Cargando…

Elements of virtual temporal bone surgery: Manipulandum format may be more important to surgeons than haptic device force capabilities

BACKGROUND: Temporal bone simulations are critiqued for poor drill‐bone interaction. This project appraises the import of increasing haptic device and manipulandum fidelity on the perceived realism of drilling a virtual temporal bone. Virtual surgical contact forces rely on haptic device fidelity an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Unger, Bertram, Sepehri, Nariman, Rampersad, Vivek, Pisa, Justyn, Michael Gousseau, Hochman, Jordan B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5743167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29299508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.120
_version_ 1783288518270779392
author Unger, Bertram
Sepehri, Nariman
Rampersad, Vivek
Pisa, Justyn
Michael Gousseau,
Hochman, Jordan B.
author_facet Unger, Bertram
Sepehri, Nariman
Rampersad, Vivek
Pisa, Justyn
Michael Gousseau,
Hochman, Jordan B.
author_sort Unger, Bertram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Temporal bone simulations are critiqued for poor drill‐bone interaction. This project appraises the import of increasing haptic device and manipulandum fidelity on the perceived realism of drilling a virtual temporal bone. Virtual surgical contact forces rely on haptic device fidelity and are transmitted through a manipulandum. With identical software, both device hardware and manipulandum may each contribute to realism. We compare the three degrees of freedom (DOF), 3N Geomagic Touch (3D Systems, SC) to a 6DOF, 5.5N HD(2) (Quanser, ON) with the both standard (“HD(2)–Standard”) and in‐house customized otic drill manipulandum (“HD(2)–Modified”). METHODS: Six otologic surgeons performed three virtual mastoidectomy surgeries on a temporal bone surgical simulator. The HD(2) manipulandum was modified for attached otic drill with gravity compensation and requisite mechanical modifications. Surgeons, in random order, performed the dissection with the different hardware platforms. RESULTS: Two‐tailed t‐tests demonstrate that for the acoustic properties of each simulation, the HD(2)–Modified manipulandum was favored (p ≤ 0.0004). For overall similarity of bone, both HD(2)–Standard (p ≤ 0.05) HD(2)–Modified (p ≤ 0.03)) were favored over the Geomagic; however they were not appreciably different when directly compared to each other. There was no preference for increasing haptic device fidelity in virtual drill bone interaction. In forced rank, users favored the HD(2)–Modified in osseus, vibrational and overall realism, as well as being preferred for education and preoperative rehearsal (p ≤ 0.0164). CONCLUSION: Increasing manipulandum realism was favored. However surprisingly, there was no preference for increased device fidelity, illustrating incremental stiffness had nominal impact. There may be a ceiling to drill bone interaction in virtual haptic simulation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5743167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57431672018-01-03 Elements of virtual temporal bone surgery: Manipulandum format may be more important to surgeons than haptic device force capabilities Unger, Bertram Sepehri, Nariman Rampersad, Vivek Pisa, Justyn Michael Gousseau, Hochman, Jordan B. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Temporal bone simulations are critiqued for poor drill‐bone interaction. This project appraises the import of increasing haptic device and manipulandum fidelity on the perceived realism of drilling a virtual temporal bone. Virtual surgical contact forces rely on haptic device fidelity and are transmitted through a manipulandum. With identical software, both device hardware and manipulandum may each contribute to realism. We compare the three degrees of freedom (DOF), 3N Geomagic Touch (3D Systems, SC) to a 6DOF, 5.5N HD(2) (Quanser, ON) with the both standard (“HD(2)–Standard”) and in‐house customized otic drill manipulandum (“HD(2)–Modified”). METHODS: Six otologic surgeons performed three virtual mastoidectomy surgeries on a temporal bone surgical simulator. The HD(2) manipulandum was modified for attached otic drill with gravity compensation and requisite mechanical modifications. Surgeons, in random order, performed the dissection with the different hardware platforms. RESULTS: Two‐tailed t‐tests demonstrate that for the acoustic properties of each simulation, the HD(2)–Modified manipulandum was favored (p ≤ 0.0004). For overall similarity of bone, both HD(2)–Standard (p ≤ 0.05) HD(2)–Modified (p ≤ 0.03)) were favored over the Geomagic; however they were not appreciably different when directly compared to each other. There was no preference for increasing haptic device fidelity in virtual drill bone interaction. In forced rank, users favored the HD(2)–Modified in osseus, vibrational and overall realism, as well as being preferred for education and preoperative rehearsal (p ≤ 0.0164). CONCLUSION: Increasing manipulandum realism was favored. However surprisingly, there was no preference for increased device fidelity, illustrating incremental stiffness had nominal impact. There may be a ceiling to drill bone interaction in virtual haptic simulation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5743167/ /pubmed/29299508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.120 Text en © 2017 The Authors Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Triological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
Unger, Bertram
Sepehri, Nariman
Rampersad, Vivek
Pisa, Justyn
Michael Gousseau,
Hochman, Jordan B.
Elements of virtual temporal bone surgery: Manipulandum format may be more important to surgeons than haptic device force capabilities
title Elements of virtual temporal bone surgery: Manipulandum format may be more important to surgeons than haptic device force capabilities
title_full Elements of virtual temporal bone surgery: Manipulandum format may be more important to surgeons than haptic device force capabilities
title_fullStr Elements of virtual temporal bone surgery: Manipulandum format may be more important to surgeons than haptic device force capabilities
title_full_unstemmed Elements of virtual temporal bone surgery: Manipulandum format may be more important to surgeons than haptic device force capabilities
title_short Elements of virtual temporal bone surgery: Manipulandum format may be more important to surgeons than haptic device force capabilities
title_sort elements of virtual temporal bone surgery: manipulandum format may be more important to surgeons than haptic device force capabilities
topic Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5743167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29299508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.120
work_keys_str_mv AT ungerbertram elementsofvirtualtemporalbonesurgerymanipulandumformatmaybemoreimportanttosurgeonsthanhapticdeviceforcecapabilities
AT sepehrinariman elementsofvirtualtemporalbonesurgerymanipulandumformatmaybemoreimportanttosurgeonsthanhapticdeviceforcecapabilities
AT rampersadvivek elementsofvirtualtemporalbonesurgerymanipulandumformatmaybemoreimportanttosurgeonsthanhapticdeviceforcecapabilities
AT pisajustyn elementsofvirtualtemporalbonesurgerymanipulandumformatmaybemoreimportanttosurgeonsthanhapticdeviceforcecapabilities
AT michaelgousseau elementsofvirtualtemporalbonesurgerymanipulandumformatmaybemoreimportanttosurgeonsthanhapticdeviceforcecapabilities
AT hochmanjordanb elementsofvirtualtemporalbonesurgerymanipulandumformatmaybemoreimportanttosurgeonsthanhapticdeviceforcecapabilities