Cargando…

The Ratio between Field Attractive and Background Volatiles Encodes Host-Plant Recognition in a Specialist Moth

Volatiles emitted by plants convey an array of information through different trophic levels. Animals such as host-seeking herbivores encounter plumes with filaments from both host and non-host plants. While studies showed a behavioral effect of non-host plants on herbivore host location, less inform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knudsen, Geir K., Norli, Hans R., Tasin, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5744616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29312430
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02206
_version_ 1783288781954088960
author Knudsen, Geir K.
Norli, Hans R.
Tasin, Marco
author_facet Knudsen, Geir K.
Norli, Hans R.
Tasin, Marco
author_sort Knudsen, Geir K.
collection PubMed
description Volatiles emitted by plants convey an array of information through different trophic levels. Animals such as host-seeking herbivores encounter plumes with filaments from both host and non-host plants. While studies showed a behavioral effect of non-host plants on herbivore host location, less information is available on how a searching insect herbivore perceives and flies upwind to a host-plant odor plume within a background of non-host volatiles. We hypothesized here that herbivorous insects in search of a host-plant can discriminate plumes of host and non-host plants and that the taxonomic relatedness of the non-host have an effect on finding the host. We also predicted that the ratio between certain plant volatiles is cognized as host-plant recognition cue by a receiver herbivorous insect. To verify these hypotheses we measured the wind tunnel response of the moth Argyresthia conjugella to the host plant rowan, to non-host plants taxonomically related (Rosaceae, apple and pear) or unrelated to the host (Pinaceae, spruce) and to binary combination of host and non-host plants. Volatiles were collected from all plant combinations and delivered to the test insect via an ultrasonic sprayer as an artificial plume. While the response to the rowan as a plant was not affected by the addition of any of the non-host plants, the attraction to the corresponding sprayed headspace decreased when pear or apple but not spruce were added to rowan. A similar result was measured toward the odor exiting a jar where freshly cut plant material of apple or pear or spruce was intermixed with rowan. Dose-response gas-chromatography coupled to electroantennography revealed the presence of seven field attractive and seven background non-attractive antennally active compounds. Although the abundance of field attractive and of some background volatiles decreased in all dual combinations in comparison with rowan alone, an increased amount of the background compounds (3E)-4,8-Dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene ((E)-DMNT) and (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate was found in the rowan-apple and rowan-pear but not in the rowan-spruce headspace. A higher ratio between the abundance of each field attractive component and that of (E)-DMNT and (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate was measured for rowan and rowan-spruce in contrast to rowan-pear and rowan-apple headspaces. Our result suggests that the ratio between field attractive and background antennaly active volatiles encodes host-plant recognition in our study system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5744616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57446162018-01-08 The Ratio between Field Attractive and Background Volatiles Encodes Host-Plant Recognition in a Specialist Moth Knudsen, Geir K. Norli, Hans R. Tasin, Marco Front Plant Sci Plant Science Volatiles emitted by plants convey an array of information through different trophic levels. Animals such as host-seeking herbivores encounter plumes with filaments from both host and non-host plants. While studies showed a behavioral effect of non-host plants on herbivore host location, less information is available on how a searching insect herbivore perceives and flies upwind to a host-plant odor plume within a background of non-host volatiles. We hypothesized here that herbivorous insects in search of a host-plant can discriminate plumes of host and non-host plants and that the taxonomic relatedness of the non-host have an effect on finding the host. We also predicted that the ratio between certain plant volatiles is cognized as host-plant recognition cue by a receiver herbivorous insect. To verify these hypotheses we measured the wind tunnel response of the moth Argyresthia conjugella to the host plant rowan, to non-host plants taxonomically related (Rosaceae, apple and pear) or unrelated to the host (Pinaceae, spruce) and to binary combination of host and non-host plants. Volatiles were collected from all plant combinations and delivered to the test insect via an ultrasonic sprayer as an artificial plume. While the response to the rowan as a plant was not affected by the addition of any of the non-host plants, the attraction to the corresponding sprayed headspace decreased when pear or apple but not spruce were added to rowan. A similar result was measured toward the odor exiting a jar where freshly cut plant material of apple or pear or spruce was intermixed with rowan. Dose-response gas-chromatography coupled to electroantennography revealed the presence of seven field attractive and seven background non-attractive antennally active compounds. Although the abundance of field attractive and of some background volatiles decreased in all dual combinations in comparison with rowan alone, an increased amount of the background compounds (3E)-4,8-Dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene ((E)-DMNT) and (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate was found in the rowan-apple and rowan-pear but not in the rowan-spruce headspace. A higher ratio between the abundance of each field attractive component and that of (E)-DMNT and (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate was measured for rowan and rowan-spruce in contrast to rowan-pear and rowan-apple headspaces. Our result suggests that the ratio between field attractive and background antennaly active volatiles encodes host-plant recognition in our study system. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5744616/ /pubmed/29312430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02206 Text en Copyright © 2017 Knudsen, Norli and Tasin. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Knudsen, Geir K.
Norli, Hans R.
Tasin, Marco
The Ratio between Field Attractive and Background Volatiles Encodes Host-Plant Recognition in a Specialist Moth
title The Ratio between Field Attractive and Background Volatiles Encodes Host-Plant Recognition in a Specialist Moth
title_full The Ratio between Field Attractive and Background Volatiles Encodes Host-Plant Recognition in a Specialist Moth
title_fullStr The Ratio between Field Attractive and Background Volatiles Encodes Host-Plant Recognition in a Specialist Moth
title_full_unstemmed The Ratio between Field Attractive and Background Volatiles Encodes Host-Plant Recognition in a Specialist Moth
title_short The Ratio between Field Attractive and Background Volatiles Encodes Host-Plant Recognition in a Specialist Moth
title_sort ratio between field attractive and background volatiles encodes host-plant recognition in a specialist moth
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5744616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29312430
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02206
work_keys_str_mv AT knudsengeirk theratiobetweenfieldattractiveandbackgroundvolatilesencodeshostplantrecognitioninaspecialistmoth
AT norlihansr theratiobetweenfieldattractiveandbackgroundvolatilesencodeshostplantrecognitioninaspecialistmoth
AT tasinmarco theratiobetweenfieldattractiveandbackgroundvolatilesencodeshostplantrecognitioninaspecialistmoth
AT knudsengeirk ratiobetweenfieldattractiveandbackgroundvolatilesencodeshostplantrecognitioninaspecialistmoth
AT norlihansr ratiobetweenfieldattractiveandbackgroundvolatilesencodeshostplantrecognitioninaspecialistmoth
AT tasinmarco ratiobetweenfieldattractiveandbackgroundvolatilesencodeshostplantrecognitioninaspecialistmoth