Cargando…

Physiological differences between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol in recreational runners and metabolic demand prediction

This study investigated the physiological difference in recreational runners between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol. It also aimed to determine physiological surrogate that could monitor metabolic demand of prolonged running in real‐time. For data collection, a total of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ali, Muhammad J., Govindasamay, Balasekaran, Kay Hiang, Hoon, Seet Gim Lee, Gerald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5742706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29242309
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13546
_version_ 1783288431722364928
author Ali, Muhammad J.
Govindasamay, Balasekaran
Kay Hiang, Hoon
Seet Gim Lee, Gerald
author_facet Ali, Muhammad J.
Govindasamay, Balasekaran
Kay Hiang, Hoon
Seet Gim Lee, Gerald
author_sort Ali, Muhammad J.
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the physiological difference in recreational runners between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol. It also aimed to determine physiological surrogate that could monitor metabolic demand of prolonged running in real‐time. For data collection, a total of 18 active male recreational runners were recruited. Physiological (HR, RR, RER, ṼO(2), BLa), and overall perceptual (RPE(O)) responses were recorded against three designed test sessions. Session 1 included ṼO(2submax) test to determine critical speed (CS) at anaerobic threshold (AT). Session 2 was the noncontinuous CS test until exhaustion, having 4:1 min work‐to‐rest ratio at CS, whereas session 3 was the continuous CS test till exhaustion. As 1‐min recovery during session 2 may change fatigue behavior, it was hypothesized that it will significantly change the physiological stress and hence endurance outcomes. Results reported average time to exhaustion (TTE) was 37.33(9.8) mins for session 2 and 23.28(9.87) mins for session 3. Participants experienced relatively higher metabolic demand (BLa) 6.78(1.43) mmol.l(−1) in session 3 as compared to session 2 (5.52(0.93) mmol.l(−1)). RER was observed to increase in session 3 and decrease in session 2. Student's paired t‐test only reported a significant difference in TTE, ṼO(2), RER, RPE(O), and BLa at “End” between session 2 and 3. Reported difference in RPE(O) and %HR (max) at “AT” were 5 (2.2) and 89.8 (2.60)% during session 2 and 6 (2.5) and 89.8 (2.59)% during session 3, respectively. Regression analysis reported strong correlation of %HR (max) (adj. R‐square = 0.588) with BLa than RPE(O) (adj. R‐square = 0.541). The summary of findings suggests that decreasing RER increased TTE and reduced BLa toward “End” during session 2 which might have helped to have better endurance. The %HR (max) was identified to be used as a better noninvasive surrogate of endurance intensity estimator.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5742706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57427062018-01-03 Physiological differences between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol in recreational runners and metabolic demand prediction Ali, Muhammad J. Govindasamay, Balasekaran Kay Hiang, Hoon Seet Gim Lee, Gerald Physiol Rep Original Research This study investigated the physiological difference in recreational runners between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol. It also aimed to determine physiological surrogate that could monitor metabolic demand of prolonged running in real‐time. For data collection, a total of 18 active male recreational runners were recruited. Physiological (HR, RR, RER, ṼO(2), BLa), and overall perceptual (RPE(O)) responses were recorded against three designed test sessions. Session 1 included ṼO(2submax) test to determine critical speed (CS) at anaerobic threshold (AT). Session 2 was the noncontinuous CS test until exhaustion, having 4:1 min work‐to‐rest ratio at CS, whereas session 3 was the continuous CS test till exhaustion. As 1‐min recovery during session 2 may change fatigue behavior, it was hypothesized that it will significantly change the physiological stress and hence endurance outcomes. Results reported average time to exhaustion (TTE) was 37.33(9.8) mins for session 2 and 23.28(9.87) mins for session 3. Participants experienced relatively higher metabolic demand (BLa) 6.78(1.43) mmol.l(−1) in session 3 as compared to session 2 (5.52(0.93) mmol.l(−1)). RER was observed to increase in session 3 and decrease in session 2. Student's paired t‐test only reported a significant difference in TTE, ṼO(2), RER, RPE(O), and BLa at “End” between session 2 and 3. Reported difference in RPE(O) and %HR (max) at “AT” were 5 (2.2) and 89.8 (2.60)% during session 2 and 6 (2.5) and 89.8 (2.59)% during session 3, respectively. Regression analysis reported strong correlation of %HR (max) (adj. R‐square = 0.588) with BLa than RPE(O) (adj. R‐square = 0.541). The summary of findings suggests that decreasing RER increased TTE and reduced BLa toward “End” during session 2 which might have helped to have better endurance. The %HR (max) was identified to be used as a better noninvasive surrogate of endurance intensity estimator. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5742706/ /pubmed/29242309 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13546 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ali, Muhammad J.
Govindasamay, Balasekaran
Kay Hiang, Hoon
Seet Gim Lee, Gerald
Physiological differences between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol in recreational runners and metabolic demand prediction
title Physiological differences between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol in recreational runners and metabolic demand prediction
title_full Physiological differences between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol in recreational runners and metabolic demand prediction
title_fullStr Physiological differences between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol in recreational runners and metabolic demand prediction
title_full_unstemmed Physiological differences between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol in recreational runners and metabolic demand prediction
title_short Physiological differences between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol in recreational runners and metabolic demand prediction
title_sort physiological differences between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol in recreational runners and metabolic demand prediction
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5742706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29242309
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13546
work_keys_str_mv AT alimuhammadj physiologicaldifferencesbetweenanoncontinuousandacontinuousendurancetrainingprotocolinrecreationalrunnersandmetabolicdemandprediction
AT govindasamaybalasekaran physiologicaldifferencesbetweenanoncontinuousandacontinuousendurancetrainingprotocolinrecreationalrunnersandmetabolicdemandprediction
AT kayhianghoon physiologicaldifferencesbetweenanoncontinuousandacontinuousendurancetrainingprotocolinrecreationalrunnersandmetabolicdemandprediction
AT seetgimleegerald physiologicaldifferencesbetweenanoncontinuousandacontinuousendurancetrainingprotocolinrecreationalrunnersandmetabolicdemandprediction