Cargando…
The impact of indacaterol/glycopyrronium fixed-dose combination versus tiotropium monotherapy on lung function and treatment preference: a randomized crossover study – the FAVOR study
BACKGROUND: The objective of the FAVOR study was to evaluate the effect of indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) versus tiotropium on peak forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) and also to investigate patient satisfaction and treatment preference. METHODS: Patients with moderate-to-severe airflow...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5744738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29317812 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S146189 |
_version_ | 1783288802080456704 |
---|---|
author | Kardos, Peter Hagedorn-Peinz, Ina |
author_facet | Kardos, Peter Hagedorn-Peinz, Ina |
author_sort | Kardos, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The objective of the FAVOR study was to evaluate the effect of indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) versus tiotropium on peak forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) and also to investigate patient satisfaction and treatment preference. METHODS: Patients with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation (FEV(1)/forced vital capacity ratio of <0.70), those with a COPD assessment test score of ≥10, and those who were maintained on tiotropium HandiHaler(®) therapy prior to enrollment were recruited for the study, and randomized (1:1) to receive either 4 weeks open-label IND/GLY (110/50 μg) once daily followed by 4 weeks of tiotropium (18 μg) once daily or vice versa. The primary endpoint was FEV(1) 1 h post-inhalation after 4 weeks of treatment. Other endpoints included patient’s and physician’s preference for treatment, patient’s satisfaction evaluated using a study-specific questionnaire and the abbreviated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication, and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Eighty-seven out of 88 randomized patients completed the study and showed significantly higher FEV(1) 1 h post-inhalation after 4 weeks of treatment with IND/GLY versus tiotropium (treatment difference =0.081 L; p=0.0017). IND/GLY was preferred over tiotropium among the patients (69.4% versus 30.6%, p=0.0004) and the physicians (81.6% versus 18.4%, p<0.0001). A higher proportion of the patients stated they were very satisfied or satisfied with IND/GLY versus tiotropium with regard to dyspnea reduction (79.3% versus 58.0%, respectively) and reduction of dyspnea on exertion (72.4% versus 43.2%, respectively). Patients treated with IND/GLY showed significant improvement in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication domain scores versus tiotropium. IND/GLY demonstrated a good safety and tolerability profile. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that, beyond FEV(1), important patient-reported outcomes improved with the open-label dual bronchodilator IND/GLY when compared with tiotropium. This study suggests that individual patients felt the lung function benefits with IND/GLY compared with tiotropium, which, in turn, may also have contributed to the preference for IND/GLY. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5744738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57447382018-01-09 The impact of indacaterol/glycopyrronium fixed-dose combination versus tiotropium monotherapy on lung function and treatment preference: a randomized crossover study – the FAVOR study Kardos, Peter Hagedorn-Peinz, Ina Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: The objective of the FAVOR study was to evaluate the effect of indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) versus tiotropium on peak forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) and also to investigate patient satisfaction and treatment preference. METHODS: Patients with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation (FEV(1)/forced vital capacity ratio of <0.70), those with a COPD assessment test score of ≥10, and those who were maintained on tiotropium HandiHaler(®) therapy prior to enrollment were recruited for the study, and randomized (1:1) to receive either 4 weeks open-label IND/GLY (110/50 μg) once daily followed by 4 weeks of tiotropium (18 μg) once daily or vice versa. The primary endpoint was FEV(1) 1 h post-inhalation after 4 weeks of treatment. Other endpoints included patient’s and physician’s preference for treatment, patient’s satisfaction evaluated using a study-specific questionnaire and the abbreviated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication, and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Eighty-seven out of 88 randomized patients completed the study and showed significantly higher FEV(1) 1 h post-inhalation after 4 weeks of treatment with IND/GLY versus tiotropium (treatment difference =0.081 L; p=0.0017). IND/GLY was preferred over tiotropium among the patients (69.4% versus 30.6%, p=0.0004) and the physicians (81.6% versus 18.4%, p<0.0001). A higher proportion of the patients stated they were very satisfied or satisfied with IND/GLY versus tiotropium with regard to dyspnea reduction (79.3% versus 58.0%, respectively) and reduction of dyspnea on exertion (72.4% versus 43.2%, respectively). Patients treated with IND/GLY showed significant improvement in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication domain scores versus tiotropium. IND/GLY demonstrated a good safety and tolerability profile. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that, beyond FEV(1), important patient-reported outcomes improved with the open-label dual bronchodilator IND/GLY when compared with tiotropium. This study suggests that individual patients felt the lung function benefits with IND/GLY compared with tiotropium, which, in turn, may also have contributed to the preference for IND/GLY. Dove Medical Press 2017-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5744738/ /pubmed/29317812 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S146189 Text en © 2018 Kardos and Hagedorn-Peinz. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kardos, Peter Hagedorn-Peinz, Ina The impact of indacaterol/glycopyrronium fixed-dose combination versus tiotropium monotherapy on lung function and treatment preference: a randomized crossover study – the FAVOR study |
title | The impact of indacaterol/glycopyrronium fixed-dose combination versus tiotropium monotherapy on lung function and treatment preference: a randomized crossover study – the FAVOR study |
title_full | The impact of indacaterol/glycopyrronium fixed-dose combination versus tiotropium monotherapy on lung function and treatment preference: a randomized crossover study – the FAVOR study |
title_fullStr | The impact of indacaterol/glycopyrronium fixed-dose combination versus tiotropium monotherapy on lung function and treatment preference: a randomized crossover study – the FAVOR study |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of indacaterol/glycopyrronium fixed-dose combination versus tiotropium monotherapy on lung function and treatment preference: a randomized crossover study – the FAVOR study |
title_short | The impact of indacaterol/glycopyrronium fixed-dose combination versus tiotropium monotherapy on lung function and treatment preference: a randomized crossover study – the FAVOR study |
title_sort | impact of indacaterol/glycopyrronium fixed-dose combination versus tiotropium monotherapy on lung function and treatment preference: a randomized crossover study – the favor study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5744738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29317812 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S146189 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kardospeter theimpactofindacaterolglycopyrroniumfixeddosecombinationversustiotropiummonotherapyonlungfunctionandtreatmentpreferencearandomizedcrossoverstudythefavorstudy AT hagedornpeinzina theimpactofindacaterolglycopyrroniumfixeddosecombinationversustiotropiummonotherapyonlungfunctionandtreatmentpreferencearandomizedcrossoverstudythefavorstudy AT kardospeter impactofindacaterolglycopyrroniumfixeddosecombinationversustiotropiummonotherapyonlungfunctionandtreatmentpreferencearandomizedcrossoverstudythefavorstudy AT hagedornpeinzina impactofindacaterolglycopyrroniumfixeddosecombinationversustiotropiummonotherapyonlungfunctionandtreatmentpreferencearandomizedcrossoverstudythefavorstudy |