Cargando…

Rapid neurophysiological screening for sensory ganglionopathy: A novel approach

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Pure sensory neuropathies involving the dorsal root ganglia are commonly referred to as sensory ganglionopathies (SG). Causes of SG can be inherited (as seen in Friedreich's ataxia) or acquired (e.g. immune‐mediated or paraneoplastic). Diagnostic criteria for confirming SG h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zis, Panagiotis, Hadjivassiliou, Marios, Sarrigiannis, Ptolemaios Georgios, Barker, Alexander St John Edward, Rao, Dasappaiah Ganesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29299392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.880
_version_ 1783288884844560384
author Zis, Panagiotis
Hadjivassiliou, Marios
Sarrigiannis, Ptolemaios Georgios
Barker, Alexander St John Edward
Rao, Dasappaiah Ganesh
author_facet Zis, Panagiotis
Hadjivassiliou, Marios
Sarrigiannis, Ptolemaios Georgios
Barker, Alexander St John Edward
Rao, Dasappaiah Ganesh
author_sort Zis, Panagiotis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Pure sensory neuropathies involving the dorsal root ganglia are commonly referred to as sensory ganglionopathies (SG). Causes of SG can be inherited (as seen in Friedreich's ataxia) or acquired (e.g. immune‐mediated or paraneoplastic). Diagnostic criteria for confirming SG have been published and consist of a combination of clinical and neurophysiological parameters. The aim of our study was to develop a neurophysiological method for rapid screening for diagnosis of SG. METHODS: For each subject we obtained the sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) of five nerves (median, ulnar, radial, sural and superficial peroneal) bilaterally. In the presence of an entrapment neuropathy we obtained the SNAP of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerves bilaterally. We estimated the number of pairs of nerves showing a SNAP asymmetry of >50% (difference of SNAPs/ lower SNAP). RESULTS: Sixty‐eight subjects, 34 patients with SG and 34 age and sex‐matched controls, participated in the study. Among all subjects using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.984 (95% CI, 0.960–1.000; SE, 0.012; p < .001). In order to detect SG, presence of SNAP asymmetry of >50% in 2 pairs of nerves, not explained by an entrapment neuropathy, shows a sensitivity of 97.1%, a specificity of 94.1%, a positive predictive value of 94.3% and a negative predictive value of 97.0 CONCLUSION: The number of pairs of nerves showing a SNAP asymmetry of >50% may be used as a novel rapid screening tool of patients with SG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5745252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57452522018-01-03 Rapid neurophysiological screening for sensory ganglionopathy: A novel approach Zis, Panagiotis Hadjivassiliou, Marios Sarrigiannis, Ptolemaios Georgios Barker, Alexander St John Edward Rao, Dasappaiah Ganesh Brain Behav Original Research BACKGROUND AND AIM: Pure sensory neuropathies involving the dorsal root ganglia are commonly referred to as sensory ganglionopathies (SG). Causes of SG can be inherited (as seen in Friedreich's ataxia) or acquired (e.g. immune‐mediated or paraneoplastic). Diagnostic criteria for confirming SG have been published and consist of a combination of clinical and neurophysiological parameters. The aim of our study was to develop a neurophysiological method for rapid screening for diagnosis of SG. METHODS: For each subject we obtained the sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) of five nerves (median, ulnar, radial, sural and superficial peroneal) bilaterally. In the presence of an entrapment neuropathy we obtained the SNAP of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerves bilaterally. We estimated the number of pairs of nerves showing a SNAP asymmetry of >50% (difference of SNAPs/ lower SNAP). RESULTS: Sixty‐eight subjects, 34 patients with SG and 34 age and sex‐matched controls, participated in the study. Among all subjects using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.984 (95% CI, 0.960–1.000; SE, 0.012; p < .001). In order to detect SG, presence of SNAP asymmetry of >50% in 2 pairs of nerves, not explained by an entrapment neuropathy, shows a sensitivity of 97.1%, a specificity of 94.1%, a positive predictive value of 94.3% and a negative predictive value of 97.0 CONCLUSION: The number of pairs of nerves showing a SNAP asymmetry of >50% may be used as a novel rapid screening tool of patients with SG. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5745252/ /pubmed/29299392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.880 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zis, Panagiotis
Hadjivassiliou, Marios
Sarrigiannis, Ptolemaios Georgios
Barker, Alexander St John Edward
Rao, Dasappaiah Ganesh
Rapid neurophysiological screening for sensory ganglionopathy: A novel approach
title Rapid neurophysiological screening for sensory ganglionopathy: A novel approach
title_full Rapid neurophysiological screening for sensory ganglionopathy: A novel approach
title_fullStr Rapid neurophysiological screening for sensory ganglionopathy: A novel approach
title_full_unstemmed Rapid neurophysiological screening for sensory ganglionopathy: A novel approach
title_short Rapid neurophysiological screening for sensory ganglionopathy: A novel approach
title_sort rapid neurophysiological screening for sensory ganglionopathy: a novel approach
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29299392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.880
work_keys_str_mv AT zispanagiotis rapidneurophysiologicalscreeningforsensoryganglionopathyanovelapproach
AT hadjivassilioumarios rapidneurophysiologicalscreeningforsensoryganglionopathyanovelapproach
AT sarrigiannisptolemaiosgeorgios rapidneurophysiologicalscreeningforsensoryganglionopathyanovelapproach
AT barkeralexanderstjohnedward rapidneurophysiologicalscreeningforsensoryganglionopathyanovelapproach
AT raodasappaiahganesh rapidneurophysiologicalscreeningforsensoryganglionopathyanovelapproach