Cargando…

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Brief Adolescent Gambling Screen (BAGS)

The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate the initial reliability, validity and classification accuracy of a new brief screen for adolescent problem gambling. The three-item Brief Adolescent Gambling Screen (BAGS) was derived from the nine-item Gambling Problem Severity Subscale (GPSS) o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stinchfield, Randy, Wynne, Harold, Wiebe, Jamie, Tremblay, Joel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5742264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29312064
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02204
_version_ 1783288344109645824
author Stinchfield, Randy
Wynne, Harold
Wiebe, Jamie
Tremblay, Joel
author_facet Stinchfield, Randy
Wynne, Harold
Wiebe, Jamie
Tremblay, Joel
author_sort Stinchfield, Randy
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate the initial reliability, validity and classification accuracy of a new brief screen for adolescent problem gambling. The three-item Brief Adolescent Gambling Screen (BAGS) was derived from the nine-item Gambling Problem Severity Subscale (GPSS) of the Canadian Adolescent Gambling Inventory (CAGI) using a secondary analysis of existing CAGI data. The sample of 105 adolescents included 49 females and 56 males from Canada who completed the CAGI, a self-administered measure of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for Pathological Gambling, and a clinician-administered diagnostic interview including the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for Pathological Gambling (both of which were adapted to yield DSM-5 Gambling Disorder diagnosis). A stepwise multivariate discriminant function analysis selected three GPSS items as the best predictors of a diagnosis of Gambling Disorder. The BAGS demonstrated satisfactory estimates of reliability, validity and classification accuracy and was equivalent to the nine-item GPSS of the CAGI and the BAGS was more accurate than the SOGS-RA. The BAGS estimates of classification accuracy include hit rate = 0.95, sensitivity = 0.88, specificity = 0.98, false positive rate = 0.02, and false negative rate = 0.12. Since these classification estimates are preliminary, derived from a relatively small sample size, and based upon the same sample from which the items were selected, it will be important to cross-validate the BAGS with larger and more diverse samples. The BAGS should be evaluated for use as a screening tool in both clinical and school settings as well as epidemiological surveys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5742264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57422642018-01-08 Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Brief Adolescent Gambling Screen (BAGS) Stinchfield, Randy Wynne, Harold Wiebe, Jamie Tremblay, Joel Front Psychol Psychology The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate the initial reliability, validity and classification accuracy of a new brief screen for adolescent problem gambling. The three-item Brief Adolescent Gambling Screen (BAGS) was derived from the nine-item Gambling Problem Severity Subscale (GPSS) of the Canadian Adolescent Gambling Inventory (CAGI) using a secondary analysis of existing CAGI data. The sample of 105 adolescents included 49 females and 56 males from Canada who completed the CAGI, a self-administered measure of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for Pathological Gambling, and a clinician-administered diagnostic interview including the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for Pathological Gambling (both of which were adapted to yield DSM-5 Gambling Disorder diagnosis). A stepwise multivariate discriminant function analysis selected three GPSS items as the best predictors of a diagnosis of Gambling Disorder. The BAGS demonstrated satisfactory estimates of reliability, validity and classification accuracy and was equivalent to the nine-item GPSS of the CAGI and the BAGS was more accurate than the SOGS-RA. The BAGS estimates of classification accuracy include hit rate = 0.95, sensitivity = 0.88, specificity = 0.98, false positive rate = 0.02, and false negative rate = 0.12. Since these classification estimates are preliminary, derived from a relatively small sample size, and based upon the same sample from which the items were selected, it will be important to cross-validate the BAGS with larger and more diverse samples. The BAGS should be evaluated for use as a screening tool in both clinical and school settings as well as epidemiological surveys. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5742264/ /pubmed/29312064 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02204 Text en Copyright © 2017 Stinchfield, Wynne, Wiebe and Tremblay. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Stinchfield, Randy
Wynne, Harold
Wiebe, Jamie
Tremblay, Joel
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Brief Adolescent Gambling Screen (BAGS)
title Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Brief Adolescent Gambling Screen (BAGS)
title_full Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Brief Adolescent Gambling Screen (BAGS)
title_fullStr Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Brief Adolescent Gambling Screen (BAGS)
title_full_unstemmed Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Brief Adolescent Gambling Screen (BAGS)
title_short Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Brief Adolescent Gambling Screen (BAGS)
title_sort development and psychometric evaluation of the brief adolescent gambling screen (bags)
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5742264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29312064
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02204
work_keys_str_mv AT stinchfieldrandy developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthebriefadolescentgamblingscreenbags
AT wynneharold developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthebriefadolescentgamblingscreenbags
AT wiebejamie developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthebriefadolescentgamblingscreenbags
AT tremblayjoel developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthebriefadolescentgamblingscreenbags