Cargando…

Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy

Both a Cu–26 wt % Ag (Fe-free) alloy and Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe (Fe-doping) alloy were subjected to different heat treatments. We studied the precipitation kinetics of Ag and Cu, microstructure evolution, magnetization, hardness, strength, and electrical resistivity of the two alloys. Fe addition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Rui, Wang, Engang, Zuo, Xiaowei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5744318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29207505
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10121383
_version_ 1783288721466982400
author Li, Rui
Wang, Engang
Zuo, Xiaowei
author_facet Li, Rui
Wang, Engang
Zuo, Xiaowei
author_sort Li, Rui
collection PubMed
description Both a Cu–26 wt % Ag (Fe-free) alloy and Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe (Fe-doping) alloy were subjected to different heat treatments. We studied the precipitation kinetics of Ag and Cu, microstructure evolution, magnetization, hardness, strength, and electrical resistivity of the two alloys. Fe addition was incapable of changing the precipitation kinetics of Ag and Cu; however, it decreased the size and spacing of rod-shaped Ag precipitates within a Cu matrix, because Fe might affect the elastic strain field and diffusion field, suppressing the nucleation of Ag precipitates. Magnetization curves showed that γ-Fe precipitates were precipitated out of the Cu matrix, along with Ag precipitates in Fe-doping alloy after heat treatments. The yield strength of the Fe-doping alloy was higher than that of the Fe-free alloy, and the maximum increment was about 41.3%. The electrical conductivity in the aged Fe-doping alloy was up to about 67% IACS (International Annealed Copper Standard). Hardness, strength, and electrical resistivity were intensively discussed, based on the microstructural characterization and solute contributions of both alloys. Our results demonstrated that an increasing fraction of nanoscale γ-Fe precipitates and decreasing spacing between Ag precipitates resulted in the increasing strength of the Fe-doping alloy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5744318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57443182017-12-31 Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy Li, Rui Wang, Engang Zuo, Xiaowei Materials (Basel) Article Both a Cu–26 wt % Ag (Fe-free) alloy and Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe (Fe-doping) alloy were subjected to different heat treatments. We studied the precipitation kinetics of Ag and Cu, microstructure evolution, magnetization, hardness, strength, and electrical resistivity of the two alloys. Fe addition was incapable of changing the precipitation kinetics of Ag and Cu; however, it decreased the size and spacing of rod-shaped Ag precipitates within a Cu matrix, because Fe might affect the elastic strain field and diffusion field, suppressing the nucleation of Ag precipitates. Magnetization curves showed that γ-Fe precipitates were precipitated out of the Cu matrix, along with Ag precipitates in Fe-doping alloy after heat treatments. The yield strength of the Fe-doping alloy was higher than that of the Fe-free alloy, and the maximum increment was about 41.3%. The electrical conductivity in the aged Fe-doping alloy was up to about 67% IACS (International Annealed Copper Standard). Hardness, strength, and electrical resistivity were intensively discussed, based on the microstructural characterization and solute contributions of both alloys. Our results demonstrated that an increasing fraction of nanoscale γ-Fe precipitates and decreasing spacing between Ag precipitates resulted in the increasing strength of the Fe-doping alloy. MDPI 2017-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5744318/ /pubmed/29207505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10121383 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Rui
Wang, Engang
Zuo, Xiaowei
Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy
title Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy
title_full Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy
title_fullStr Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy
title_full_unstemmed Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy
title_short Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy
title_sort co-precipitation, strength and electrical resistivity of cu–26 wt % ag–0.1 wt % fe alloy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5744318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29207505
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10121383
work_keys_str_mv AT lirui coprecipitationstrengthandelectricalresistivityofcu26wtag01wtfealloy
AT wangengang coprecipitationstrengthandelectricalresistivityofcu26wtag01wtfealloy
AT zuoxiaowei coprecipitationstrengthandelectricalresistivityofcu26wtag01wtfealloy