Cargando…

Effect of Filtration and Thickness of Cross-Sections of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images on Detection of Proximal Caries

OBJECTIVES: When a patient has cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images based on the treatment plan, it is possible to use these images for evaluation of caries, and there is no need for new radiographs, according to the “as low as reasonably achievable” (ALARA) principle. The aim of this study w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdinian, Mehrdad, Nazeri, Rahman, Ghaiour, Marzieh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29285032
_version_ 1783288878487044096
author Abdinian, Mehrdad
Nazeri, Rahman
Ghaiour, Marzieh
author_facet Abdinian, Mehrdad
Nazeri, Rahman
Ghaiour, Marzieh
author_sort Abdinian, Mehrdad
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: When a patient has cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images based on the treatment plan, it is possible to use these images for evaluation of caries, and there is no need for new radiographs, according to the “as low as reasonably achievable” (ALARA) principle. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of filtration and thickness of CBCT cross-sections on detection of proximal caries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in-vitro study, 100 teeth were placed in the dental sockets of a dry skull, and were fixed in normal proximal contacts. CBCT images were taken and were evaluated by two observers on the panoramic view at 1-, 3- and 5-mm-thick cross-sections, with the use of filtrations 0, 1 and 2. Afterwards, the samples were sectioned and underwent a histological evaluation. McNemar’s test was used to compare the findings on CBCT images and histological evaluation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and logistic regression were used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different cross-sections. RESULTS: The maximum AZ-value was achieved at 3-mm thickness/filtration 2. However, the differences between 1-mm thickness/filtration 2 and 1-mm thickness/filtration 1 were not significant (P=0.728 and 0.868, respectively). The minimum AZ-value was achieved at 5-mm thickness/filtration 0. CONCLUSIONS: Although CBCT is not sufficiently effective in detecting caries, the best cross-sections for detection of proximal caries were achieved at 3-mm thickness/filtration 2, 1-mm thickness/filtration 2 and 1-mm thickness/filtration 1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5745226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57452262017-12-28 Effect of Filtration and Thickness of Cross-Sections of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images on Detection of Proximal Caries Abdinian, Mehrdad Nazeri, Rahman Ghaiour, Marzieh J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVES: When a patient has cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images based on the treatment plan, it is possible to use these images for evaluation of caries, and there is no need for new radiographs, according to the “as low as reasonably achievable” (ALARA) principle. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of filtration and thickness of CBCT cross-sections on detection of proximal caries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in-vitro study, 100 teeth were placed in the dental sockets of a dry skull, and were fixed in normal proximal contacts. CBCT images were taken and were evaluated by two observers on the panoramic view at 1-, 3- and 5-mm-thick cross-sections, with the use of filtrations 0, 1 and 2. Afterwards, the samples were sectioned and underwent a histological evaluation. McNemar’s test was used to compare the findings on CBCT images and histological evaluation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and logistic regression were used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different cross-sections. RESULTS: The maximum AZ-value was achieved at 3-mm thickness/filtration 2. However, the differences between 1-mm thickness/filtration 2 and 1-mm thickness/filtration 1 were not significant (P=0.728 and 0.868, respectively). The minimum AZ-value was achieved at 5-mm thickness/filtration 0. CONCLUSIONS: Although CBCT is not sufficiently effective in detecting caries, the best cross-sections for detection of proximal caries were achieved at 3-mm thickness/filtration 2, 1-mm thickness/filtration 2 and 1-mm thickness/filtration 1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5745226/ /pubmed/29285032 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abdinian, Mehrdad
Nazeri, Rahman
Ghaiour, Marzieh
Effect of Filtration and Thickness of Cross-Sections of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images on Detection of Proximal Caries
title Effect of Filtration and Thickness of Cross-Sections of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images on Detection of Proximal Caries
title_full Effect of Filtration and Thickness of Cross-Sections of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images on Detection of Proximal Caries
title_fullStr Effect of Filtration and Thickness of Cross-Sections of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images on Detection of Proximal Caries
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Filtration and Thickness of Cross-Sections of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images on Detection of Proximal Caries
title_short Effect of Filtration and Thickness of Cross-Sections of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images on Detection of Proximal Caries
title_sort effect of filtration and thickness of cross-sections of cone beam computed tomography images on detection of proximal caries
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29285032
work_keys_str_mv AT abdinianmehrdad effectoffiltrationandthicknessofcrosssectionsofconebeamcomputedtomographyimagesondetectionofproximalcaries
AT nazerirahman effectoffiltrationandthicknessofcrosssectionsofconebeamcomputedtomographyimagesondetectionofproximalcaries
AT ghaiourmarzieh effectoffiltrationandthicknessofcrosssectionsofconebeamcomputedtomographyimagesondetectionofproximalcaries