Cargando…

Comparison of elbow flexor isokinetic peak torque and fatigue index between men and women of different training level

The purpose of the study was to compare elbow flexion peak torque (PT) and fatigue index (FI) during isokinetic concentric contractions in men and women with different training levels. Sixty-eight young men and women were divided into four groups: resistance trained men (RTM), non-resistance trained...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gentil, Paulo, Campos, Mario Hebling, Soares, Saulo, Costa, Gustavo De Conti Teixeira, Paoli, Antonio, Bianco, Antonino, Bottaro, Martim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29299219
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2017.7070
_version_ 1783288894843781120
author Gentil, Paulo
Campos, Mario Hebling
Soares, Saulo
Costa, Gustavo De Conti Teixeira
Paoli, Antonio
Bianco, Antonino
Bottaro, Martim
author_facet Gentil, Paulo
Campos, Mario Hebling
Soares, Saulo
Costa, Gustavo De Conti Teixeira
Paoli, Antonio
Bianco, Antonino
Bottaro, Martim
author_sort Gentil, Paulo
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the study was to compare elbow flexion peak torque (PT) and fatigue index (FI) during isokinetic concentric contractions in men and women with different training levels. Sixty-eight young men and women were divided into four groups: resistance trained men (RTM), non-resistance trained men (NRTM), resistance trained women (RTW) and non- resistance trained women (NRTW). Participants performed two tests on an isokinetic dynamometer, one to evaluate PT and one to evaluate FI. Significant interactions were found for sex and resistance training status with both PT and FI. In general, resistance-trained subjects had higher PT, and women showed lower PT than men. PT values were 67.12 ± 9.93 N·m for RTM, 49.9 ± 8.5 N·m for NRTM, 41.84 ± 7.52 N·m for RTW, and 26.05 ± 3.34 N·m for NRTW. Separate analysis revealed that RTM had higher PT than all other groups. However, FI was higher for NRTM than for RTM and NRTW and no difference was found between RTM and NRTW. FI was 37.86 ± 10.89 % for RTW, 45.74 ± 13.17 % for NTRW, 45.89 ± 8.24 % for RTM, and 51.92 ± 4.5 % for NRTM. Women produce lower PT, and have a higher fatigue tolerance than men of similar training status. Considering that women showed to be more resistant to fatigue than men, women can manipulate training variables differently from men, such as, including more repetitions at the same relative load or using higher relative loads at the same number of repetitions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5745383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57453832018-01-03 Comparison of elbow flexor isokinetic peak torque and fatigue index between men and women of different training level Gentil, Paulo Campos, Mario Hebling Soares, Saulo Costa, Gustavo De Conti Teixeira Paoli, Antonio Bianco, Antonino Bottaro, Martim Eur J Transl Myol Article The purpose of the study was to compare elbow flexion peak torque (PT) and fatigue index (FI) during isokinetic concentric contractions in men and women with different training levels. Sixty-eight young men and women were divided into four groups: resistance trained men (RTM), non-resistance trained men (NRTM), resistance trained women (RTW) and non- resistance trained women (NRTW). Participants performed two tests on an isokinetic dynamometer, one to evaluate PT and one to evaluate FI. Significant interactions were found for sex and resistance training status with both PT and FI. In general, resistance-trained subjects had higher PT, and women showed lower PT than men. PT values were 67.12 ± 9.93 N·m for RTM, 49.9 ± 8.5 N·m for NRTM, 41.84 ± 7.52 N·m for RTW, and 26.05 ± 3.34 N·m for NRTW. Separate analysis revealed that RTM had higher PT than all other groups. However, FI was higher for NRTM than for RTM and NRTW and no difference was found between RTM and NRTW. FI was 37.86 ± 10.89 % for RTW, 45.74 ± 13.17 % for NTRW, 45.89 ± 8.24 % for RTM, and 51.92 ± 4.5 % for NRTM. Women produce lower PT, and have a higher fatigue tolerance than men of similar training status. Considering that women showed to be more resistant to fatigue than men, women can manipulate training variables differently from men, such as, including more repetitions at the same relative load or using higher relative loads at the same number of repetitions. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2017-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5745383/ /pubmed/29299219 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2017.7070 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (by-nc 4.0) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Gentil, Paulo
Campos, Mario Hebling
Soares, Saulo
Costa, Gustavo De Conti Teixeira
Paoli, Antonio
Bianco, Antonino
Bottaro, Martim
Comparison of elbow flexor isokinetic peak torque and fatigue index between men and women of different training level
title Comparison of elbow flexor isokinetic peak torque and fatigue index between men and women of different training level
title_full Comparison of elbow flexor isokinetic peak torque and fatigue index between men and women of different training level
title_fullStr Comparison of elbow flexor isokinetic peak torque and fatigue index between men and women of different training level
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of elbow flexor isokinetic peak torque and fatigue index between men and women of different training level
title_short Comparison of elbow flexor isokinetic peak torque and fatigue index between men and women of different training level
title_sort comparison of elbow flexor isokinetic peak torque and fatigue index between men and women of different training level
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29299219
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2017.7070
work_keys_str_mv AT gentilpaulo comparisonofelbowflexorisokineticpeaktorqueandfatigueindexbetweenmenandwomenofdifferenttraininglevel
AT camposmariohebling comparisonofelbowflexorisokineticpeaktorqueandfatigueindexbetweenmenandwomenofdifferenttraininglevel
AT soaressaulo comparisonofelbowflexorisokineticpeaktorqueandfatigueindexbetweenmenandwomenofdifferenttraininglevel
AT costagustavodecontiteixeira comparisonofelbowflexorisokineticpeaktorqueandfatigueindexbetweenmenandwomenofdifferenttraininglevel
AT paoliantonio comparisonofelbowflexorisokineticpeaktorqueandfatigueindexbetweenmenandwomenofdifferenttraininglevel
AT biancoantonino comparisonofelbowflexorisokineticpeaktorqueandfatigueindexbetweenmenandwomenofdifferenttraininglevel
AT bottaromartim comparisonofelbowflexorisokineticpeaktorqueandfatigueindexbetweenmenandwomenofdifferenttraininglevel