Cargando…

Factors Affecting Liver Regeneration in Living Donors After Hepatectomy

BACKGROUND: The safety of living liver donors is the paramount priority of liver transplantation surgeons. The liver has an effective regeneration capacity. The regeneration rate of the liver remnant in living liver donors provides much information useful in liver surgery. The outcome of the remnant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibis, Cem, Asenov, Yavor, Akin, Melih, Azamat, Ibrahim F., Sivrikoz, Nukhet, Gurtekin, Basak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5742996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29249797
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.908136
_version_ 1783288496747708416
author Ibis, Cem
Asenov, Yavor
Akin, Melih
Azamat, Ibrahim F.
Sivrikoz, Nukhet
Gurtekin, Basak
author_facet Ibis, Cem
Asenov, Yavor
Akin, Melih
Azamat, Ibrahim F.
Sivrikoz, Nukhet
Gurtekin, Basak
author_sort Ibis, Cem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The safety of living liver donors is the paramount priority of liver transplantation surgeons. The liver has an effective regeneration capacity. The regeneration rate of the liver remnant in living liver donors provides much information useful in liver surgery. The outcome of the remnant liver after hepatectomy can be affected by many different perioperative factors. MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 46 patients were enrolled in the study. Retrospective clinical data, including preoperative and postoperative early and late computed tomography liver volumetry measurements, estimated resection volumes, resected liver weights, and postoperative laboratory values, were statistically evaluated according to the liver resection type. RESULTS: No significant difference was detected in age, sex, calculated and computed tomography estimated total liver volume, intraoperative Hb decrease, postoperative complications, or postoperative portal vein flow rate. Postoperative liver enlargement rates were significant higher in the right hemihepatectomy (RHH) group than in the left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) group. The size of the liver remnant or graft has a major effect on regeneration rate. Postoperative biliary leakage did not have any significant effect on liver regeneration. No post-hepatectomy liver failure was detected among the liver donors. CONCLUSIONS: Liver hypertrophy depends on the extent of liver resection. The cause of volume decrease in the LLS group after hepatectomy in our series appears to be the gradual atrophy of liver segment 4. RHH and LLS surgeries differ from each other in terms of resected liver volume, as well as inflammatory activity, and the latter appears to affect liver regeneration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5742996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57429962017-12-29 Factors Affecting Liver Regeneration in Living Donors After Hepatectomy Ibis, Cem Asenov, Yavor Akin, Melih Azamat, Ibrahim F. Sivrikoz, Nukhet Gurtekin, Basak Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: The safety of living liver donors is the paramount priority of liver transplantation surgeons. The liver has an effective regeneration capacity. The regeneration rate of the liver remnant in living liver donors provides much information useful in liver surgery. The outcome of the remnant liver after hepatectomy can be affected by many different perioperative factors. MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 46 patients were enrolled in the study. Retrospective clinical data, including preoperative and postoperative early and late computed tomography liver volumetry measurements, estimated resection volumes, resected liver weights, and postoperative laboratory values, were statistically evaluated according to the liver resection type. RESULTS: No significant difference was detected in age, sex, calculated and computed tomography estimated total liver volume, intraoperative Hb decrease, postoperative complications, or postoperative portal vein flow rate. Postoperative liver enlargement rates were significant higher in the right hemihepatectomy (RHH) group than in the left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) group. The size of the liver remnant or graft has a major effect on regeneration rate. Postoperative biliary leakage did not have any significant effect on liver regeneration. No post-hepatectomy liver failure was detected among the liver donors. CONCLUSIONS: Liver hypertrophy depends on the extent of liver resection. The cause of volume decrease in the LLS group after hepatectomy in our series appears to be the gradual atrophy of liver segment 4. RHH and LLS surgeries differ from each other in terms of resected liver volume, as well as inflammatory activity, and the latter appears to affect liver regeneration. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2017-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5742996/ /pubmed/29249797 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.908136 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2017 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Ibis, Cem
Asenov, Yavor
Akin, Melih
Azamat, Ibrahim F.
Sivrikoz, Nukhet
Gurtekin, Basak
Factors Affecting Liver Regeneration in Living Donors After Hepatectomy
title Factors Affecting Liver Regeneration in Living Donors After Hepatectomy
title_full Factors Affecting Liver Regeneration in Living Donors After Hepatectomy
title_fullStr Factors Affecting Liver Regeneration in Living Donors After Hepatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Factors Affecting Liver Regeneration in Living Donors After Hepatectomy
title_short Factors Affecting Liver Regeneration in Living Donors After Hepatectomy
title_sort factors affecting liver regeneration in living donors after hepatectomy
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5742996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29249797
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.908136
work_keys_str_mv AT ibiscem factorsaffectingliverregenerationinlivingdonorsafterhepatectomy
AT asenovyavor factorsaffectingliverregenerationinlivingdonorsafterhepatectomy
AT akinmelih factorsaffectingliverregenerationinlivingdonorsafterhepatectomy
AT azamatibrahimf factorsaffectingliverregenerationinlivingdonorsafterhepatectomy
AT sivrikoznukhet factorsaffectingliverregenerationinlivingdonorsafterhepatectomy
AT gurtekinbasak factorsaffectingliverregenerationinlivingdonorsafterhepatectomy