Cargando…
Reno-portal shunt for liver transplant, an alternative inflow for recipients with grade III–IV portal vein thrombosis: Tips for a better outcome
INTRODUCTION: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) poses an extremely difficult problem in cirrhotic patients who are in need of a liver transplant. The prevalence of PVT in patients with cirrhosis ranges from 0.6% to 26% Nery et al. (2015) [1]. The presence of PVT is associated with more technically diffic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5742012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29102862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.09.028 |
_version_ | 1783288302072233984 |
---|---|
author | Nazzal, Mustafa Sun, Yifei Okoye, Obi Diggs, Laurence Evans, Neil Osborn, Tamara Etesami, Kambiz Varma, Chintalapati |
author_facet | Nazzal, Mustafa Sun, Yifei Okoye, Obi Diggs, Laurence Evans, Neil Osborn, Tamara Etesami, Kambiz Varma, Chintalapati |
author_sort | Nazzal, Mustafa |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) poses an extremely difficult problem in cirrhotic patients who are in need of a liver transplant. The prevalence of PVT in patients with cirrhosis ranges from 0.6% to 26% Nery et al. (2015) [1]. The presence of PVT is associated with more technically difficult liver transplant and in certain cases can be a contraindication to liver transplant. The only option for these patients with extensive PVT would be a multi-visceral transplant, the later unfortunately has a much higher morbidity and mortality compared to liver only transplant Smith et al. (2016) [2]. An alternative approach is needed to provide a safe and reliable outcome. PRESENTATION OF CASE: In this case series, we present our experience with reno-portal shunt as an alternative inflow for the liver allograft. DISCUSSION: This approach appears to be safe with good long-term outcome.Although this technique has been described before, we provide additional considerations that produced good outcomes in our patients. CONCLUSION: We believe that meticulous preoperative planning with high-resolution triple phase CT imaging with a measurement of the diameter of the spleno-renal shunt along with a duplex scan measuring flow through the shunt is key to a successful transplantation. Moreover, appropriate donor liver size is also of extreme importance to avoid portal hypoperfusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5742012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57420122018-01-02 Reno-portal shunt for liver transplant, an alternative inflow for recipients with grade III–IV portal vein thrombosis: Tips for a better outcome Nazzal, Mustafa Sun, Yifei Okoye, Obi Diggs, Laurence Evans, Neil Osborn, Tamara Etesami, Kambiz Varma, Chintalapati Int J Surg Case Rep Article INTRODUCTION: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) poses an extremely difficult problem in cirrhotic patients who are in need of a liver transplant. The prevalence of PVT in patients with cirrhosis ranges from 0.6% to 26% Nery et al. (2015) [1]. The presence of PVT is associated with more technically difficult liver transplant and in certain cases can be a contraindication to liver transplant. The only option for these patients with extensive PVT would be a multi-visceral transplant, the later unfortunately has a much higher morbidity and mortality compared to liver only transplant Smith et al. (2016) [2]. An alternative approach is needed to provide a safe and reliable outcome. PRESENTATION OF CASE: In this case series, we present our experience with reno-portal shunt as an alternative inflow for the liver allograft. DISCUSSION: This approach appears to be safe with good long-term outcome.Although this technique has been described before, we provide additional considerations that produced good outcomes in our patients. CONCLUSION: We believe that meticulous preoperative planning with high-resolution triple phase CT imaging with a measurement of the diameter of the spleno-renal shunt along with a duplex scan measuring flow through the shunt is key to a successful transplantation. Moreover, appropriate donor liver size is also of extreme importance to avoid portal hypoperfusion. Elsevier 2017-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5742012/ /pubmed/29102862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.09.028 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nazzal, Mustafa Sun, Yifei Okoye, Obi Diggs, Laurence Evans, Neil Osborn, Tamara Etesami, Kambiz Varma, Chintalapati Reno-portal shunt for liver transplant, an alternative inflow for recipients with grade III–IV portal vein thrombosis: Tips for a better outcome |
title | Reno-portal shunt for liver transplant, an alternative inflow for recipients with grade III–IV portal vein thrombosis: Tips for a better outcome |
title_full | Reno-portal shunt for liver transplant, an alternative inflow for recipients with grade III–IV portal vein thrombosis: Tips for a better outcome |
title_fullStr | Reno-portal shunt for liver transplant, an alternative inflow for recipients with grade III–IV portal vein thrombosis: Tips for a better outcome |
title_full_unstemmed | Reno-portal shunt for liver transplant, an alternative inflow for recipients with grade III–IV portal vein thrombosis: Tips for a better outcome |
title_short | Reno-portal shunt for liver transplant, an alternative inflow for recipients with grade III–IV portal vein thrombosis: Tips for a better outcome |
title_sort | reno-portal shunt for liver transplant, an alternative inflow for recipients with grade iii–iv portal vein thrombosis: tips for a better outcome |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5742012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29102862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.09.028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nazzalmustafa renoportalshuntforlivertransplantanalternativeinflowforrecipientswithgradeiiiivportalveinthrombosistipsforabetteroutcome AT sunyifei renoportalshuntforlivertransplantanalternativeinflowforrecipientswithgradeiiiivportalveinthrombosistipsforabetteroutcome AT okoyeobi renoportalshuntforlivertransplantanalternativeinflowforrecipientswithgradeiiiivportalveinthrombosistipsforabetteroutcome AT diggslaurence renoportalshuntforlivertransplantanalternativeinflowforrecipientswithgradeiiiivportalveinthrombosistipsforabetteroutcome AT evansneil renoportalshuntforlivertransplantanalternativeinflowforrecipientswithgradeiiiivportalveinthrombosistipsforabetteroutcome AT osborntamara renoportalshuntforlivertransplantanalternativeinflowforrecipientswithgradeiiiivportalveinthrombosistipsforabetteroutcome AT etesamikambiz renoportalshuntforlivertransplantanalternativeinflowforrecipientswithgradeiiiivportalveinthrombosistipsforabetteroutcome AT varmachintalapati renoportalshuntforlivertransplantanalternativeinflowforrecipientswithgradeiiiivportalveinthrombosistipsforabetteroutcome |