Cargando…

Evaluation and Performance of ArcCheck and Film using Gamma Criteria in Pre-treatment Quality Assurance of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy

AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the use of ArcCHECK (AC) as an alternative method to replace film dosimetry for pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) ste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramachandran, Prabhakar, Tajaldeen, Abdulrahman, Taylor, David, Wanigaratne, Derrick, Roozen, Karl, Geso, Moshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5744454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29296040
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_132_16
_version_ 1783288748526534656
author Ramachandran, Prabhakar
Tajaldeen, Abdulrahman
Taylor, David
Wanigaratne, Derrick
Roozen, Karl
Geso, Moshi
author_facet Ramachandran, Prabhakar
Tajaldeen, Abdulrahman
Taylor, David
Wanigaratne, Derrick
Roozen, Karl
Geso, Moshi
author_sort Ramachandran, Prabhakar
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the use of ArcCHECK (AC) as an alternative method to replace film dosimetry for pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) treatment plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with a varied diagnosis of lung, spine, sacrum, sternum, ribs, scapula, and femur undergoing SABR were selected for this study. Pre-treatment QA was performed for all the patients using ionization chamber and film dosimetry. Measurements were also carried out on an AC phantom. The planned and measured doses from the AC device and EBT3 films were compared using four different gamma criteria: 2%/2 mm, 3%/2 mm, 3%/1 mm, and 3%/3 mm. RESULTS: The mean gamma passing rates at 3%/3 mm for all non-spine SABR cases were 98.79 ± 0.96 and 99.27 ± 1.03 with AC and films, respectively. The mean passing rates at 3%/2 mm for AC and films were 98.76 ± 0.42 and 99.43 ± 0.27 respectively for spine VMAT SABR, and 87.15 ± 2.45 and 99.79 ± 0.14 respectively for spine IMRT SABR. In the case of spine tumors, the gamma criterion was tightened due to the proximity of spinal cord to the planning target volume. Our results show that AC provides good results for all VMAT SABR plans. CONCLUSION: The AC results at 3%/3 mm were in good agreement with film dosimetry for most cases. We observed a significant reduction in QA time on using AC for SABR QA. This study showed that AC results are comparable to film dosimetry for all studied sites except for spine IMRT SABR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5744454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57444542018-01-02 Evaluation and Performance of ArcCheck and Film using Gamma Criteria in Pre-treatment Quality Assurance of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Ramachandran, Prabhakar Tajaldeen, Abdulrahman Taylor, David Wanigaratne, Derrick Roozen, Karl Geso, Moshi J Med Phys Technical Note AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the use of ArcCHECK (AC) as an alternative method to replace film dosimetry for pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) treatment plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with a varied diagnosis of lung, spine, sacrum, sternum, ribs, scapula, and femur undergoing SABR were selected for this study. Pre-treatment QA was performed for all the patients using ionization chamber and film dosimetry. Measurements were also carried out on an AC phantom. The planned and measured doses from the AC device and EBT3 films were compared using four different gamma criteria: 2%/2 mm, 3%/2 mm, 3%/1 mm, and 3%/3 mm. RESULTS: The mean gamma passing rates at 3%/3 mm for all non-spine SABR cases were 98.79 ± 0.96 and 99.27 ± 1.03 with AC and films, respectively. The mean passing rates at 3%/2 mm for AC and films were 98.76 ± 0.42 and 99.43 ± 0.27 respectively for spine VMAT SABR, and 87.15 ± 2.45 and 99.79 ± 0.14 respectively for spine IMRT SABR. In the case of spine tumors, the gamma criterion was tightened due to the proximity of spinal cord to the planning target volume. Our results show that AC provides good results for all VMAT SABR plans. CONCLUSION: The AC results at 3%/3 mm were in good agreement with film dosimetry for most cases. We observed a significant reduction in QA time on using AC for SABR QA. This study showed that AC results are comparable to film dosimetry for all studied sites except for spine IMRT SABR. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5744454/ /pubmed/29296040 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_132_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Ramachandran, Prabhakar
Tajaldeen, Abdulrahman
Taylor, David
Wanigaratne, Derrick
Roozen, Karl
Geso, Moshi
Evaluation and Performance of ArcCheck and Film using Gamma Criteria in Pre-treatment Quality Assurance of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
title Evaluation and Performance of ArcCheck and Film using Gamma Criteria in Pre-treatment Quality Assurance of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
title_full Evaluation and Performance of ArcCheck and Film using Gamma Criteria in Pre-treatment Quality Assurance of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
title_fullStr Evaluation and Performance of ArcCheck and Film using Gamma Criteria in Pre-treatment Quality Assurance of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and Performance of ArcCheck and Film using Gamma Criteria in Pre-treatment Quality Assurance of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
title_short Evaluation and Performance of ArcCheck and Film using Gamma Criteria in Pre-treatment Quality Assurance of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
title_sort evaluation and performance of arccheck and film using gamma criteria in pre-treatment quality assurance of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5744454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29296040
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_132_16
work_keys_str_mv AT ramachandranprabhakar evaluationandperformanceofarccheckandfilmusinggammacriteriainpretreatmentqualityassuranceofstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT tajaldeenabdulrahman evaluationandperformanceofarccheckandfilmusinggammacriteriainpretreatmentqualityassuranceofstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT taylordavid evaluationandperformanceofarccheckandfilmusinggammacriteriainpretreatmentqualityassuranceofstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT wanigaratnederrick evaluationandperformanceofarccheckandfilmusinggammacriteriainpretreatmentqualityassuranceofstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT roozenkarl evaluationandperformanceofarccheckandfilmusinggammacriteriainpretreatmentqualityassuranceofstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT gesomoshi evaluationandperformanceofarccheckandfilmusinggammacriteriainpretreatmentqualityassuranceofstereotacticablativeradiotherapy