehr, E. Paul
Spinal Cord Excitability and Sprint Performance Are Enhanced by Sensory Stimulation During Cycling
title Spinal Cord Excitability and Sprint Performance Are Enhanced by Sensory Stimulation During Cycling
title_full Spinal Cord Excitability and Sprint Performance Are Enhanced by Sensory Stimulation During Cycling
title_fullStr Spinal Cord Excitability and Sprint Performance Are Enhanced by Sensory Stimulation During Cycling
title_full_unstemmed Spinal Cord Excitability and Sprint Performance Are Enhanced by Sensory Stimulation During Cycling
title_short Spinal Cord Excitability and Sprint Performance Are Enhanced by Sensory Stimulation During Cycling
title_sort spinal cord excitability and sprint performance are enhanced by sensory stimulation during cycling
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29326570
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00612
work_keys_str_mv AT pearceygregoryep spinalcordexcitabilityandsprintperformanceareenhancedbysensorystimulationduringcycling
AT noblestevena spinalcordexcitabilityandsprintperformanceareenhancedbysensorystimulationduringcycling
AT munrobridget spinalcordexcitabilityandsprintperformanceareenhancedbysensorystimulationduringcycling
AT zehrepaul spinalcordexcitabilityandsprintperformanceareenhancedbysensorystimulationduringcycling