Cargando…

Comparative population genetic structure of redbelly tilapia (Coptodon zillii (Gervais, 1848)) from three different aquatic habitats in Egypt

Recently, tilapia have become increasingly important in aquaculture and fisheries worldwide. They are one of the major protein sources in many African countries and are helping to combat malnutrition. Therefore, maintenance and conservation genetics of wild populations of tilapia are of great signif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soliman, Taha, Aly, Walid, Fahim, Reda M., Berumen, Michael L., Jenke‐Kodama, Holger, Bernardi, Giacomo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5743693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29299284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3586
_version_ 1783288610432221184
author Soliman, Taha
Aly, Walid
Fahim, Reda M.
Berumen, Michael L.
Jenke‐Kodama, Holger
Bernardi, Giacomo
author_facet Soliman, Taha
Aly, Walid
Fahim, Reda M.
Berumen, Michael L.
Jenke‐Kodama, Holger
Bernardi, Giacomo
author_sort Soliman, Taha
collection PubMed
description Recently, tilapia have become increasingly important in aquaculture and fisheries worldwide. They are one of the major protein sources in many African countries and are helping to combat malnutrition. Therefore, maintenance and conservation genetics of wild populations of tilapia are of great significance. In this study, we report the population genetic structure and genetic diversity of the redbelly tilapia (Coptodon zillii) in three different Egyptian aquatic environments: brackish (Lake Idku), marine (Al‐Max Bay), and freshwater (Lake Nasser). The habitat differences, environmental factors, and harvesting pressures are the main characteristics of the sampling sites. Three mitochondrial DNA markers (COI: cytochrome oxidase subunit I; the D‐loop; CYTB: cytochrome b) were used to assess population structure differences among the three populations. The population at Lake Nasser presented the highest genetic diversity (H (d) = 0.8116, H = 6), and the marine population of Al‐Max Bay the lowest (H (d) = 0.2391, H = 4) of the combined sequences. In addition, the phylogenetic haplotype network showed private haplotypes in each environmental habitat. Results presented here will be useful in aquaculture to introduce the appropriate broodstock for future aquaculture strategies of C. zillii. In addition, evidence of population structure may contribute to the management of tilapia fisheries in Egyptian waters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5743693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57436932018-01-03 Comparative population genetic structure of redbelly tilapia (Coptodon zillii (Gervais, 1848)) from three different aquatic habitats in Egypt Soliman, Taha Aly, Walid Fahim, Reda M. Berumen, Michael L. Jenke‐Kodama, Holger Bernardi, Giacomo Ecol Evol Original Research Recently, tilapia have become increasingly important in aquaculture and fisheries worldwide. They are one of the major protein sources in many African countries and are helping to combat malnutrition. Therefore, maintenance and conservation genetics of wild populations of tilapia are of great significance. In this study, we report the population genetic structure and genetic diversity of the redbelly tilapia (Coptodon zillii) in three different Egyptian aquatic environments: brackish (Lake Idku), marine (Al‐Max Bay), and freshwater (Lake Nasser). The habitat differences, environmental factors, and harvesting pressures are the main characteristics of the sampling sites. Three mitochondrial DNA markers (COI: cytochrome oxidase subunit I; the D‐loop; CYTB: cytochrome b) were used to assess population structure differences among the three populations. The population at Lake Nasser presented the highest genetic diversity (H (d) = 0.8116, H = 6), and the marine population of Al‐Max Bay the lowest (H (d) = 0.2391, H = 4) of the combined sequences. In addition, the phylogenetic haplotype network showed private haplotypes in each environmental habitat. Results presented here will be useful in aquaculture to introduce the appropriate broodstock for future aquaculture strategies of C. zillii. In addition, evidence of population structure may contribute to the management of tilapia fisheries in Egyptian waters. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5743693/ /pubmed/29299284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3586 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Soliman, Taha
Aly, Walid
Fahim, Reda M.
Berumen, Michael L.
Jenke‐Kodama, Holger
Bernardi, Giacomo
Comparative population genetic structure of redbelly tilapia (Coptodon zillii (Gervais, 1848)) from three different aquatic habitats in Egypt
title Comparative population genetic structure of redbelly tilapia (Coptodon zillii (Gervais, 1848)) from three different aquatic habitats in Egypt
title_full Comparative population genetic structure of redbelly tilapia (Coptodon zillii (Gervais, 1848)) from three different aquatic habitats in Egypt
title_fullStr Comparative population genetic structure of redbelly tilapia (Coptodon zillii (Gervais, 1848)) from three different aquatic habitats in Egypt
title_full_unstemmed Comparative population genetic structure of redbelly tilapia (Coptodon zillii (Gervais, 1848)) from three different aquatic habitats in Egypt
title_short Comparative population genetic structure of redbelly tilapia (Coptodon zillii (Gervais, 1848)) from three different aquatic habitats in Egypt
title_sort comparative population genetic structure of redbelly tilapia (coptodon zillii (gervais, 1848)) from three different aquatic habitats in egypt
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5743693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29299284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3586
work_keys_str_mv AT solimantaha comparativepopulationgeneticstructureofredbellytilapiacoptodonzilliigervais1848fromthreedifferentaquatichabitatsinegypt
AT alywalid comparativepopulationgeneticstructureofredbellytilapiacoptodonzilliigervais1848fromthreedifferentaquatichabitatsinegypt
AT fahimredam comparativepopulationgeneticstructureofredbellytilapiacoptodonzilliigervais1848fromthreedifferentaquatichabitatsinegypt
AT berumenmichaell comparativepopulationgeneticstructureofredbellytilapiacoptodonzilliigervais1848fromthreedifferentaquatichabitatsinegypt
AT jenkekodamaholger comparativepopulationgeneticstructureofredbellytilapiacoptodonzilliigervais1848fromthreedifferentaquatichabitatsinegypt
AT bernardigiacomo comparativepopulationgeneticstructureofredbellytilapiacoptodonzilliigervais1848fromthreedifferentaquatichabitatsinegypt