Cargando…

Baseline knowledge of potential pet toxins: a survey of pharmacists

BACKGROUND: Consumer expenditures on their family pets are rapidly increasing, part of which can be attributed to prescription and OTC medications. In turn, community pharmacies are seeking and receiving an increased number of prescriptions for animals. Community pharmacists’ ability to safely care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Young, Natalie W., Royal, Kenneth D., Davidson, Gigi S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29317921
http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2017.04.1058
_version_ 1783288299101618176
author Young, Natalie W.
Royal, Kenneth D.
Davidson, Gigi S.
author_facet Young, Natalie W.
Royal, Kenneth D.
Davidson, Gigi S.
author_sort Young, Natalie W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Consumer expenditures on their family pets are rapidly increasing, part of which can be attributed to prescription and OTC medications. In turn, community pharmacies are seeking and receiving an increased number of prescriptions for animals. Community pharmacists’ ability to safely care for animal patients is relatively unexplored. Human medications, their normal dosing and even medication excipients could be lethal in some animal patients. OBJECTIVE: The overarching objective of this study was to assess pharmacists’ baseline knowledge of potential pet poisons. METHODS: The sample consisted of licensed pharmacists registered with the North Carolina Board of Pharmacy. The Pet Toxins Survey (PTS), a survey consisting of 25 potential pet toxins, was administered during October and November 2015. Analyses consisted of calculating descriptive statics (including graphical summaries to test for normality), and inferential statistics (two-tailed t-tests and ANOVAs) to compare responses across demographic variables. RESULTS: A 6.3% response rate was obtained. After selecting either a dog or a cat to establish a frame of reference, participants in this study were able to correctly identify 15 of the 25 listed items as toxic to a pet (60% accuracy). Participants did not express adequate concern for the ingestion of several potential toxins. This includes potential excipients found in medication formulations such as xylitol, tea tree oil and caffeine. Female participants and those age 50 years and older were more likely to indicate concern for each potential toxin. There was no significant difference observed in responses based on the pharmacists’ work setting. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this investigation suggest that pharmacists are deficient in their understanding of veterinary toxicology. Given the rise of community pharmacists caring for animal patients, it’s paramount that pharmacists be able to confidently distinguish potential pet toxins from non-toxins. It is also important that pharmacists receive a better understanding of what exposures require immediate action and what action should be taken.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5741998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57419982018-01-09 Baseline knowledge of potential pet toxins: a survey of pharmacists Young, Natalie W. Royal, Kenneth D. Davidson, Gigi S. Pharm Pract (Granada) Original Research BACKGROUND: Consumer expenditures on their family pets are rapidly increasing, part of which can be attributed to prescription and OTC medications. In turn, community pharmacies are seeking and receiving an increased number of prescriptions for animals. Community pharmacists’ ability to safely care for animal patients is relatively unexplored. Human medications, their normal dosing and even medication excipients could be lethal in some animal patients. OBJECTIVE: The overarching objective of this study was to assess pharmacists’ baseline knowledge of potential pet poisons. METHODS: The sample consisted of licensed pharmacists registered with the North Carolina Board of Pharmacy. The Pet Toxins Survey (PTS), a survey consisting of 25 potential pet toxins, was administered during October and November 2015. Analyses consisted of calculating descriptive statics (including graphical summaries to test for normality), and inferential statistics (two-tailed t-tests and ANOVAs) to compare responses across demographic variables. RESULTS: A 6.3% response rate was obtained. After selecting either a dog or a cat to establish a frame of reference, participants in this study were able to correctly identify 15 of the 25 listed items as toxic to a pet (60% accuracy). Participants did not express adequate concern for the ingestion of several potential toxins. This includes potential excipients found in medication formulations such as xylitol, tea tree oil and caffeine. Female participants and those age 50 years and older were more likely to indicate concern for each potential toxin. There was no significant difference observed in responses based on the pharmacists’ work setting. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this investigation suggest that pharmacists are deficient in their understanding of veterinary toxicology. Given the rise of community pharmacists caring for animal patients, it’s paramount that pharmacists be able to confidently distinguish potential pet toxins from non-toxins. It is also important that pharmacists receive a better understanding of what exposures require immediate action and what action should be taken. Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2017 2017-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5741998/ /pubmed/29317921 http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2017.04.1058 Text en Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Young, Natalie W.
Royal, Kenneth D.
Davidson, Gigi S.
Baseline knowledge of potential pet toxins: a survey of pharmacists
title Baseline knowledge of potential pet toxins: a survey of pharmacists
title_full Baseline knowledge of potential pet toxins: a survey of pharmacists
title_fullStr Baseline knowledge of potential pet toxins: a survey of pharmacists
title_full_unstemmed Baseline knowledge of potential pet toxins: a survey of pharmacists
title_short Baseline knowledge of potential pet toxins: a survey of pharmacists
title_sort baseline knowledge of potential pet toxins: a survey of pharmacists
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29317921
http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2017.04.1058
work_keys_str_mv AT youngnataliew baselineknowledgeofpotentialpettoxinsasurveyofpharmacists
AT royalkennethd baselineknowledgeofpotentialpettoxinsasurveyofpharmacists
AT davidsongigis baselineknowledgeofpotentialpettoxinsasurveyofpharmacists