Cargando…

Smear layer removal evaluation of different protocol of Bio Race file and XP- endo Finisher file in corporation with EDTA 17% and NaOCl

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the amount of the smear layer remaining in prepared root canals with different protocols of Bio RaCe files and XP-endo Finisher file (XPF) in association with 17% EDTA and sodium hypochlorite solution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 68 extrac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zand, Vahid, Mokhtari, Hadi, Reyhani, Mohammad-Frough, Nahavandizadeh, Neda, Azimi, Shahram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29302283
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54179
_version_ 1783288263473102848
author Zand, Vahid
Mokhtari, Hadi
Reyhani, Mohammad-Frough
Nahavandizadeh, Neda
Azimi, Shahram
author_facet Zand, Vahid
Mokhtari, Hadi
Reyhani, Mohammad-Frough
Nahavandizadeh, Neda
Azimi, Shahram
author_sort Zand, Vahid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the amount of the smear layer remaining in prepared root canals with different protocols of Bio RaCe files and XP-endo Finisher file (XPF) in association with 17% EDTA and sodium hypochlorite solution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 68 extracted single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into 4 experimental groups (n=14) and two control groups (n=6). The root canals were prepared with Bio RaCe files (FKG Dentaire, Switzerland) using the crown-down technique based on manufacturer’s instructions and irrigated according to the following irrigation techniques: Group 1: XPF with 2 mL of 2.5% NaOCl for 1 minute. Group 2:, XPF with 1 mL of 17% EDTA for one minute. Group 3: XPF was used for 1 minute in association with normal saline solution. Group 4: XP-endo Finisher file for 30 seconds in association with 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA for 30 seconds. The negative control group: NaOCl (2.5%) was used during root canal preparation, followed by irrigation with 17% EDTA at the end of root canal preparation. The positive control group: Normal saline solution was used for irrigation during root canal preparation. In all the groups, during preparation of the root canals with Bio RaCe file, 20 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was used for root canal irrigation and at the end of the procedural steps 20 mL of normal saline solution was used as a final irrigant. The samples were analyzed under SEM at ×1000‒2000 magnification and evaluated using Torabinejad scoring system. Data were analyzed with non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc Mann-Whitney U test, using SPSS. Statistical significant was defined at P<0.05. RESULTS: The results of the study showed the least amount of the smear layer at coronal, middle and apical thirds of the root canals in groups 2, which was not significantly different from the negative control group (P<0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Under the limitations of the present study, use of a combination of NaOCl and EDTA in association with XPF exhibited the best efficacy for the removal of the smear layer. Key words:Smear layer, XP-endo Finisher file, EDTA, Sodium hypochlorite.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5741844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57418442018-01-04 Smear layer removal evaluation of different protocol of Bio Race file and XP- endo Finisher file in corporation with EDTA 17% and NaOCl Zand, Vahid Mokhtari, Hadi Reyhani, Mohammad-Frough Nahavandizadeh, Neda Azimi, Shahram J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the amount of the smear layer remaining in prepared root canals with different protocols of Bio RaCe files and XP-endo Finisher file (XPF) in association with 17% EDTA and sodium hypochlorite solution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 68 extracted single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into 4 experimental groups (n=14) and two control groups (n=6). The root canals were prepared with Bio RaCe files (FKG Dentaire, Switzerland) using the crown-down technique based on manufacturer’s instructions and irrigated according to the following irrigation techniques: Group 1: XPF with 2 mL of 2.5% NaOCl for 1 minute. Group 2:, XPF with 1 mL of 17% EDTA for one minute. Group 3: XPF was used for 1 minute in association with normal saline solution. Group 4: XP-endo Finisher file for 30 seconds in association with 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA for 30 seconds. The negative control group: NaOCl (2.5%) was used during root canal preparation, followed by irrigation with 17% EDTA at the end of root canal preparation. The positive control group: Normal saline solution was used for irrigation during root canal preparation. In all the groups, during preparation of the root canals with Bio RaCe file, 20 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was used for root canal irrigation and at the end of the procedural steps 20 mL of normal saline solution was used as a final irrigant. The samples were analyzed under SEM at ×1000‒2000 magnification and evaluated using Torabinejad scoring system. Data were analyzed with non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc Mann-Whitney U test, using SPSS. Statistical significant was defined at P<0.05. RESULTS: The results of the study showed the least amount of the smear layer at coronal, middle and apical thirds of the root canals in groups 2, which was not significantly different from the negative control group (P<0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Under the limitations of the present study, use of a combination of NaOCl and EDTA in association with XPF exhibited the best efficacy for the removal of the smear layer. Key words:Smear layer, XP-endo Finisher file, EDTA, Sodium hypochlorite. Medicina Oral S.L. 2017-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5741844/ /pubmed/29302283 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54179 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Zand, Vahid
Mokhtari, Hadi
Reyhani, Mohammad-Frough
Nahavandizadeh, Neda
Azimi, Shahram
Smear layer removal evaluation of different protocol of Bio Race file and XP- endo Finisher file in corporation with EDTA 17% and NaOCl
title Smear layer removal evaluation of different protocol of Bio Race file and XP- endo Finisher file in corporation with EDTA 17% and NaOCl
title_full Smear layer removal evaluation of different protocol of Bio Race file and XP- endo Finisher file in corporation with EDTA 17% and NaOCl
title_fullStr Smear layer removal evaluation of different protocol of Bio Race file and XP- endo Finisher file in corporation with EDTA 17% and NaOCl
title_full_unstemmed Smear layer removal evaluation of different protocol of Bio Race file and XP- endo Finisher file in corporation with EDTA 17% and NaOCl
title_short Smear layer removal evaluation of different protocol of Bio Race file and XP- endo Finisher file in corporation with EDTA 17% and NaOCl
title_sort smear layer removal evaluation of different protocol of bio race file and xp- endo finisher file in corporation with edta 17% and naocl
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29302283
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54179
work_keys_str_mv AT zandvahid smearlayerremovalevaluationofdifferentprotocolofbioracefileandxpendofinisherfileincorporationwithedta17andnaocl
AT mokhtarihadi smearlayerremovalevaluationofdifferentprotocolofbioracefileandxpendofinisherfileincorporationwithedta17andnaocl
AT reyhanimohammadfrough smearlayerremovalevaluationofdifferentprotocolofbioracefileandxpendofinisherfileincorporationwithedta17andnaocl
AT nahavandizadehneda smearlayerremovalevaluationofdifferentprotocolofbioracefileandxpendofinisherfileincorporationwithedta17andnaocl
AT azimishahram smearlayerremovalevaluationofdifferentprotocolofbioracefileandxpendofinisherfileincorporationwithedta17andnaocl