Cargando…

Responses to provision of personalised cancer risk information: a qualitative interview study with members of the public

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that nearly 600,000 cancer cases in the UK could have been avoided in the past five years if people had healthier lifestyles. A number of theories of behaviour change suggest that before people will change health behaviours, they must accept that a risk applies to them. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Usher-Smith, Juliet A., Silarova, Barbora, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Duschinsky, Robbie, Campbell, Jackie, Warcaba, Joanne, Muir, Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29273050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4985-1
_version_ 1783288291868540928
author Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
Silarova, Barbora
Lophatananon, Artitaya
Duschinsky, Robbie
Campbell, Jackie
Warcaba, Joanne
Muir, Kenneth
author_facet Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
Silarova, Barbora
Lophatananon, Artitaya
Duschinsky, Robbie
Campbell, Jackie
Warcaba, Joanne
Muir, Kenneth
author_sort Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is estimated that nearly 600,000 cancer cases in the UK could have been avoided in the past five years if people had healthier lifestyles. A number of theories of behaviour change suggest that before people will change health behaviours, they must accept that a risk applies to them. This study aimed to explore the views of the public on receiving personalised cancer risk information and the potential for that information to motivate behaviour change. METHODS: We conducted 27 interviews with members of the public (mean age 49 ± 23 years). Each participant completed a questionnaire to allow calculation of their risk of developing the most common cancers (10 for women, 8 for men). During the interviews we presented their risk using a web-based tool developed for the study and discussions covered their views on receiving that information. Each interview was audio-recorded and then analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants generally viewed the concept of personalised cancer risk positively. The first reaction of almost all when presented with their 10-year risk of an individual cancer without any further context was that it was low and not concerning. Views on what constituted a high risk ranged widely, from 0.5 to 60%. All felt seeing the impact of changes in lifestyle was helpful. For some this led to intentions to change behaviour, but reductions in risk were not always motivating as the risks were considered low and differences small. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of personalised cancer risk was well received and may be a useful addition to other cancer prevention initiatives. Further work is needed in particular to develop ways to present cancer risk that reflect the general perception of what constitutes a risk high enough to motivate behaviour change and help patients contextualise a less well known health risk by providing a frame of reference. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-017-4985-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5741964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57419642018-01-03 Responses to provision of personalised cancer risk information: a qualitative interview study with members of the public Usher-Smith, Juliet A. Silarova, Barbora Lophatananon, Artitaya Duschinsky, Robbie Campbell, Jackie Warcaba, Joanne Muir, Kenneth BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: It is estimated that nearly 600,000 cancer cases in the UK could have been avoided in the past five years if people had healthier lifestyles. A number of theories of behaviour change suggest that before people will change health behaviours, they must accept that a risk applies to them. This study aimed to explore the views of the public on receiving personalised cancer risk information and the potential for that information to motivate behaviour change. METHODS: We conducted 27 interviews with members of the public (mean age 49 ± 23 years). Each participant completed a questionnaire to allow calculation of their risk of developing the most common cancers (10 for women, 8 for men). During the interviews we presented their risk using a web-based tool developed for the study and discussions covered their views on receiving that information. Each interview was audio-recorded and then analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants generally viewed the concept of personalised cancer risk positively. The first reaction of almost all when presented with their 10-year risk of an individual cancer without any further context was that it was low and not concerning. Views on what constituted a high risk ranged widely, from 0.5 to 60%. All felt seeing the impact of changes in lifestyle was helpful. For some this led to intentions to change behaviour, but reductions in risk were not always motivating as the risks were considered low and differences small. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of personalised cancer risk was well received and may be a useful addition to other cancer prevention initiatives. Further work is needed in particular to develop ways to present cancer risk that reflect the general perception of what constitutes a risk high enough to motivate behaviour change and help patients contextualise a less well known health risk by providing a frame of reference. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-017-4985-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5741964/ /pubmed/29273050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4985-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
Silarova, Barbora
Lophatananon, Artitaya
Duschinsky, Robbie
Campbell, Jackie
Warcaba, Joanne
Muir, Kenneth
Responses to provision of personalised cancer risk information: a qualitative interview study with members of the public
title Responses to provision of personalised cancer risk information: a qualitative interview study with members of the public
title_full Responses to provision of personalised cancer risk information: a qualitative interview study with members of the public
title_fullStr Responses to provision of personalised cancer risk information: a qualitative interview study with members of the public
title_full_unstemmed Responses to provision of personalised cancer risk information: a qualitative interview study with members of the public
title_short Responses to provision of personalised cancer risk information: a qualitative interview study with members of the public
title_sort responses to provision of personalised cancer risk information: a qualitative interview study with members of the public
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29273050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4985-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ushersmithjulieta responsestoprovisionofpersonalisedcancerriskinformationaqualitativeinterviewstudywithmembersofthepublic
AT silarovabarbora responsestoprovisionofpersonalisedcancerriskinformationaqualitativeinterviewstudywithmembersofthepublic
AT lophatananonartitaya responsestoprovisionofpersonalisedcancerriskinformationaqualitativeinterviewstudywithmembersofthepublic
AT duschinskyrobbie responsestoprovisionofpersonalisedcancerriskinformationaqualitativeinterviewstudywithmembersofthepublic
AT campbelljackie responsestoprovisionofpersonalisedcancerriskinformationaqualitativeinterviewstudywithmembersofthepublic
AT warcabajoanne responsestoprovisionofpersonalisedcancerriskinformationaqualitativeinterviewstudywithmembersofthepublic
AT muirkenneth responsestoprovisionofpersonalisedcancerriskinformationaqualitativeinterviewstudywithmembersofthepublic