Cargando…

Integrative health care – What are the relevant health outcomes from a practice perspective? A survey

BACKGROUND: Integrative health care (IHC) is an innovative approach to health care delivery. There is increasing focus on and demand for the evaluation of IHC practices. To ensure such evaluations capture their full scope, a clear understanding of the types of outcomes relevant to an IHC approach is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kania-Richmond, Ania, Metcalfe, Amy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29273041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-2041-4
_version_ 1783288291647291392
author Kania-Richmond, Ania
Metcalfe, Amy
author_facet Kania-Richmond, Ania
Metcalfe, Amy
author_sort Kania-Richmond, Ania
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Integrative health care (IHC) is an innovative approach to health care delivery. There is increasing focus on and demand for the evaluation of IHC practices. To ensure such evaluations capture their full scope, a clear understanding of the types of outcomes relevant to an IHC approach is needed. The objective was to describe the health domains and health outcomes relevant to IHC practices in Canada. METHODS: An online survey of Canadian IHC clinics. Survey questions were informed by the IN-CAM Health Outcomes Database. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Chi square tests were used to compare responses between clinic types and patient groups served. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 21 clinics (response rate: 50%). Physical, psychological, social, individualized and holistic were identified as applicable health domains by more than 90% of the clinics. Spiritual domain was the least relevant (70% of clinics). A number of relevant outcomes within each domain were identified. A core set of outcomes were identified and included: fatigue, anxiety, stress, and patient-provider relationship, and quality of life. Clinics with primarily conventional health practitioners were less likely to address overall well-being (p = 0.04), while clinics that provided care to a specialized patient population (i.e. cancer patients) or a mix of general and specialized patients were less likely to address religious practices (p = 0.04) or spiritual experiences (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes across health domains should be considered in the evaluation of IHC models to generate an understanding of the full scope of effectiveness of IHC approaches. The core set of outcomes identified may facilitate this task. Ethics approval (Ethics ID REB14-0495) was received from the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12906-017-2041-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5741963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57419632018-01-03 Integrative health care – What are the relevant health outcomes from a practice perspective? A survey Kania-Richmond, Ania Metcalfe, Amy BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Integrative health care (IHC) is an innovative approach to health care delivery. There is increasing focus on and demand for the evaluation of IHC practices. To ensure such evaluations capture their full scope, a clear understanding of the types of outcomes relevant to an IHC approach is needed. The objective was to describe the health domains and health outcomes relevant to IHC practices in Canada. METHODS: An online survey of Canadian IHC clinics. Survey questions were informed by the IN-CAM Health Outcomes Database. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Chi square tests were used to compare responses between clinic types and patient groups served. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 21 clinics (response rate: 50%). Physical, psychological, social, individualized and holistic were identified as applicable health domains by more than 90% of the clinics. Spiritual domain was the least relevant (70% of clinics). A number of relevant outcomes within each domain were identified. A core set of outcomes were identified and included: fatigue, anxiety, stress, and patient-provider relationship, and quality of life. Clinics with primarily conventional health practitioners were less likely to address overall well-being (p = 0.04), while clinics that provided care to a specialized patient population (i.e. cancer patients) or a mix of general and specialized patients were less likely to address religious practices (p = 0.04) or spiritual experiences (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes across health domains should be considered in the evaluation of IHC models to generate an understanding of the full scope of effectiveness of IHC approaches. The core set of outcomes identified may facilitate this task. Ethics approval (Ethics ID REB14-0495) was received from the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12906-017-2041-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5741963/ /pubmed/29273041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-2041-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kania-Richmond, Ania
Metcalfe, Amy
Integrative health care – What are the relevant health outcomes from a practice perspective? A survey
title Integrative health care – What are the relevant health outcomes from a practice perspective? A survey
title_full Integrative health care – What are the relevant health outcomes from a practice perspective? A survey
title_fullStr Integrative health care – What are the relevant health outcomes from a practice perspective? A survey
title_full_unstemmed Integrative health care – What are the relevant health outcomes from a practice perspective? A survey
title_short Integrative health care – What are the relevant health outcomes from a practice perspective? A survey
title_sort integrative health care – what are the relevant health outcomes from a practice perspective? a survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29273041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-2041-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kaniarichmondania integrativehealthcarewhataretherelevanthealthoutcomesfromapracticeperspectiveasurvey
AT metcalfeamy integrativehealthcarewhataretherelevanthealthoutcomesfromapracticeperspectiveasurvey