Cargando…

EUS-guided Biliary Drainage for Malignant Perihilar Biliary Strictures after Further Transpapillary Intervention Has Been Judged to Be Impossible or Ineffective

OBJECTIVE: Patients with perihilar malignancy often develop recurrence of infectious cholangitis, which makes further transpapillary intervention extremely difficult. As endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) of an intrahepatic bile duct is a possible option for additional inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanno, Yoshihide, Ito, Kei, Koshita, Shinsuke, Ogawa, Takahisa, Masu, Kaori, Kusunose, Hiroaki, Sakai, Toshitaka, Masaki, Yoshiharu, Murabayashi, Toji, Hasegawa, Sho, Kozakai, Fumisato, Horaguchi, Jun, Matsuo, Hidenori, Noda, Yutaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5742384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29021470
http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.9001-17
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Patients with perihilar malignancy often develop recurrence of infectious cholangitis, which makes further transpapillary intervention extremely difficult. As endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) of an intrahepatic bile duct is a possible option for additional intervention, the aim of this study was to estimate the feasibility of such intervention. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Patients who had undergone EUS-BD after further transpapillary intervention was deemed impossible or ineffective were investigated in this study. Those who had not received previous interventions via the papilla were excluded. Procedure-related adverse events, clinical efficacy, and time to recurrence of jaundice or infectious cholangitis transthyretin (TTR) were evaluated. RESULTS: Seven patients were eligible for the study between 2007 and 2016 (7 men; mean age, 77 years; 4 with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and 3 with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma). No procedure-related adverse events were observed. EUS-BD was clinically effective and enabled hospital discharge in 4 patients (57%). The TTR in these 4 clinically effective patients was 43, 105, 118, and 147 days after the procedure (median, 112 days). CONCLUSION: EUS-BD was found to be safe and often effective in patients in whom additional transpapillary intervention had become difficult, although its efficacy was limited to a short period.